Hey climate change deniers, how's about this with your morning coffee?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Bagel and Creamcheese
  • Start date Start date

In the 1930s, the government's Heat Wave Index was four times higher​


Although certain parts of the U.S. have undoubtedly experienced strong heat waves this summer, there’s no reason to believe these weather events are evidence that the world is hurtling toward a climate change catastrophe. In fact, the best available evidence suggests that heat waves recorded a century ago were more problematic than anything we’re seeing today.

Government researchers have been tracking heat waves for more than 100 years. According to data from the U.S. Climate Change Science Program, which is made available by the Environmental Protection Agency, the annual heat wave index for the contiguous 48 states was substantially higher in the 1930s than at any point in recent years. In some years in the 1930s, it was four times greater or even more.

Additionally, the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) has a large database of daily temperatures that goes back to 1948. NOAA used 1,066 weather stations located across the U.S. to collect this data.

According to NOAA, huge swaths of the U.S. have experienced a significant decrease in abnormally hot days recorded since 1948, especially in the Midwest and northern and eastern Texas.

If the available data so clearly reveal that there is no heat-wave crisis, why are media outlets suggesting the opposite is true? The answer is sloppy, irresponsible media reporting, combined with cherry-picked data.

Anyone who wants to show a long-term warming or cooling trend can do so by selectively choosing starting and ending points in datasets that will provide the answer you’re looking for.
 
well, when was the last time you met someone from Byzantium? All empires that rise will eventually fall.

we're watching the slow decline of the Western colonial imperial powers; from self-inflicted rot, decay, avarice,.. the implosion is all but certain.
 
ccn said:

Systematically Erasing America​


For well over 30-years now, I have used Noah Webster’s 1828 First American English Dictionary when writing about our Charters of Freedom, linking the true meaning of words in columns that were the real definitions at the time of the adoptions…so that every American could understand exactly what those documents say and mean. This is no longer possible…

Within the past 30-days or so, the REAL 1828 Webster’s Dictionary has been totally scrubbed from the internet. Instead, THIS has been erected in its place. Now, I have a full complete printed version of the original 1828 dictionary, both volumes. However, I can no longer link to a book like I could the online version and neither can anyone else. It’s gone!

As anyone who knows contract law can confirm, the true meaning of the words in the contract at the time of the execution are the proper legal conditions of the contract. In this case, the contracts are The Declaration of Independence 1776, the U.S. Constitution 1787, and Bill of Rights 1791. These documents can only be properly interpreted by the definitions in use at that time.

“This online edition has been carefully prepared in a proprietary format. All of the words, definitions and examples have been preserved, but the explanations of word origins have been omitted to make using the data in a digital format more accessible. We have omitted Webster’s lengthy technical introduction for the same reason.

Scripture references have been standardized in a modern format, and many abbreviations have been expanded for ease in understanding.” LINK

Now, one need look no further than the NEW definition of the word “citizen” to see why the original 1828 Dictionary was fraudulently replaced by the new edited version, now the only version available online. The word no longer means “a legal member of society.” Instead, the term citizen includes all “inhabitants,” which is necessary to the Democrat Party efforts to make it legal for illegal alien “inhabitants” to vote in future U.S. elections. Read the new definition here.

The ORIGINAL 1828 Definition of “citizen” includes “a freeman of a city, as distinguished from a foreigner, or one NOT entitled to its franchises.” The replacement (NIV) 1828 Dictionary omits this section of the original definition of citizen, with a clear intent. Today, the USA has more than 30 million “foreign inhabitants” properly referred to under the U.S. legal term “illegal alien.” While our government has allowed them to become “inhabitants,” they remain “foreigners NOT entitled to its franchises,” including but not limited to, voting rights. See false definition HERE

Who is responsible for this horrific act of blatant fraud designed to intentionally undermine the Charters of Freedom?



For just $24,500 you can own an authenticated true original copy of the very first American English Dictionary by Noah Webster. Does this tell you how important and valuable these books really are, especially to every American, as everything our country was founded upon came right from Noah Webster, one of our nation’s most important Founders.


The question is, why would anyone erase this from our history?

Why are both Holy Scripture and the Foundations of Freedom being deleted from the internet and erased so that no future American can ever properly understand their stated Faith, or the Foundations of Freedom and Liberty?

https://newswithviews.com/systematically-erasing-america/
Click to expand...
Stop making my point.

Wait..nevermind.

Keep at it. The whole world needs to know how big a Q-tard you are.
 
Tranny Jesus said:
Ball-Licker. ? That’s you! Picasso LOVES how you lick his balls. Like a good, obedient wife.
Click to expand...
I've let you get away with "balllicker" these past few days 'cause it's at the same level as "cocksucker" in the vernacular.

However, a couple o' times today you've described, using the verb, a member's sexual action on another member.

What did I say to you yesterday about dwelling close-to-the-line all the time? Law of large numbers will get you eventually bro', so why do it?

Take a day off to recalibrate. I suggest setting the red line for your rev counter 10% lower at least.
 
Aynirar27 said:
Honestly I have no idea what you are talking about, but it isn’t climate change
Click to expand...

Sure you don't haus. Everything Ive mentioned is working in concert with the climate change SCAM but you go ahead and play dumb. But youll be back acting like your schooling somebody.
 
Last edited:
hairydangler said:
Sure you don't haus. Everything Ive mentioned is working in concert with the climate change SCAM but you go ahead and play dumb. But youll be back acting like your schooling somebody.
Click to expand...
I really don’t dude. There is hundreds of years of evidence of human effects on the climate.
It’s nothing new and and it’s hardly debatable.
I agree it sucks that some use it to push an agenda, but it doesn’t make it any less true and it doesn’t make it a scam
 
SCAM!

If you believe it all you're just being the sheep you always are.

The planet is self protecting and self healing....always has been and still continues today.

Even if there were an adverse effect it would be so miniscule it's inconsequential.

REAL, honest and NON POLITICAL scientists say this themselves.

STOP being so gullible you dipshits.............FFS.
 
YabbaDabbaDoo said:
SCAM!

If you believe it all you're just being the sheep you always are.

The planet is self protecting and self healing....always has been and still continues today.

Even if there were an adverse effect it would be so miniscule it's inconsequential.

REAL, honest and NON POLITICAL scientists say this themselves.

STOP being so gullible you dipshits.............FFS.
Click to expand...

You are taking things way too literal.

Yes, the planet is self healing in the sense that it does not give a fuck what flora and fauna are around at any given time. Humans aren’t destroying the world. The planet will be just fine whether we are here nor not.

What are doing is affecting the very tiny window of acceptable climate for humans to continue living the way we want to.

If no one lived in flood plains, beach fronts and drought prone areas, climate change wouldn’t be a large threat.

If we only ate locally grown food and live stock, those naturally “flexible” areas would still be fine for a long while.

But that is not the world we live in.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top