Confirmed: Maxine has graphene in her vaccine

  • Thread starter Thread starter VonBonfire
  • Start date Start date
Racerxrated said:
....Aand there's your sign.

Reading an article, becoming scared and freaked out(rightly so after reading it), doesn't PROVE anything. Just more "Let's read as much stuff on the internet as we can; we're BOUND to find something that proves the vaccine is the devil's work!!! Mwuahahahaha...."

As I've always said, get the vax, don't get the vax; doesn't matter to me one bit. But rolling out some article that isn't proof of anything, it's not a study(which, btw, has to be REPLICATED TWICE to be considered a real thing; that's how science works) is just another anti vaxxer BBBUT BBUT LOOK AT THIS!!! SEE SEE!!! line of bullshit.

Still waiting for all my fellow co workers to have ANY clot issue, Carditis, yada yada yada. Funny, all 140 of us are still super healthy. And, to be sure they'd be shouting it from the rooftops as I work in the Northwoods here with at least half of them anti vaxxers.
Crazy right?
Right.
Click to expand...
There’s proof of enough to know it’s a losing proposition. It’s roulette homes. There’s no upside and potential catastrophe. Did you see this? Sounds like your heart was injured whether you know it or not: https://www.igor-chudov.com/p/covid-vaccines-damage-all-hearts I’d be pretty upset if I were you.
 
Racerxrated said:
https://www.reuters.com/article/fac...s-do-not-contain-graphene-oxide-idUSL1N2OZ14F

As I said, more FAKE NEWS. Nothing to see here, except the clowns who WANT to see something.
Anything, really.
What a joke.
:hys::hys:
Click to expand...

Statement of Significance​

Due to its unique physicochemical properties, graphene oxide is widely employed in medicine for purposes of photothermal treatment of cancer, drug delivery, antibacterial therapy, and medical imaging. Our work describes the surface modification of graphene oxide and for the first time summarizes that functionalized graphene oxide serves as a vaccine carrier and shows significant adjuvant activity in activating cellular and humoral immunity. In the future, it is expected to be introduced into vaccine research to improve the efficacy of vaccines.

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1742706120303305?via=ihub
 
denialist said:
There’s proof of enough to know it’s a losing proposition. It’s roulette homes. There’s no upside and potential catastrophe. Did you see this? Sounds like your heart was injured whether you know it or not: https://www.igor-chudov.com/p/covid-vaccines-damage-all-hearts I’d be pretty upset if I were you.
Click to expand...
Ooh look more fake news.

You clowns are certainly good at re posting this shit. I'll give you that much.

Oh, and btw I did have 'immeasurable' myocarditis...after COVID though, NOT the vaccine. And, I did have follow up cardiac ultrasound a year later and NO injury, or change in my heart was noted.
By then, I had the vax.
Let me repeat, my heart had NO change or issue.

But you clowns go! Keep posting natl enquirer shit and saying it's real!
:hys: :hys: :hys: :ROFLMAO: :ROFLMAO:
 
Racerxrated said:
Ooh look more fake news.

You clowns are certainly good at re posting this shit. I'll give you that much.

Oh, and btw I did have 'immeasurable' myocarditis...after COVID though, NOT the vaccine. And, I did have follow up cardiac ultrasound a year later and NO injury, or change in my heart was noted.
By then, I had the vax.
Let me repeat, my heart had NO change or issue.

But you clowns go! Keep posting natl enquirer shit and saying it's real!
:hys: :hys: :hys: :ROFLMAO: :ROFLMAO:
Click to expand...
Read the study.
 
Krull said:

Statement of Significance​

Due to its unique physicochemical properties, graphene oxide is widely employed in medicine for purposes of photothermal treatment of cancer, drug delivery, antibacterial therapy, and medical imaging. Our work describes the surface modification of graphene oxide and for the first time summarizes that functionalized graphene oxide serves as a vaccine carrier and shows significant adjuvant activity in activating cellular and humoral immunity. In the future, it is expected to be introduced into vaccine research to improve the efficacy of vaccines.

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1742706120303305?via=ihub
Click to expand...
HAHAHAHA! it says "in the future" fool.

That means 'not now' in case you don't understand.
Mental midgets some of you. Wow.
 
Racerxrated said:
HAHAHAHA! it says "in the future" fool.

That means 'not now' in case you don't understand.
Mental midgets some of you. Wow.
Click to expand...
HAHAHAHA! The vaccine was experimental, fool

That means you don't know what the fuck you took.

And BTW, that scientific paper was published August 2020. ?
 
Last edited:
Racerxrated said:
....Aand there's your sign.

Reading an article, becoming scared and freaked out(rightly so after reading it), doesn't PROVE anything. Just more "Let's read as much stuff on the internet as we can; we're BOUND to find something that proves the vaccine is the devil's work!!! Mwuahahahaha...."

As I've always said, get the vax, don't get the vax; doesn't matter to me one bit. But rolling out some article that isn't proof of anything, it's not a study(which, btw, has to be REPLICATED TWICE to be considered a real thing; that's how science works) is just another anti vaxxer BBBUT BBUT LOOK AT THIS!!! SEE SEE!!! line of bullshit.

Still waiting for all my fellow co workers to have ANY clot issue, Carditis, yada yada yada. Funny, all 140 of us are still super healthy. And, to be sure they'd be shouting it from the rooftops as I work in the Northwoods here with at least half of them anti vaxxers.
Crazy right?
Right.
Click to expand...
two seperate dudes that I worked with had mini strokes within 10 minutes of receiving their shots. This was at a federal prison with a medical department luckily. Both in shape and early to mid 30's....they were both vets who did time in the stan so not sure if that had anything to do with it.
 
VonBonfire said:
For now. You hope.
Click to expand...
denialist said:
Read the study.
Click to expand...
I read Dr Bluemke of U of Wi at Madison, who 'Igor' also quotes.....here it is...

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8369879/

It's really funny, what you guys run to and point "SEE SEE !!! LOOK LOOK!!!"
But when you actually read what Dr Bluemke's study IS, it talks about heart injury AFTER COVID INFECTION, NOT THE VACCINE.

Good Ole Igor simply created a fake news headline; which is par for the course with you dipshits. It's really funny shit, you morons try to push 'But critical thinking! Critical thinking!!' When NONE of you could critical think your way out of a wet paper bag.

All you have to do is use google to find the original actual study by Dr Bluemke, and see its NOT about the vaccine...and then you see how part of that study was cropped and altered(the headline lol) and then it makes sense...good ol Igor created his own fake document.
You dudes are seriously mentally challenged to fall for this shit.
:ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO::hys::hys::hys:
 
JackBootedThug said:
two seperate dudes that I worked with had mini strokes within 10 minutes of receiving their shots. This was at a federal prison with a medical department luckily. Both in shape and early to mid 30's....they were both vets who did time in the stan so not sure if that had anything to do with it.
Click to expand...

That’s the kind of stuff that worries me, the mixing and matching of different vaccines. I know a bunch of dudes that served that got pumped full of god knows what.
Injection A may be safe and injection B might by safe, but AB might make your heart explode.
 
Krull said:
HAHAHAHA! The vaccine was experimental, fool

That means you don't know what the fuck you took.

And BTW, that scientific paper was published August 2020. ?
Click to expand...
What 'scientific' paper are you referring to exactly?
 
Racerxrated said:
I read Dr Bluemke of U of Wi at Madison, who 'Igor' also quotes.....here it is...

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8369879/

It's really funny, what you guys run to and point "SEE SEE !!! LOOK LOOK!!!"
But when you actually read what Dr Bluemke's study IS, it talks about heart injury AFTER COVID INFECTION, NOT THE VACCINE.

Good Ole Igor simply created a fake news headline; which is par for the course with you dipshits. It's really funny shit, you morons try to push 'But critical thinking! Critical thinking!!' When NONE of you could critical think your way out of a wet paper bag.

All you have to do is use google to find the original actual study by Dr Bluemke, and see its NOT about the vaccine...and then you see how part of that study was cropped and altered(the headline lol) and then it makes sense...good ol Igor created his own fake document.
You dudes are seriously mentally challenged to fall for this shit.
:ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO::hys::hys::hys:
Click to expand...
Many of the studies I find are highly incomplete because they don’t include data BEFORE covid or vaccine. Sure they may have discovered a condition after someone was vaccinated, but if they didn’t test for that condition before the vaccine, it doesn’t mean a whole lot.
Not every study is like this, but far too many are
 
yeah that's what I think happened to them. Just positive on a certain set of conditions. Also had another buddy who was a marine in the first gulf war...he was actually on the 2nd humvee to enter Iraq. He contracted that gulf war sickness. It fuckin destroyed him over a few years. It was shockingly bad. He was a fuckin monster when I first met him. Then turned into skeletor eventually.
 
Krull said:
The one I linked several times already. ?

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1742706120303305?via=ihub
Click to expand...
Ok, just wanna make sure I'm reading what you are referring to.....so, you are basically saying that, because this is from 2020, and the article stated that 'in the future' etc etc, that this graphene is OF COURSE BEING USED IN THE COVID VAX!!! Right? Ya ok.

You aren't using your critical thinking skills here buddy...you have no proof. You simply "ASSUME" because 'LOOK LOOK THEY TALKED ABOUT IT IN 2020!!! THEY HAVE TO BE USING IT RIGHT???????

:hys: :hys: :ROFLMAO: :ROFLMAO:

You have no proof, at all. You simply look for ANYTHING and EVERYTHING that you can spin into some horror story. "But they talked about it!!! They HAVE to be using it right??? RIGHT?????"
Wrong.
Extraordinary claims need extraordinary proof.
And you have NONE.
Nothing to see here except more retarded anti vax clowns reaching for ANYTHING and EVERYTHING to try and prove their narrative.
Thanks for the laughs, clown.
:ROFLMAO::hys:
 
denialist said:
Why, are you arguing that detectable heart inflammation doesn’t necessarily mean the heart was damaged?
Click to expand...
Not at all. The study by Dr Bluemke was NOT about the vaccine; it's about COVID itself.
Igor changed the headline of the COVID study. To make it look like a study about the Vaccine.
Simple fake news, anyone with half a brain can see it.
Maybe you can't?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top