Then give me a link to the actual study...NOT Igor's bullshit page. That page doesn't like to a study..just a cut n paste of a front page of a study, which is exactly like the Dr Bluemke bullshit cut n paste that was altered as I proved.
It's linked in the first sentence of the article: https://pubs.rsna.org/doi/10.1148/radiol.230743 They measured 18F-FDG uptake and found it was higher across the board in the vaccinated cohort. The significance is debatable perhaps, but at the very least it shows the heart is being affected. However, this paper concludes: Focal myocardial 18F-FDG uptake seen on oncologic PET/CT indicates a significantly increased risk for multiple myocardial abnormalities.
No, he quoted Bluemke from here, not the study you posted: https://pubs.rsna.org/doi/full/10.1148/radiol.232244
So we've got a Spanish scientist whose preliminary findings indicate the presence of GA, the industry seems to like it as a adjuvant, FDA docs say it's used in the manufacturing process, but you're a conspiracy theorist for being concerned. ?
I've determined that all vaccines are bad. People pull the polio card, but look into it and it's full of holes. Tetanus for example was already decreasing thanks to better wound care. So it's kind of like covid. Claim there is a huge problem among the medical mainstream and media, offer a solution, and stack that paper for yourself and the other big pharma dope dealers. It's all graft.
This stands out most to me.... "A prospective study would be needed to validate the findings of this study, including comparisons with cardiac enzyme levels, cardiac function, and non-mRNA vaccination."
The problem is, you guys run to type up this that and the other thing, but without actual proof or confirmation.
That sounds so promising.
Like the warp speed vaccines will save us from the "pandemic of the century".
I had Myocarditis. Un measurable on a cardiac ultrasound. Went away on its own, after about a month where I had intermittent symptoms.
You realize that some of the inconsistencies with adverse affects could be related to the variations in lots right? Or maybe you guys got lucky and had some stuff that was neutralized because it was stored improperly, above temp. Or maybe you have a ticking time bomb ticker. Who knows, and no one in power wants to find out.
Haha yeah there's that...but I'm not defending the vaccine, or the Government..I'm simply calling bullshit on claims that aren't proven at all....some of you RUN TO POST total crap and BS as being TRUTH...
Well I meant to tell you earlier in another vax thread, but didn't want to make you feel like I was brown nosing you....I read your posts about having the myocarditis and just want to say I am very glad you are ok. Your opinion on the vaccine is crap but that stands outside from my thankfulness that you have good health now. After all you are a fellow guitar picking fool like myself. So I guess what I mean is that any of my posts that come off as jerk posts, which is most of them, have no bearing on the fact that I am glad you are here to share your opinions with me and others whether we agree or not.
You do realize that things you claim aren't proven right?
Thank you. And, yes I think your opinion on the vax is based on fake news. But, you do you. Time will tell on the long term effects that the vax doesn't have/has; since 270 million have had it at this point.
My views are based on the fact that it is good and right to be distrustful of any and all government officials. Lefties and hippies taught me to question everything and to distrust the man so I don't need any news. I once had brand new fancy shoes and clothes and what I thought was a good friend took me out to a mud pit and got 'em all messed just to spite me so why should I trust any of those people either? My street senses were triggered by endless intimidation, coercion, and cult like chants of "safe and effective".
There are different reported rates of adverse event reports per lot, the analysis has been done. It's also known that the mrna needs to be stored at proper temp. I do agree it's good to read the studies, not simply sensationalistic headlines. My point was that it's intentional to not investigate these matters conclusively when there is so much suggestive evidence.
Like what fake news?
Anything playing on a tv set qualifies.
It's all fun and games till the truth slowly comes out ?Ok, just wanna make sure I'm reading what you are referring to.....so, you are basically saying that, because this is from 2020, and the article stated that 'in the future' etc etc, that this graphene is OF COURSE BEING USED IN THE COVID VAX!!! Right? Ya ok.
You aren't using your critical thinking skills here buddy...you have no proof. You simply "ASSUME" because 'LOOK LOOK THEY TALKED ABOUT IT IN 2020!!! THEY HAVE TO BE USING IT RIGHT???????
You have no proof, at all. You simply look for ANYTHING and EVERYTHING that you can spin into some horror story. "But they talked about it!!! They HAVE to be using it right??? RIGHT?????"
Wrong.
Extraordinary claims need extraordinary proof.
And you have NONE.
Nothing to see here except more retarded anti vax clowns reaching for ANYTHING and EVERYTHING to try and prove their narrative.
Thanks for the laughs, clown.