Confirmed: Maxine has graphene in her vaccine

  • Thread starter Thread starter VonBonfire
  • Start date Start date
Thumbpicker said:
Because you know better than the subject matter experts.
Click to expand...
IMG_7035.jpeg
 
It’s so tragic that the US has largely become a mindless and weak sheople that can’t think or act for themselves. I guess all the vaccines, TV, fast food and public education worked. ??
 
Funny that I was accused of being a coward when you antivaxxers are afraid of taking the vaccine and cancer. The irony is thick. Bock Bock Bock Bock... chickens ??????
 
denialist said:
It’s so tragic that the US has largely become a mindless and weak sheople that can’t think or act for themselves. I guess all the vaccines, TV, fast food and public education worked. ??
Click to expand...
It blows my mind that they are willing to inject something designed using aborted fetal cells into their veins and not only that, but to defend and advocate for it.
 
denialist said:
It’s so tragic that the US has largely become a mindless and weak sheople that can’t think or act for themselves. I guess all the vaccines, TV, fast food and public education worked. ??
Click to expand...
“Thinking for yourself” would be “I don’t want to get that vaccine”

Thinking other people shouldn’t is basically none of your damn business. You aren’t exercising your freedom, you are kind of just acting wanton
 
VonBonfire said:
It blows my mind that they are willing to inject something designed using aborted fetal cells into their veins and not only that, but to defend and advocate for it.
Click to expand...
Scared huh - bit of cowardice there... oooh I'm afraid of a needle... oooo I might get turned into a newt... :p
 
Thumbpicker said:
Scared huh - bit of cowardice there... oooh I'm afraid of a needle... oooo I might get turned into a newt... :p
Click to expand...
You might get the fungus in your lungus. Keep your door locked, and your curtains drawn maybe you'll live forever.
 
Aynirar27 said:
Not how science works bro.
Click to expand...
“I want to pause here and talk about this notion of consensus, and the rise of what has been called consensus science. I regard consensus science as an extremely pernicious development that ought to be stopped cold in its tracks. Historically, the claim of consensus has been the first refuge of scoundrels; it is a way to avoid debate by claiming that the matter is already settled. Whenever you hear the consensus of scientists agrees on something or other, reach for your wallet, because you’re being had.

“Let’s be clear: the work of science has nothing whatever to do with consensus. Consensus is the business of politics. Science, on the contrary, requires only one investigator who happens to be right, which means that he or she has results that are verifiable by reference to the real world. In science consensus is irrelevant. What is relevant is reproducible results. The greatest scientists in history are great precisely because they broke with the consensus.

“There is no such thing as consensus science. If it’s consensus, it isn’t science. If it’s science, it isn’t consensus. Period.”

Michael Crichton
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top