OK, what's next?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Dave M
  • Start date Start date
That's not entirely true space boy. Yes, scientists aren't above bias or politics, and studies and statistics can be manipulated or fabricated. I don't believe in a flat earth. I'm agnostic.

It is 100 percent true.
 
That's not entirely true space boy. Yes, scientists aren't above bias or politics, and studies and statistics can be manipulated or fabricated. I don't believe in a flat earth. I'm agnostic.

I'll give you this, can there be some abuse, and bullshit in science? Yes, of course, it's just part of human nature. We can't 100% eliminate that in any field.

The problem is finding one instance of abuse cannot be used to disqualify the whole system.

Too many times this is used to disqualify, the Gov, the Police, the Gays, Science, Republicans, Democrats, etc......
 
I wasn’t agreeing with the dumb crap you wrote. I was saying that I was 100% correct that your idea of science is tweets and YouTube thumbnails
Boooooo! How many scientific studies have you posted to support your dumb Reddit scientism cliches?
 
I dunno what you mean by this "Ass wiping science" :unsure:

See aynirar post 361. Dan the Everything is Science Man, Man.

If I talk about blowing bubbles he's the kind of guy who will tell me "it's science" when really I don't give a damn the way he doesn't give a damn if I post "oh that's God's will for your life" every time he mentions something happening to him. At some point it just aggravates people whether it is science, or God's will. The net effect is being a damn nuisance.
 
iu
 
Boooooo! How many scientific studies have you posted to support your dumb Reddit scientism cliches?

Lol the fact that you call 2000 year theories and data “Reddit cliches” either proved my point
 
I'll give you this, can there be some abuse, and bullshit in science? Yes, of course, it's just part of human nature. We can't 100% eliminate that in any field.

The problem is finding one instance of abuse cannot be used to disqualify the whole system.
Well I never claimed it did. At all. I'm against the veneration of science above all else.
 
See aynirar post 361. Dan the Everything is Science Man, Man.

If I talk about blowing bubbles he's the kind of guy who will tell me "it's science" when really I don't give a damn the way he doesn't give a damn if I post "oh that's God's will for your life" every time he mentions something happening to him. At some point it just aggravates people whether it is science, or God's will. The net effect is being a damn nuisance.
The bubble is a result of atmospheric pressure, the force you are blowing air into the bubble, and the surface tension of the liquid.


Next?
 
Lol the fact that you call 2000 year theories and data “Reddit cliches” either proved my point
It's not the particular theory, space boy, it's the veneration, devotion, worship of science, scientists, technology, "Progress" and the associated "Secular" norms, customs, values, etc.
 
Science let you motherfuckers live past 40, and own a god damn digital device that connects to a worldwide computer network to try and debunk science.

Science says, you're welcome :hys:
And nukes, AI skynet too. The internet will probably be the end of us. And PS, the only living past 40 because of "science" is total BS.
 
Back
Top