
Dan Gleesak
Well-known member
Well, it sounds like you have never looked into it then, which doesn't surprise me at all.
whatever you gotta tell yourself man
Well, it sounds like you have never looked into it then, which doesn't surprise me at all.
Okay, then tell me how a flat earther would explain it.whatever you gotta tell yourself man
I say that every time I the record button.whatever you gotta tell yourself man
Okay, then tell me how a flat earther would explain it.
Okay, but what I’m asking is for you to give an example of an FE model that can’t explain a certain phenomena that the heliocentric one can, or where the geocentric model clearly contradicts other easily verified natural phenomena. Like say if the sun rotated around the earth, wouldn’t we at least see some light at any given time? Or if the moon is a disc why does the shadow look like it does? Those sorts of things… In other words, you challenge an aspect of the FE model and I’ll see if I can’t answer it.The most popular “explanation” is that the sun revolves or moves around the earth and not the other way around.
Thank you for that. But I do hope that was AI and not youan atheist democrat walks into a bar, bartender says 'what are you having,' atheist democrat says 'an alcoholic beverage lol i'm gonna go to hell high five'
bartender then proceeds to fuck himself with a sports car it was really quite impressive
Next you'll be arguing that the diesel fuel guzzling trucks, tractors and farms should just be outlawed due to Co2 and methane emissions because we don't need farms since food is already in the stores.....................![]()
I'm going to have to challenge you on this one friend. The belief that we exist on a spinning ball held in place by an invisible force flying through an infinite void at thousands of miles an hour is entirely abstract to our real-world, day to day experience. It would not be my first guess anyways. Have you ever hear of Occam's razor?
View attachment 272070
No ding dong. Gravity, duh!Let me guess, you think we should fly off the spinning ball? Is that it?
No ding dong. Gravity, duh!
Okay, but what I’m asking is for you to give an example of an FE model that can’t explain a certain phenomena that the heliocentric one can, or where the geocentric model clearly contradicts other easily verified natural phenomena. Like say if the sun rotated around the earth, wouldn’t we at least see some light at any given time? Or if the moon is a disc why does the shadow look like it does? Those sorts of things… In other words, you challenge an aspect of the FE model and I’ll see if I can’t answer it.
He doesn’t have one. He’s going to keep asking me questions until I make a grammatical error and then keep bringing it up for weeks on endSo what's your point then?
You didn't end your last sentence with a period.He doesn’t have one. He’s going to keep asking me questions until I make a grammatical error and then keep bringing it up for weeks on end
That’s not true. I don’t look for witty tricks and gotchyas like you do. If you don’t want to do the exercise, fine, but I think it’d be illuminating.He doesn’t have one. He’s going to keep asking me questions until I make a grammatical error and then keep bringing it up for weeks on end
Want to start with this?They don’t explain hurricanes, they don’t explain why our sun would rotate around us and they certainly don’t explain why every other star in the universe has planets orbiting around it, and not the other way around.
There isn’t one that explains seasons, or eclipses, or why different parts of the world can see different stars than others.
Want to start with this?
*yourYou didn't end your last sentence with a period.
You didn't end your last sentence with a period.