Where will we be in 250 years?

[Dan Gleesak]

I had to divert to Walmart, after this here fiasco.

?

I can’t remember the last time I saw a Walmart either

 

[Ben Waylin]

Is the Smithsonian not reputable enough for you?

Hell no !

They take all the Nephilim skeletons and lock them in a basement, then lie about ever seeing them.

 

[Dan Gleesak]

Hell no !

They take all the Nephilim skeletons and lock them in a basement, then lie about ever seeing them.

 

[Bad Brain]

I already posted one. Is the Smithsonian not reputable enough for you?

That’s when I asked why you think the trend will continue and you kinda flipped.

 

[Dan Gleesak]

That’s when I asked why you think the trend will continue and you kinda flipped.

Actually it was because you started up with your usual leading question inference bullshit you always do.
I state, in this very thread, that the lunar shift and us exiting an ice age as my reason for thinking tides will get higher, and you ask me why I think it is man made and how we can reverse it.

 

[VonBonfire]

I state, in this very thread, that the lunar shift and us exiting an ice age as my reason for thinking tides will get higher, and you ask me why I think it is man made and how we can reverse it.

What you really mean to say is the sky is falling.

 

[Ben Waylin]

Actually it was because you started up with your usual leading question inference bullshit you always do.
I state, in this very thread, that the lunar shift and us exiting an ice age as my reason for thinking tides will get higher, and you ask me why I think it is man made and how we can reverse it.

We can control the weather by eating bugs.

It's science, man !

WTF ?

 

[Dan Gleesak]

What you really mean to say is the sky is falling.

I said people would move a few miles inland, not that the world would end

 

[Bad Brain]

Actually it was because you started up with your usual leading question inference bullshit you always do.
I state, in this very thread, that the lunar shift and us exiting an ice age as my reason for thinking tides will get higher, and you ask me why I think it is man made and how we can reverse it.

I hadn’t seen your lunar tide theory. So you don’t think climate change is causing the sea level to rise?

 

[VonBonfire]

I said people would move a few miles inland, not that the world would end

Or just make taller seawalls so maybe the sky will be held up better.

 

[Ben Waylin]

Or just make taller seawalls so maybe the sky will be held up better.

They already tried that at the tower of Babel.

?

 

[Dan Gleesak]

I hadn’t seen your lunar tide theory. So you don’t think climate change is causing the sea level to rise?

It’s not really a theory, it happens pretty regularly.
And yes, polar ice is melting every year, by the billions of tons. That affects ocean levels.

Or just make taller seawalls

That’s a possibility too. shoulda led with that instead of being a dickhead

 

[VonBonfire]

And yes, polar ice is melting every year, by the billions of tons. That affects ocean levels.

The ice melts in my drink the water doesn't raise.

 

[Dan Gleesak]

The ice melts in my drink the water doesn't raise.

Not the same thing, but yes you are correct.

 

[VonBonfire]

Not the same thing, but yes you are correct.

That is the only simple observation I need to discard your rising sea levels theory. Science says there is mucho water in very deep underground aquifers so rising sea levels=much ado about nothing. Anything could happen. The fountains of the deep could burst forth and make the southwest USA an inland sea again. I heard there was great fishing there back then. Some real lunkers.

 

[Laputan Machine]

Why aren’t ice core samples an acceptable way to see climate variances?

They aren't accurate enough to compare to data collected in the past 20 years. It's comparing something a bit fuzzy to something very accurate (even though they game them on top of that).
I have an NOAA temp station about 300 feet from my house. I've noticed it throws away outlier very cold days and essentially inputs fake data. IE once it was -17F out, I went on their site and looked what that station was showing and it said it was 5F out.

 

[Dan Gleesak]

That is the only simple observation I need to discard your rising sea levels theory. Science says there is mucho water in very deep underground aquifers so rising sea levels=much ado about nothing. Anything could happen. The fountains of the deep could burst forth and make the southwest USA an inland sea again. I heard there was great fishing there back then. Some real lunkers.

Have you seen a glacier? They don’t sit even with the water level. If you put a block of ice in your drink that is a foot taller than the glass, do you not think the level would rise when it melts?

Even if you want ti ignore displacement, a lot of ice that melts is off of land, not just some floating block of ice.

 

[Dan Gleesak]

They aren't accurate enough to compare to data collected in the past 20 years. It's comparing something a bit fuzzy to something very accurate (even though they game them on top of that).
I have an NOAA temp station about 300 feet from my house. I've noticed it throws away outlier very cold days and essentially inputs fake data. IE once it was -17F out, I went on their site and looked what that station was showing ant it said it was 5F out.

Would they be comparable to samples taken today? Core samples aren’t “taking the temperature” of something. They aren’t temping the ice.

I mean I agree that the climate estimations if millions of years ago aren’t going to be as accurate as of yesterday, but you are comparing apples and oranges here

 

[japetus]

Have you seen a glacier?

I have not in person but they seem cool

 

[Dan Gleesak]

I have not in person but they seem cool

well me either, but I’ve seen pictures of them. Maybe they are just another NASA hoax though. Seems to be the go to defense for some