Hey RT fuck bois

  • Thread starter Thread starter Dan Gleesak
  • Start date Start date
no worries. Red Square is ready to nuke outer space anyway
 
Aynirar27 said:
5:49 eastern time Thursday is the scheduled landing
Click to expand...
eMu3pZw.jpg
 
I mean, it's admitted. The only "Conspiracy" about it is whether these programs are already active, which again, I believe is supported.

"In 2023, the White House issued research guidelines for injecting reflective particles into the atmosphere and brightening clouds, concluding that the technologies offer the possibility of cooling the planet but also carry unknown risks, such as depleting the protective ozone layer, harming marine life, damaging crops or altering rainfall patterns."

"Three field experiments are under way in the U.S. and overseas."

https://archive.is/mqZGi
 
The contention is that these programs are already altering climate and polluting the world, thus the need to create a story (Manmade climate change) and the "Solution" — what they've already been doing.
 
acceptance said:
Yeah, I believe governments have geoengineering programs with arial dispersal of reflective particulates like alumnium, barium and I believe strontium. I don't see how we can have a discussion about climate change without addressing this. There is sufficient evidence IMO that this is the case.
Click to expand...

I don’t believe there is really evidence at all. I would love to hear some though. Break it down for me in a a succinct paragraph. Is there actual data that shows a meaningful percentage of these things in our air?

It just seems so weird that there is this huge push to repair our ozone, and it is actually working, why would the “dimmers” not jump on board with that? It would accomplish the same thing
 
acceptance said:
I mean, it's admitted. The only "Conspiracy" about it is whether these programs are already active, which again, I believe is supported.

"In 2023, the White House issued research guidelines for injecting reflective particles into the atmosphere and brightening clouds, concluding that the technologies offer the possibility of cooling the planet but also carry unknown risks, such as depleting the protective ozone layer, harming marine life, damaging crops or altering rainfall patterns."

"Three field experiments are under way in the U.S. and overseas."

https://archive.is/mqZGi
Click to expand...
Is this any different than cloud seeding? I mean even the dude you are so against in that video right out said that it’s been going on. I’m not sure who is denying that. If that’s the case, call it what it is and has been
 
Aynirar27 said:
Is this any different than cloud seeding? I mean the dude you are so against in that video right out said that it’s been going on. I’m not sure who is denying that. If that’s the case, call it what it is and has been
Click to expand...
No it's different than cloud seeding. We're talking about aerosolized metallic nano-particulates with the intent to block/reflect sunlight.
 
acceptance said:
The contention is that these programs are already altering climate and polluting the world, thus the need to create a story (Manmade climate change) and the "Solution" — what they've already been doing.
Click to expand...
ya see, you are always worrying about the story. Forgot the story. Focus on the facts and use your brain. Shit would make a lot more sense to ya
 
acceptance said:
No it's different than cloud seeding. We're talking about aerosolized metallic nano-particulates with the intent to block/reflect sunlight.
Click to expand...
ok so if they made up global warming to have an excuse to cool the planet...why are they cooling the planet? why are they dimming something that doesn't need to be dimmed? I really don't see where any of this is going
 
Aynirar27 said:
ok so if they made up global warming to have an excuse to cool the planet...why are they cooling the planet? why are they dimming something that doesn't need to be dimmed? I really don't see where any of this is going
Click to expand...
I don't try to speculate about motivations, but what I'm saying is that they likely caused the problem — to the extent it exists — not with car pollution and cow farts but with this technology itself.
 
acceptance said:
I don't try to speculate about motivations, but what I'm saying is that they likely caused the problem — to the extent it exists — not with car pollution and cow farts but with this technology itself.
Click to expand...

I mean I guess you can think that but you are comparing a spoonful of evidence to a literal mountain of evidence to global warming. The thing about GW is that if you take away the “story”, every bit of evidence still makes sense. There is is nothing contrary to the effects of CO2 in the atmosphere.

To tie it back to this thread, why is Venus hotter than Mercury?? Because it has an atmosphere loaded with co2. It’s universal.
 
People and their bs.
It's no wonder everything is collapsing.
More "matter of facts" from psuedos.
Give me a fucking break, already.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top