Hey RT fuck bois

  • Thread starter Thread starter Dan Gleesak
  • Start date Start date
Aynirar27 said:
I don’t have many to share lol. It was the day I got the amp so I had to try out the effects. Reverb tank was busted unfortunately.

I just got this today so maybe I can record some more stuff without the headaches. That’s if I can stay up later than my children

View attachment 292658
Click to expand...
What were you using before? Why this one?
 
acceptance said:
Because they are brighter ding dong.
Click to expand...
There ya go. Just because the moon has no atmosphere doesn’t mean your eyes (or camera) are going to pick up things pale in comparison to the sun. Think of it like light pollution but instead of a city in the distance it’s the fucking sun blasting you in the face
 
VonBonfire said:
I'm trying to figure out what the crayolas have to do with recording but I suppose they are a good start to some decent album artwork. I prefer permanent stuff myself but my kids are older.
Click to expand...
That’s just my failed attempt at a dinner table that only holds arts and crafts and mail
 
Aynirar27 said:
There ya go. Just because the moon has no atmosphere doesn’t mean your eyes (or camera) area going to pick up things pale in comparison to the sun. Think of it like light pollution but instead of a city in the distance it’s the fucking sun blasting you in the face
Click to expand...
Yeah but theoretically star gazing should be absolutely incredible there but I suppose the nighttime galaxy is hard to fake when you are staging a moon landing in a fancy studio someplace.
 
VonBonfire said:
Yeah but theoretically star gazing should be absolutely incredible there but I suppose the nighttime galaxy is hard to fake when you are staging a moon landing in a fancy studio someplace.
Click to expand...
If you aren’t looking towards the sun yes it would probably be amazing. Unfortunately the dark side is like 200 degrees below zero

There are wonderful pictures taken by Apollo missions of stars but in UV light so they can actually been seen
 
Aynirar27 said:
There ya go. Just because the moon has no atmosphere doesn’t mean your eyes (or camera) aren’t going to pick up things pale in comparison to the sun. Think of it like light pollution but instead of a city in the distance it’s the fucking sun blasting you in the face
Click to expand...
No you don't get it. The sun reflects off the atmosphere which is usually brighter than the moon and stars. It doesn't matter whether it's day or night on the moon because there is no atmosphere and thus nothing to reflect and obscure the stars. That's why the "daytime" sky is black. To VB's point, while they couldn't before, they probably could manage recreating the stars in the "proper" positions with computers now. But that would bring up questions about the previous lack of stars, and also give more evidence to scrutinize for error, so instead they leave it black, say the cameras weren't working, someone forgot the switch, it got tipped funny, they never wanted pictures anyways and so on.
 
Aynirar27 said:
If you aren’t looking towards the sun yes it would probably be amazing. Unfortunately the dark side is like 200 degrees below zero

There are wonderful pictures taken by Apollo missions of stars but in UV light so they can actually been seen
Click to expand...
Shouldn't be a problem with a good spacesuit but we probably "lost" that technology too.

I was impressed with Hubble at first until I learned they were just photoshopping colors into the pics to make them more interesting. So in other words, fake pics.
 
acceptance said:
No you don't get it. The sun reflects off the atmosphere which is usually brighter than the moon and stars. It doesn't matter whether it's day or night on the moon because there is no atmosphere and thus nothing to reflect and obscure the stars. That's why the "daytime" sky is black. To VB's point, while they couldn't before, they probably could manage recreating the stars in the "proper" positions with computers now. But that would bring up questions about the previous lack of stars, and also give more evidence to scrutinize for error, so instead they leave it black, say the cameras weren't working, someone forgot the switch, it got tipped funny, they never wanted pictures anyways and so on.
Click to expand...
Most showbiz curtains are always solid black so it was faster to just roll with what Kubrick's soundstage already had on site.
 
acceptance said:
No you don't get it. The sun reflects off the atmosphere which is usually brighter than the moon and stars. It doesn't matter whether it's day on the moon because there is no atmosphere and thus nothing to reflect and obscure the stars. That's why the "daytime" sky is black. To VB's point, while they couldn't before, they probably could manage recreating the stars in the "proper" positions with computers now. But that would bring up questions about the previous lack of stars, and also give more evidence to scrutinize for error, so instead they leave it black, say the cameras weren't working, someone forgot the switch, it got tipped funny, they never wanted pictures anyways and so on.
Click to expand...

The atmosphere does reflect light, but has very little to do with why you cant see stars during the day time, especially in photos.

I’ve read that astronauts could see faint stars if they stood in the shade and looked away from the sun the best they could.

As for the rest of your post, it’s just nonsense really
 
VonBonfire said:
Shouldn't be a problem with a good spacesuit but we probably "lost" that technology too.

I was impressed with Hubble at first until I learned they were just photoshopping colors into the pics to make them more interesting. So in other words, fake pics.
Click to expand...
lol no not fake pics. Often fake color yes, but not fake pics
 

Attachments

  • Screen Shot 2024-03-02 at 7.19.46 PM.jpg
    Screen Shot 2024-03-02 at 7.19.46 PM.jpg
    204 KB · Views: 32
"the stars that are visible from Earth are a million billion times less bright than the light from the sun, and millions of times fainter than that of the moon. The scattered light from the sun is so bright in our sky that it often overwhelms the starlight during the day, but not always the moon's reflected light."

yeah-science-gif-3104567459.gif
 
acceptance said:
"the stars that are visible from Earth are a million billion times less bright than the light from the sun, and millions of times fainter than that of the moon. The scattered light from the sun is so bright in our sky that it often overwhelms the starlight during the day, but not always the moon's reflected light."

View attachment 292703
Click to expand...

You were asking why we didn’t see stars in pictures taken from the moon. Stay on track
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top