Hey RT fuck bois

  • Thread starter Thread starter Dan Gleesak
  • Start date Start date
Aynirar27 said:
Don’t mistake your frantic googling for science lol
Click to expand...
I googled to show you why I'm right and your wrong according to your own "science"
The reason the stars should be visible from the moon is the same reason the moon would be always visible from the earth with no atmosphere, which it often is anyways even during the day.
 
acceptance said:
I googled to show you why I'm right and your wrong according to your own "science"
The reason the stars should be visible from the moon is the same reason the moon would be always visible from the earth with no atmosphere, which it often is anyways even during the day.
Click to expand...
Incorrect
 
VonBonfire said:
You posted that one before, Arch, lol. It's a decent sample though I could do without the effects. You should do a jam to slow blues backing track or something sometime. You'd probably do pretty good.
Click to expand...
That's not me, pinhead.

:ROFLMAO:
 
Aynirar27 said:
You were asking why we didn’t see stars in pictures taken from the moon. Stay on track
Click to expand...
Yes it's all a matter of cameras and how they work with exposure and dynamic range. Go into a forest with bright light and dark areas and if you get the bright areas with the correct exposure the rest of the forest will be underexposed and dark.

Of course these numpties will never understand that.
 
Arch Stanton said:
That's not me, pinhead.

:ROFLMAO:
Click to expand...

Thank goodness for that.
I'm not even sure that it's him, either.
He went from horndogging Zelda and Baby Metal to Starship Commander in the course of a few months.
Doesn't even talk the same, anymore.
...lol
:rolleyes:
 
NowYou'rePlayingWithPower said:
Thank goodness for that.
I'm not even sure that it's him, either.
He went from horndogging Zelda and Baby Metal to Starship Commander in the course of a few months.
Doesn't even talk the same, anymore.
...lol
:rolleyes:
Click to expand...
Lisa, you're the only one here I trust is a "real person".

giphy.gif
 
Thumbpicker said:
Yes it's all a matter of cameras and how they work with exposure and dynamic range. Go into a forest with bright light and dark areas and if you get the bright areas with the correct exposure the rest of the forest will be underexposed and dark.
Click to expand...
No, it's not that at all :ROFLMAO:
 
It's the same with taking photos of bright objects in the night sky from Earth. If you get the exposure of those objects right you won't get a photo of the fainter stars or even some of the brighter stars sometimes. I have done some Astrophotography and I built this telescope using CAD to design all the parts over the course of a year maybe 20 years ago. Listening to flat earthers carry on just makes me think they are complete dickwits.

1709432483953.png
 
acceptance said:
No, it's not that at all :ROFLMAO:
Click to expand...
Yes it is. The surface of the moon was bright and the stars were faint. To get the stars you'd have to completely overexpose the moon. The cameras and film the astronauts used didn't have that sort of dynamic range.
 
Thumbpicker said:
Yes it is. The surface of the moon was bright and the stars were faint. To get the stars you'd have to overexpose the moon.
Click to expand...
No, it's not that. Theoretically you could take a picture from the surface of the sun and still see the stars because there is no atmosphere to catch the light being emitted by the sun. The fact that the sky is BLACK is the giveaway. This shit is so elementary.
 
acceptance said:
Again, it's not that. Theoretically you could take a picture from the surface of the sun and still see the stars because there is no atmosphere to catch the light being emitted by the sun. The fact that the sky is BLACK is the giveaway. This shit is so elementary.
Click to expand...
Absolute rubbish. If you a camera with automatic exposure with half the frame that is bright and half the frame that is dark it will set the shutter speed to be to fast to see faint stuff. The atmosphere is irrelevant. A camera doesn't know if there is gas in the atmosphere or not.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top