Hey RT fuck bois

[Bad Brain]

she was using them to poke fun at me. She won’t admit that though, but I don’t know why. it’s clear as day

She wasn't "using them" at all, other than in a sentence, in a criticism directed at you. It seems to me that you're trying to spin it as an attack on your family. The criticism was directed at you, unless you want to argue that it implicates your wife for choosing or tolerating you, which is really a stretch.

 

[Bad Brain]

I don't get the hate

Have you ever debated him on anything of substance?

 

[Dan Gleesak]

I'm not sure that he does.

I’ll play in the mud just the same as everyone else. I just don’t bring other people’s families in to it for no reason.

 

[Thumbpicker]

She wasn't "using them" at all, other than in a sentence, in a criticism directed at you. It seems to me that you're trying to spin it as an attack on your family. The criticism was directed at you, unless you want to argue that it implicates your wife for choosing or tolerating you, which is really a stretch.

What she said went beyond "poking fun". It was the type of mean bitch stuff that drives girls on social media to suicide. She has made an enemy out of me. She attacked his "manhood", went for the jugular re: his relationships and wife. Carried on about him not being a good father and criticised him for posting here (ironic btw). Nasty stuff.

 

[Dan Gleesak]

She wasn't "using them" at all, other than in a sentence, in a criticism directed at you. It seems to me that you're trying to spin it as an attack on your family. The criticism was directed at you, unless you want to argue that it implicates your wife for choosing or tolerating you, which is really a stretch.

Dude that is literally what I’ve said like a dozen fucking times lol. I’ve said it as “using my family as ammo” and also “using my family as fodder to insult me”. Every way I can imagine it lol.

She won’t even admit to what you just said though, even when I spell it out for her.

 

[Thumbpicker]

Dude that is literally what I’ve said like a dozen fucking times lol. I’ve said it as “using my family as ammo” and also “using my family as fodder to insult me”. Every way I can imagine it lol.

She won’t even admit to what you just said though, even when I spell it out for her.

Why do you think I'm carrying on about it. I think it's wrong mate. Also I don't think you deserve it.

 

[Bad Brain]

I’ve said it as “using my family as ammo” and also “using my family as fodder to insult me”. Every way I can imagine it lol.

They’re not being used as fodder and that’s the confusion. There is no injustice or harm being done to them. That you have a family and arguably should be tending to them instead of being online was the basis for the criticism. I am not even saying the criticism was worthwhile, I’m just saying that she wasn’t “Using” your family in the way you’re implying, that it was an insult to them or something.

 

[Bad Brain]

For all I know you’re the greatest dad ever. Like I said, I think it was a bit below the waist, but also fair game as you brought them into the convo and fights can get dirty online, as you know.

 

[Bad Brain]

I will also point out that while you’re making a big deal out of this perceived injustice and trying to get her to see how you were offended, I don’t think I’ve once heard you ask or try to understand what made NYPWP angry in the first place. Obviously she didn’t retaliate that way out of the blue.

 

[Dan Gleesak]

They’re not being used as fodder and that’s the confusion. There is no injustice or harm being done to them. That you have a family and arguably should be tending to them instead of being online was the basis for the criticism. I am not even saying the criticism was worthwhile, I’m just saying that she wasn’t “Using” your family in the way you’re implying, that it was an insult to them or something.

that is pretty much the definition of fodder lol. I have never once implied that I thought she insulted them. Just the opposite actually.

 

[Thumbpicker]

Obviously she didn’t retaliate that way out of the blue.

I don't think it's obvious at all. I challenged her yesterday to give examples and she couldn't. She's basically got a chip on her shoulder and accuses him of fantasies and spin. Is that a good reason to get so personal and vicious? She couldn't actually come up with an example of anything he said that was a fantasy when I challenged her. Can you come up with something he said that was a fantasy @acceptance? I think she's full of the very shit she accuses him of.

She is doing it because she's like a fucking cat playing with a bird. This particular predator doesn't do it for food for her it's just for her personal amusement. I think it's despicable.

 

[Dan Gleesak]

I don't think it's obvious at all. I challenged her yesterday to give examples and she couldn't. She's basically got a chip on her shoulder and accuses him of fantasies. Is that a good reason to get so personal and vicious?

And she did kind of come out of the blue too. She would just pop in this thread a couple times a day, or when she was admittedly drinking, leave some passive aggressive bullshit that I shrugged off for a while.

Then she decided to contribute with that drone nonsense and she got all butthurt about me pointing out that it wasn’t comparable

 

[Bad Brain]

that is pretty much the definition of fodder lol. I have never once implied that I thought she insulted them. Just the opposite actually.

They weren’t fodder — she didn’t exploit or commodify them in any way. And if you’e admitting that I’m not sure what the problem is and we can chock this up as an example of the behavior in question. You could make the argument that she used the knowledge that you have a young family, that it’s personal, crossed a line, etc., but that’s a different matter.

 

[Thumbpicker]

They weren’t fodder — she didn’t exploit or commodify them in any way. And if you’e admitting that I’m not sure what the problem is and we can chock this up as an example of the behavior in question. You could make the argument that she used the knowledge that you have a young family, that it’s personal, crossed a line, etc., but that’s a different matter.

People that weaponise personal details that have been shared to turn them against people are disgusting. Isn't that sociopathic?

 

[Dan Gleesak]

They weren’t fodder — she didn’t exploit or commodify them in any way. And if you’e admitting that I’m not sure what the problem is and we can chock this up as an example of the behavior in question. You could make the argument that she used the knowledge that you have a young family, that it’s personal, crossed a line, etc., but that’s a different matter.

Of course it crossed the line. She knows that but she won’t apologize for it.
But I guess you and I have a different idea of what making something a commodity entails.

 

[paulyc]

Dang bro isn’t this convo about keeping it above belt?

I can’t use the word I so desperately WANT to use to describe her…

 

[Bad Brain]

I think you all are being ridiculous. The level of butthurt about this is surprising, hilarious and pathetic. Yes, one's manhood and one's dedication as a father are personal, sensitive topics. But A) It's the internet, and B) As far as I can tell it was a fair charge. How can one truly assess a person from interactions on the internet anyways? And even if there was a basis to make a judgement, who cares? It's not a mortal offense, it's just an opinion. And if it hurts because it hits close to home, don't get mad at the person who said it, change your behavior, or just own it and accept it. You're free to think it was in poor form. I might not have said it myself apart from being super angry, but I don't personally think it's off the chart distasteful or hurtful.

 

[Thumbpicker]

I think you all are being ridiculous. The level of butthurt about this is surprising, hilarious and pathetic. Yes, one's manhood and one's dedication as a father are personal, sensitive topics. But A) It's the internet, and B) As far as I can tell it was a fair charge. How can one truly assess a person from interactions on the internet anyways? And even if there was a basis to make a judgement, who cares? It's not a mortal offense, it's just an opinion. And if it hurts because it hits close to home, don't get mad at the person who said it, change your behavior, or just own it and accept it. You're free to think it was in poor form. I might not have said it myself apart from being super angry, but I don't personally think it's off the chart distasteful or hurtful.

So you think posting here makes you a bad father, and not worthy of being someone’s spouse and that’s close to home and the truth? Really?

 

[Bad Brain]

So you think posting here makes you a bad father, and not worthy of being someone’s spouse and that’s close to home and the truth? Really?

That's not what I said. I said it was a fair (IE reasonable) charge — not that it was necessarily true. And it wasn't simply his posting, but what she concluded about his personality based on his posting.

 

[Thumbpicker]

That's not what I said. I said it was a fair (IE reasonable) charge — not that it was necessarily true. And it wasn't simply his posting, but what she concluded about his personality based on his posting.

She should mind her mouth and her own fucking business imo.