Liberals: Dysgenic Non Compos Mentis

  • Thread starter Thread starter MistaGuitah
  • Start date Start date
How do you know he'll isn't real? You haven't qualified anything you said with facts. Everyone I've ever met who says with any degree of confidence that hell is not real was either ignorant, on drugs, or delusional. You're obviously not informed so what other deduction can I make?

For thousands of years, disperate cultures have depicted and described hell in similar ways. If hell wasn't real then God wouldn't be real, and that would mean no one would have a conscience. It is human conscience, which no kind of science has ever been able to explain, that people can live in common in society. Conscience is also a mechanism that can be misinformed and corrupted, which is why there are brutal dictators, mass-murderers, unhinged liberals, etc.

If you understood fundamental biology and physics then you'd understand that everything in the universe has an intelligent design. If every compound in existence has an inherent intelligent design then there is a designer. That is GOD. Whoever denies GOD denies science. If you understood these fundamental, common-sense principles, your questions would center on who is the real God. There is only 1 God. If there were any other gods, then there couldn't be a Creator because one 'god' would have had to create all the others. There is much more I could explain but I'm not confident that you'll be receptive to truth/science.

If you were informed enough to be at that point of questioning, and really, truly wanted to know the truth, GOD would reveal Himself to you in such a way that you would have no doubt again for the rest of your existence. However, since you're even in denial of science and clear history, the only answers you'll accept are those which have no credible scientific or historical basis.

People like you typically believe that humans have become smarter via evolution but you're wrong. In fact, numerous scientific studies have shown the opposite. For example, people who rely on spell-checkers or maps lose their ability to spell correctly or navigate. The brain schema restructured itself in a simpler way that's dependent on technology to think for him. Now you see kids writing school papers with AI so they're passing courses but getting dumber.

This idea that people weren't as smart or in-tune in ancient times is stupid. Mankind wouldn't have the technology we have today if it weren't developed since ancient times. In fact, modern scientists have yet to explain how ancient people managed to move and cut stone more precisely than most anyone can today, and they cannot explain how the ancients developed certain alloys and forging methods that included silicone-rich soil to make the molecules in steel align stronger during the forging process.

So continue on in ignorance if you want, but nobody with a brain is going to listen to you. At this point, nothing you said has been logical or educated enough to deserve respect. Say something intelligent and maybe we'll have something to discuss between us.

Keep in mind, this was a very quick explanation typed on a cellphone so I advise you to look into these things yourself and learn the basic things you should know to engage in these kinds of discussions.

By the way, you never studied the bible so why try to say anything about Christianity? It just makes you look ignorant. If you studied the Bible, you'd never say the things you say because you'd probably at least know what Christianity is. In fact, most so-called "Christians" aren't Christian at all. You really should get educated dude.

Oh so you're one of those christians who goes straight hurling insults the minute their world view is questioned. Anybody who doesn't believe exactly like you "must" be on drugs or crazy, huh? Got it. Careful, your religious doubt is showing, otherwise you'd be able to have a civilized conversation.

Let me tell you something. To paraphrase a famous comedian, "There are thousands of religions and gods made up by humans. Out of all those thousands, I just happen to believe in one less than you do, so if you think about it, you're nearly as much of an atheist as I am."

Also you're throwing out so many tired and beaten-to-death logical fallacies I don't even know where to begin.

You just assume your specific god must exist because "things exist, so an intelligence had to make them." You're using the classic watchmaker argument. It's a terrible argument. For one, it doesn't argue for your specific god, only "a" prime creator. However it also demands another question to be asked. "Who made god?" which you cannot answer. It also, by the way, vastly simplifies the notion of complexity. It assumes that anything we don't understand MUST be sufficiently complex enough to be impossible to naturally occur. In other words, it must exist because "God did it." That's called the "god of the gaps" theory because it just blindly attributes the cause of all the gaps in our knowledge to god's influence, but its logical conclusion is that as we learn more and more about the universe, god's influence will shrink until it is no longer necessary for the universe to work. BTW, speaking of that, we already know how every element in the universe was created. Every element in the universe (except for hydrogen and some helium) was created inside stars, due to the process of fission, even all the atoms in your body. The Hydrogen and and some helium in the universe were created during the big bang. But I wouldn't know anything about that because according to you I must be just some uneducated drug addict, right?

You also say "people can't have a conscious without God, meaning people couldn't be 'good' without God, and so civilization couldn't exist without God." That is one of the oldest religious apologist arguments in the book. You then claim that no science can explain that. That's nonsense. "Science" or more specifically "psychology" can easily explain this. You have empathy. I have empathy. We both inherently know that hurting others causes pain and is wrong, so we don't do it. You don't need a god for that. Pretty simple, really.

Another famous figure who didn't believe in any religion was once asked "if you don't believe in God, then why don't you rape and murder all you want?" And his answer was "Well, I DO rape and murder as much as I want, and that amount is none. I don't want to rape or murder anybody. Most people don't need the threat of infinite punishment to dissuade them from committing constant atrocities." I think anybody who needs a god constantly supervising them, other wise they would rape and murder constantly is a seriously broken psychopath of a person. Every time you look at a hot woman on the street, do you honestly think "man I would definitely rape her right now if only I wouldn't get sent to hell later." I'd be willing to bet you probably don't think that. Or maybe you're a completely fucked up and broken person who does think that, I don't know. If that's the case then I'm glad there is a made-up story out there that will stop you from hurting people.

Moving onto you bringing up evolution... It's also obvious you also have zero idea how science currently understands evolution to work. It honestly sound like your understanding of evolution is limited to what some idiot teacher at a christian school taught you in a religious apologetics class.

"Evolution" doesn't mean "things always get 'better'." First of all "better" is a subjective word. It's a human construct. Evolution doesn't always make things smarter, faster, or stronger. Evolution is broadly understood to work in the following way: "things will tend to genetically mutate or subtly change over time and if those mutations make them more successfully able to reproduce in their environment, then those traits will take over the species. If two groups become separate and they evolve in different directions to the point they can no longer reproduce with each other, then now you have two different species. If a species is in balance with its environment, then any mutations or changes will likely be maladaptive and as such the species will probably stay as it is" That's evolution.

Evolution also happens in humans on VASTLY longer timescales than what you're talking about. Modern humans have existed in roughly their current state for the last hundred to several hundred thousand years. Your talk about "people becoming less evolved because of google maps and spell check" doesn't make sense. However, individuals can adapt to their environments. Adaptability is a factor in any organism's success, and people tend to be pretty good about it. And if you ask me, if a person can recognize that they can get something else to give them directions, meaning they don't have to waste energy thinking about that, well that seems like a decent adaptation so long as the environment stays stable (meaning they don't lose access to GPS). But if they do, they'll likely adapt back to doing what they did beforehand.

As for your last comment about me never having studied the bible... welp, wrong again, like most everything else in your post. I've spend most of my life studying the bible and other religions like it. I've come to the conclusion that the christian god as most people understand it is simply impossible. I don't mean "amazing" either. I mean "the existence of the christian god is paradoxical and cannot exist." Hell just look up the Epicurean Paradox or "the problem of evil" for the simplest logical exercise regarding that.

In other words, please continue on in ignorance if you want, but nobody with a brain is going to listen to you. At this point, nothing you said has been logical or educated enough to deserve respect. Say something intelligent and maybe we'll have something to discuss between us.
 
Last edited:
God calls all men through the promise of blessings to come. It's a wedding feast brother and the people who were invited didn't show up so now the Lord has gone out into the streets and found the rejects of the world and invited them instead. So it is a binding agreement, a contract if you will, much like a jewish wedding has a contract that is signed. So it is absolutely a choice.


Why would I need or want to, instead of praise God (which btw is making MUSIC), chill out? It's heaven. It already is the eternal chill. There is no torment, no sorrow, no longing, no sighing, no misery, no missing loved ones, only complete joy and pure peace in the Lord. If you tasted it once you might be inclined to cast off all your worldliness to guarantee you experience it the greater.

People think of heaven as worldly things. A beautiful guitar, a sweet amp. A custom motorcycle. A beautiful woman. Delicious food. None of that worldly junk will matter at all there. In fact it will be forgotten. It can be unsettling to imagine letting go of worldly goods when it is seemingly all we know but if you have opened your heart to the Lord perhaps he will grace you with that blessing, to perceive the heavenly kingdom. Hope for what is eternal. If you choose only to pursue worldly things then that is likely all you will reap and it will belong to someone else when you die. The things of heaven though, are forever. I like things that cannot be stolen so no one is going to steal my faith!!!

I appreciate your sentiment, I really do. I just don't think it's real, as much as I'd like to believe it is. I wish I could allow myself to believe something just because I think it would be nice if it were real, but that's never been how my brain works.

I agree with you that most people's idea of heaven, were it to exist, doesn't make much sense though. Yeah it would be nice to be able to run around in some idealized paradise as some perfected version of yourself for a few millennia, getting to freely experience every cool thing a human could experience and all that, but even thinking about that for a little while makes you ask yourself "why would a deity bother with that?" Why would a god set up some individualized instance of heaven for every lowly human? Why bother? This question is especially fair when you consider the world as it exists today has so many unfathomably shitty things happening to people who don't deserve it. Child cancer, torture, molestation. War. Famine. Some CLEARLY selfish people are allowed to live in complete luxury and happiness while others live their entire life in poverty, fear, disease. God allows all of it to happen. Why would that god bother to give all of us some infinite paradise when he doesn't even bother to make the world we live in now anything besides the shithole it is for so many people, when he could accomplish that with mere thought?"

The way I see it, according to Christianity, the vast entirety of the universe boils down to nothing but a simple pass/fail test for humans. Why would god bother with all that? If God wanted to create a species to love, why bother with all this nonsense pain and suffering... just to test to see which ones of his creations are worth keeping around? I thought God was perfect and loved us, so why would he allow people who would go to hell or oblivion be created at all in the first place? It just doesn't make sense. And on that note, considering how unequal the quality of life is on this planet, how could this "test" possibly be fair? Some people are presumably born into a life that sends them straight into "the correct" religion while others are born, through no action of their own, into lives that would be almost impossibly incompatible with "the correct" religion.

Following that logic, if even a single person in human history goes to hell or is simply deleted from existence, that signifies that God failed, in which case he's not "perfect" because he's made a mistake, so the whole notion of a perfect god is impossible. The thing is, the Christian God already admitted to being imperfect when he flooded the world to rid it of his mistakes. So where does that leave room for the modern Christian understanding of God? Personally I don't see where any room is left at all.

To me, what makes by far the most sense is that the entire concept of religion was made up by people to explain existence to themselves. Then it was co-opted by those in power (particularly the Constentinian Empire which rocketed Christianity to popularity after Constantine converted to the religion late in life) as a means to control the population. These days it has been almost entirely taken over by charlatans and opportunists, which brings up yet another question. If the Christian God actually real and actually loved us and wanted us to succeed in this world, why does he seem to be trying his absolute hardest to hide himself and his "true" religion from the world? Why would he allow other religions to exist at all when he would know that statistically BY FAR the biggest factor determining one's religion is the religion they are born into?

Every single question I ask myself about this subject always ends in "oh, right. it doesn't make sense."
 
Last edited:
I agree with you that most people's idea of heaven, were it to exist, doesn't make much sense though. Yeah it would be nice to be able to run around in some idealized paradise as some perfected version of yourself for a few millennia, getting to freely experience every cool thing a human could experience and all that, but even thinking about that for a little while makes you ask yourself "why would a deity bother with that?" Why would a god set up some individualized instance of heaven for every lowly human?
I think you have a wrong idea of heaven. It's not for your life experience and let the good times roll. It's not 1950's America turbocharged. It's not for our glory and honor. It is for the Lord's.

This question is especially fair when you consider the world as it exists today has so many unfathomably shitty things happening to people who don't deserve it. Child cancer, torture, molestation. War. Famine. Some CLEARLY selfish people are allowed to live in complete luxury and happiness while others live their entire life in poverty, fear, disease. God allows all of it to happen.
So god is actually the one responsible for rapes and murders not the actual rapists and murderers? That is what you seem to imply with most of your post. It's really all God's fault but he doesn't actually exist so now who's fault is it? Doesn't make sense to me. People have been doing wrong stuff since Adam and Eve by their own choice. To say God made an imperfection is a cop out. More like the person made a mistake. Sin is the problem, and often the medicine of illness or hard times is the cure. Like many medicines and treatments, it might be bitter or painful, but we are healed through it if our repentance causes us to spend eternity with the Lord.

I thought God was perfect and loved us, so why would he allow people who would go to hell or oblivion be created at all in the first place?
If you were giving away free USA Jacksons and Wizard amps, not everyone would want one. It would be unlikely you would force someone to accept your gift. The point is some people choose a path that runs in opposition to Christ and do not want heaven or things of the Lord.

Following that logic, if even a single person in human history goes to hell or is simply deleted from existence, that signifies that God failed, in which case he's not "perfect" because he's made a mistake, so the whole notion of a perfect god is impossible. The thing is, the Christian God already admitted to being imperfect when he flooded the world to rid it of his mistakes. So where does that leave room for the modern Christian understanding of God? Personally I don't see where any room is left at all.
If he hadn't made any "mistakes" the next criticism would be that he omitted your free will to decide, and so is a dictatorial dirtbag. You're accusing the Lord of being the source of the problems, and want him to snap his fingers and fix it, but that would require you involuntarily giving up your autonomy. So instead the Lord calls those who are willing to give up that autonomy by their own free will and become a covenant person. The weeds and the wheat share the same field until harvest so the rain falls on the just, and the unjust alike.

If the Christian God actually real and actually loved us and wanted us to succeed in this world, why does he seem to be trying his absolute hardest to hide himself and his "true" religion from the world?
Because God Almighty is unknowable. You cannot search out his ways, nor do humans have the intellect nor depth of understanding to grasp his plans or decisions. You cannot see his face and live He is only knowable through Christ. His true church is eastern orthodoxy which is pre-denominational.
 
:ROFLMAO:

Yesterday you guys were cryin' about how no one wants to have a real disucssion..

This place is dysfunctional as hell.
Dude, you proving your statement that I am wrong IS a real conversation. Drive by posting with random clips interspersed is not. :ROFLMAO:

Furthermore, I never said this place needs more anything.
 
I think you have a wrong idea of heaven. It's not for your life experience and let the good times roll. It's not 1950's America turbocharged. It's not for our glory and honor. It is for the Lord's.


So god is actually the one responsible for rapes and murders not the actual rapists and murderers? That is what you seem to imply with most of your post. It's really all God's fault but he doesn't actually exist so now who's fault is it? Doesn't make sense to me.

Check out the Epicurean Paradox. It's also referred to as "the problem of evil."

If a god exists, and he is as powerful as christianity claims, meaning that he knows everything and can do anything, then yes he is literally to blame for every rape and murder that happens in the world, because he knows about every rape and murder and could effortlessly stop all of them, but chooses not to. And that's not to mention that if he exists and created humanity, then that means he designed human psychology and therefore the desire to rape and murder in the first place.

Let's say you are standing on the edge of a cliff. Also, let's say you have a toddler. And now let's say you saw your baby running toward the cliff edge on a trajectory that would mean the baby would run off the edge right next to you. You could almost effortlessly grab the baby and stop it from falling off the cliff if you wanted. But if you see the child running and simply choose not to stop it, then you are responsible for the baby's death when it runs off the cliff.

God, if he exists, actively chooses not to grab the baby, every single time something "evil" happens in the world. Every time a child is raped, murdered, maimed, gets cancer, or anybody else goes through those things, that is direct evidence of god being fully aware of it and making the decision to allow it to happen.

It is literally logically impossible for god to be all knowing and all powerful and not be responsible for everything.

People have been doing wrong stuff since Adam and Eve by their own choice. To say God made an imperfection is a cop out. More like the person made a mistake. Sin is the problem, and often the medicine of illness or hard times is the cure. Like many medicines and treatments, it might be bitter or painful, but we are healed through it if our repentance causes us to spend eternity with the Lord.

If God exists, then he created the concept of sin. He must have, because he created everything, including the rules of the universe. The idea that "people commit sin and have to endure hard times for it" first of all according to the bible is not true. The cure for sin, according to the bible, is simply to "accept Jesus into your heart" so punishment or suffering is not necessary. But even if it were, it would be because God made it that way. Why did God go to the trouble of creating sin and the rules surrounding it in the first place?

You mention Adam and Eve. I've always had a big problem with that creation myth. In the story God makes the conscious decision to invent the tree of knowledge and its fruit. He didn't have to create that tree, but he did. THEN he plops it down right in the middle of the Garden of Eden. Why did he do that? Why didn't he place it on the other side of the planet? Again, why did he bother making it at all? So he puts the tree smack in the middle of the garden, THEN he designs Adam and Eve's psychology and makes them curious, so he knows they'll be interested in it. THEN he tells them the fruit of the tree is mysterious and that if they ever eat it, they'll be punished, but he refuses to go into more detail. If he really loved them and wanted them to succeed, why would he craft such a perfect trap for them? AND THEN as if all that wasn't enough, God goes out of his way to create a deceptive serpent that speaks the same language as Adam and Eve, and allows it into the garden, knowing full well its intentions. And then the serpent uses Eve's own love for Adam against her and convinces her to eat the Apple, and then God allows Eve to convince Adam to eat the apple.

Then God has the audacity to act surprised and disappointed when his very deliberately crafted trap has been sprung, as if he didn't know it would happen exactly that way the entire time.

AND THEN, for some reason, God just decides that this means EVERY HUMAN from that point forward would be guilty of sin to the point of deserving an eternity of torture... before they were even born... because the first humans were fooled into eating a piece of fruit.

Because he "loves" us.

It doesn't make sense at all. God's behavior in this story is so inexcusably evil and conniving that he may as well be a Saturday morning cartoon villain.

It does not make any sense at all.


If you were giving away free USA Jacksons and Wizard amps, not everyone would want one. It would be unlikely you would force someone to accept your gift. The point is some people choose a path that runs in opposition to Christ and do not want heaven or things of the Lord.

The thing is, we're not dealing with "do you want a free thing that may or may not be your cup of tea" here. We're dealing with "do you or don't you want to go through infinite excruciating torture for eternity" here. Literally nobody would want that.

On that note, because of the possibility of torture or even oblivion, it is impossible for anyone to freely and purely choose to follow god because god has setup the system so that there is ALWAYS the threat of punishment if you don't follow him.

AT BEST you can only "comply with god's extortion" of humanity because of the rules he created.

If god gave people the choice of "be in paradise with me for eternity" or "be in another paradise for eternity without me" then THAT would actually be a valid choice, but that choice apparently doesn't exist. Personally I think that choice doesn't exist because the whole thing is just a story made and co-opted by people who want to control others, and what better way to control others than threatening them with eternal punishment.

If he hadn't made any "mistakes" the next criticism would be that he omitted your free will to decide, and so is a dictatorial dirtbag. You're accusing the Lord of being the source of the problems, and want him to snap his fingers and fix it, but that would require you involuntarily giving up your autonomy. So instead the Lord calls those who are willing to give up that autonomy by their own free will and become a covenant person. The weeds and the wheat share the same field until harvest so the rain falls on the just, and the unjust alike.

If god is all powerful and can do anything, he wouldn't even have to make the effort of "snapping his fingers" to do anything. He could just decide to fix everything in his mind and it would be fixed.

Also by that logic, the only added outcome of "free will" is the possibility of going to hell for eternity. In that context, do you think Free Will is really the gift we've all been told it is?


Because God Almighty is unknowable. You cannot search out his ways, nor do humans have the intellect nor depth of understanding to grasp his plans or decisions. You cannot see his face and live He is only knowable through Christ. His true church is eastern orthodoxy which is pre-denominational.

I've always thought this is kind of a cop out answer. Every time something good happens it's "wow God is so great and this proves he loves me" and every time something bad happens it's "oh well God is mysterious and we can't possibly know anything about him" or "well the devil or some other evil thing must have been responsible for it" especially when God could stop "the devil" or any other evil entity instantly if he wanted.

It is completely cognitively dissonant to attribute every good thing that happens to God and how his love for us is so clear and understandable, but every bad thing that happens is caused for some reason we can't possibly understand.
 
Last edited:
It is completely cognitively dissonant to attribute every good thing that happens to God and how his love for us is so clear and understandable, but every bad thing that happens is caused for some reason we can't possibly understand.
While I appreciate your honest and open and thorough post, and did read it, I chose to comment on this because for me the crux of the discussion is boiled down here. You attribute evil and negativity and suffering to God so explain how is it cognitively dissonant to attribute goodness to God but it is not when you attributed what is awful to him? That seems like a pretty serious double standard since you used the epicurean argument. If everything come from God then also goodness comes from him,and could be used to show he is not only evil and cruel, but loving and nurturing. That makes no sense either.

As for the rest of your post with it's pointed and sometimes legitimate criticism of Christianity I would say your understanding of it is highly westernized, which is not your fault but an eastern perspective might improve your general outlook. There is quite a bit less confusion of heaven, hell, and other theological things there. Best-VBF
 
If a god exists, and he is as powerful as christianity claims, meaning that he knows everything and can do anything, then yes he is literally to blame for every rape and murder that happens in the world, because he knows about every rape and murder and could effortlessly stop all of them, but chooses not to.
He isn't to blame for every bad thing someone else does, but he is to blame for not intervening when he could have, as well as creating and allowing the circumstances in which these horrors arose.
 
It doesn't make sense at all. God's behavior in this story is so inexcusably evil and conniving that he may as well be a Saturday morning cartoon villain.

It does not make any sense at all.
God ways are not your ways (Or my ways), or anyone's ways really, are they? But still, glorify him — he is so beyond us that you can't understand how great everything that appears to suck really is, or eventually will be.
 
If god gave people the choice of "be in paradise with me for eternity" or "be in another paradise for eternity without me" then THAT would actually be a valid choice, but that choice apparently doesn't exist.
Great point, never considered it that way. I mean, it's kinda like holding a gun to your head — or rather much, much worse — isn't it?
 
Great point, never considered it that way. I mean, it's kinda like holding a gun to your head — or rather much, much worse — isn't it?
I've said it before and although PLX disagrees with me, the literal translation of Hell/Shiel in the bible is hole in the ground and eternal damnation is described as eternal separation from god. So that choice does exist as long as you think just finally having some god damn peace and quiet by ceasing to exist is paradise.
 
I've said it before and although PLX disagrees with me, the literal translation of Hell/Shiel in the bible is hole in the ground and eternal damnation is described as eternal separation from god. So that choice does exist as long as you think just finally having some god damn peace and quiet by ceasing to exist is paradise.
Whatabout eternal torment, wailing and gnashing of teeth, all that jazz?
 
Whatabout eternal torment, wailing and gnashing of teeth, all that jazz?
All bullshit invented by men to control other men. Jesus’ 40 days with Satan or whatever the fuck you call it is the only place fire and brimstone and all that shit appears.
 
All bullshit invented by men to control other men. Jesus’ 40 days with Satan or whatever the fuck you call it is the only place fire and brimstone and all that shit appears.
Pretty sure it’s in the Bible, no?
 
Pretty sure it’s in the Bible, no?
What's in the bible ? Be specific. And which bible ?

Nowhere in the greek bible or the good news bible does it say hell is fire and brimstone and that's where non believers go. On judgement day believers will be resurrected to spend eternity with god. Unbelievers will not.

Ask yourself why there is a King James version.
 
I think it would be hard to make the case that god is a loving god if anyone who didn't worship him burned in hell for eternity. Sounds a little sketchy no ?
 
Revelation 20:10
English Standard Version
10 and the devil who had deceived them was thrown into the lake of fire and sulfur where the beast and the false prophet were, and they will be tormented day and night forever and ever.

Revelation 20:15
English Standard Version
15 And if anyone's name was not found written in the book of life, he was thrown into the lake of fire.
 
I think it would be hard to make the case that god is a loving god if anyone who didn't worship him burned in hell for eternity. Sounds a little sketchy no ?
Sounds like bad western theology which is probably half the reason there are several guys in here actively bashing christianity and the bible. The non orthodox are not judged by the same standard as orthodox people. Many who make the sign of the cross will not make the cut.
 
Revelation 20:10
English Standard Version
10 and the devil who had deceived them was thrown into the lake of fire and sulfur where the beast and the false prophet were, and they will be tormented day and night forever and ever.

Revelation 20:15
English Standard Version
15 And if anyone's name was not found written in the book of life, he was thrown into the lake of fire.
First of all that is Revelations, which is clearly not a book that is meant to be taken literally. There are more interpretations of that book than any other in the bible. And if even one of those interpretations was accurate the earth would be a smoking hole right now.
And the first paragraph doesn't say anything about all non believers.
 
Back
Top