I don’t think that’s really true. I’m not a biologist but I’m pretty sure that humans only come in one or the other, even though there can be genetic deformities. It’s like saying if you’re born without hands you’re not totally a human.
I reckon a biologist would say the same thing as what I just said. I am talking about biological differences and syndromes - not psychological delusions.
Turner and Klinefelter syndromes for example, occurs in girls and boys, respectively. In other words, they have these abnormalities, but it doesn’t mean they are not one or another gender, biologically speaking.
. I'm not trying to convince anyone of anything other than that society has gone mad to the point of reaching out to the furthest level of mental gymnastics in an attempt to try and justify something that is counter to reality. Though, don't let my view disrupt yours. It's not good for constitution. I don't care if every skill or attribute were otherwise comparable between two people of different natures, because in the end they aren't the same thing.
I don’t think this is a question of mental gymnastics. I think you’re over simplifying a complicated matter. But I also think that the IOC is probably being politically biased and would have made a different call in the past.
So what are they then? You’re not gonna go Facebook 50+ genders now are you? ?
This is not a question of gender which I think is modern make believe. This is a question of biological sex. All this gender rubbish that people carry on about is absolute rubbish. The most obvious example of how you can be both/neither sex is a hermaphrodite... but once again this is very rare. This has nothing to do with what lefties carry on about with their "gender" rubbish. All those normal people that say I am a man in a woman's body and vice versa is absolute bs.
You're not totally a human. Totally = entirely. You're still a human. Technically you're not total. See how annoying that is?
Do they happen to have any particular advantages or disadvantages to those without the disorders?
I think you're overly complicating a simple matter. ?
Mutants.
I hope you’re joking. Is a person with Down’s syndrome a mutant?
Exactly.
Yes.
Just refute them then. You haven’t. You’re just saying that a woman = XX, boobs and a vagina and if you don’t have one of those then you’re not a woman. What you are we don’t know but just not a woman, even though our species is comprised of two sexes and there is no non-sex option.
Classy ?
Sorry, but it's true. Language. Like the thread title. It's not a slight. Just a reality.
I have, and you just did it again for me. I never said "We don't know," In fact I said that they should be in their own leagues. Did you take that as a "we don't know?" or as "classify people by what they are?" because the latter entails exactly that. Thanks for playing.
