Ay-ay-ay. Talk about going in circles. Let's just recap for those watching. This debate concerns A) whether "intersex" people (As defined in the excerpt you linked) should be allowed to compete in the Olympics and B), whether "mutant" is the accurate classification of biological sex for those more commonly understood to be intersex.
Regarding A), you argued that "mutants" should be barred from competing in the Olympics. You never justified this position or clarified what degree or type of mutation would preclude one from competing. Given that mutations may not produce detectable changes in the phenotype of an organism (The so-called mutant), and that chromosomal mutations such as Turner and Klinefelter syndromes affect females and males respectively, one gets the sense that your view is instead rooted in personal disgust about the intersex condition rather than the question of fairness to other athletes.
That brings us to B). While perhaps technically accurate, "mutant" is generally a pejorative term. But more importantly you still haven't defended it's application as a classification for biological sex. "Mutant" would also include conditions such as Down syndrome or Sickle cell anemia, neither of which relate to biological sex. It seems that instead of providing accessible references, you'd prefer to write walls of text babbling about nothing, feigning exasperation and intellectual superiority, and then throw in the occasional "neuroscience 2nd edition", which as it turns out doesn't even support what you're arguing.
So what now, more cat pics?
Holy, you can't make this stuff up. What a fucking joke.
