Are our rights under attack?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Dan Gleesak
  • Start date Start date
Poor Anusrar
Your circular logic appears to have you chasing your tail..
You will have worn a circle in your floor before this thread is done.
Just seems… odd
You seem to have taken on Donnie’s mantle of posting 5 pages of nothing and spending yourself in a game of some kind where you are the only one playing..
And you appear to be losing to yourself.
The complexity of it all escapes me, it seems simple enough, yet you keep chasing that tail. And wearing that pattern in your floor.
And chasing that tail..

And wearing that pattern in your floor…

I would suggest taking your shoes off and just wearing socks, a circular pattern in your floor could cause you to stumble if you go wandering through there at night when your half asleep and have to pee badly.
And then, there you are on the floor, covered in pee.
Don’t get covered in pee Anusrar
Carry on

What circular logic would that be? I would love, just once, for one of you guys to give me an example of these things you say I’m doing. It should be pretty easy don’t ya think?
 
Pelosi’s nephew is planning to increase the fee for background checks in Kalifornia by 500%.

THAT is what attacking people’s rights looks like.
 
Last edited:
??
Dude it’s the weekend and I actually have a life. Yes, it would be very easy to copy 5 pages of nothing you posted, but why would I waste time on that?
See it as you will ?

lol yea ok.
Maybe try like one example
 
lol yea ok.
Maybe try like one example
Again… 5 pages of you going in circles, which Floyd perfectly lays out in the first half of post 18. You do this all the time. It’s not up to me to prove it to you, everybody here seems to know it but you.
Now sometimes it can be entertaining, but not enough for me to spend a bunch of time on in a weekend where I have a quarter mile of fencing to get up.
And believe me, I hate putting up fencing, I’d rather be beat with a baseball bat ?
 
Again… 5 pages of you going in circles, which Floyd perfectly lays out in the first half of post 18. You do this all the time. It’s not up to me to prove it to you, everybody here seems to know it but you.
Now sometimes it can be entertaining, but not enough for me to spend a bunch of time on in a weekend where I have a quarter mile of fencing to get up.
And believe me, I hate putting up fencing, I’d rather be beat with a baseball bat ?

It takes 5 seconds to post an example. You could have posted several in the time it took you to type your post
 
Again… 5 pages of you going in circles, which Floyd perfectly lays out in the first half of post 18. You do this all the time. It’s not up to me to prove it to you, everybody here seems to know it but you.
Now sometimes it can be entertaining, but not enough for me to spend a bunch of time on in a weekend where I have a quarter mile of fencing to get up.
And believe me, I hate putting up fencing, I’d rather be beat with a baseball bat ?
I’m at work right now. 12 hours today. And I’d rather be doing that than fencing. I did about 170’ of 6’ privacy fence around my houses this year. 48” deep post holes with 3.5 bags of concrete every 8’. And those fence panels aren’t light. Lining them up on the string level and screwing them by myself. A lot of fucking work and I’m really glad it’s all done and I don’t have to fuck with it anymore.
 
Didn't read the whole thread but if the Secret Service bans weapons at any convention where an x-President is speaking (especially under the circumstances), then that's that. It trumps all else (no pun). It seems you were more interested in "getting people triggered/gas lighted" on a guitar forum more than anything else. I don't hate you, as you know, but you sure like to draw attention to yourself. :dunno:

I also notice how the NPR had to slip in on paragraph 2 how 'ironic' it was that this was x amount time since the Uvalde incident. Again, "guns don't kill people, people kill people". Maybe if a teacher there was packing it would have been a different outcome. Maybe if the police did their job the outcome would have been different.

Lastly, if a shop owner wants to ban guns I don't really care. I will just leave my gun in my truck just like I do if I go into a library or hospital or rock concert. I mean, am I going to skip the Red Hot Chili Peppers because the venue doesn't allow firearms? No.

@Floyd Eye a great meat counter trumps my 2A :D
 
Didn't read the whole thread but if the Secret Service bans weapons at any convention where an x-President is speaking (especially under the circumstances), then that's that. It trumps all else (no pun). It seems you were more interested in "getting people triggered/gas lighted" on a guitar forum more than anything else. I don't hate you, as you know, but you sure like to draw attention to yourself. :dunno:

I also notice how the NPR had to slip in on paragraph 2 how 'ironic' it was that this was x amount time since the Uvalde incident. Again, "guns don't kill people, people kill people". Maybe if a teacher there was packing it would have been a different outcome. Maybe if the police did their job the outcome would have been different.

Lastly, if a shop owner wants to ban guns I don't really care. I will just leave my gun in my truck just like I do if I go into a library or hospital or rock concert. I mean, am I going to skip the Red Hot Chili Peppers because the venue doesn't allow firearms? No.

@Floyd Eye a great meat counter trumps my 2A :D

Yea I was going to touch on the irony of the brining up uvalde, but the butthurt came on quick so I didn’t bother.

Every time I try and be part of a discussion about guns here, I hear cries of infringement. So it is very odd and interesting to me that no one seems to be bothered by this instance.
 
Yea I was going to touch on the irony of the brining up uvalde, but the butthurt came on quick so I didn’t bother.

Every time I try and be part of a discussion about guns here, I hear cries of infringement. So it is very odd and interesting to me that no one seems to be bothered by this instance.
Well when you create threads obviously for the sole reason of stirring up shit, don’t be surprised when people call you out on your faggotry, punk ass.
 
Well when you create threads obviously for the sole reason of stirring up shit, don’t be surprised when people call you out on your faggotry, punk ass.

I said pages ago that the thread was meant to be snarky. (Maybe you need that English class).
So no, I’m not surprised.
 
I said pages ago that the thread was meant to be snarky. (Maybe you need that English class).
So no, I’m not surprised.
Have you read your posts punk ass ? Your grammar skills are pedestrian. Pretty sad for someone claiming to be the smartest mother fucker in the room.
 
Every time I try and be part of a discussion about guns here, I hear cries of infringement. So it is very odd and interesting to me that no one seems to be bothered by this instance.
I get some of that. But in this case, you created the discussion. And in doing so, you made an edgy thread title and then used the words "is anyone triggered" or whatever. Guess what? Most of us are not, because the SS is trying to protect President Trump after he was almost assassinated. Of all the examples, that was not a good one. Personally, I'd just let it roll off the page and into the sunset, but that's me.



I said pages ago that the thread was meant to be snarky. (Maybe you need that English class).
So no, I’m not surprised.

Edit: PS, I didn't read that page/post yet about being snarky but it comes across as gaslighting. Maybe I'll feel different after getting to Page 2 and beyond.
 
I get some of that. But in this case, you created the discussion. And in doing so, you made an edgy thread title and then used the words "is anyone triggered" or whatever. Guess what? Most of us are not, because the SS is trying to protect President Trump after he was almost assassinated. Of all the examples, that was not a good one. Personally, I'd just let it roll off the page and into the sunset, but that's me.





Edit: PS, I didn't read that page/post yet about being snarky but it comes across as gaslighting. Maybe I'll feel different after getting to Page 2.
Except that story was about 7 years old. Like Dan’s IQ.
 
I get some of that. But in this case, you created the discussion. And in doing so, you made an edgy thread title and then used the words "is anyone triggered" or whatever. Guess what? Most of us are not, because the SS is trying to protect President Trump after he was almost assassinated. Of all the examples, that was not a good one. Personally, I'd just let it roll off the page and into the sunset, but that's me.





Edit: PS, I didn't read that page/post yet about being snarky but it comes across as gaslighting. Maybe I'll feel different after getting to Page 2 and beyond.

I think it’s a perfect example to be honest. The mantra of carrying a gun is for safety. I’ve heard time and time again that an armed public will prevent crime.
But when it comes to a scenario where a shooting is more likely than normal…the “safe” thing to do is to just ban guns.

Don’t get me wrong, I 100% agree that it is the right call.

It just goes against all the things I’ve been told in discussions when trying to learn about guns.


And also let’s be real, 95% of threads in the OTC are meant to be “edgy”. At least this one has a link to an actual event happening and not some random podcast saying that Harris is a communist ya know?
 
Back
Top