How is it possible for Biden to have undetected Prostate Cancer?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Killcrop
  • Start date Start date
Dan Gleesak said:
Because I’m not retarded
Click to expand...
I agree. You just like to argue and will argue well beyond the point when your argument is untenable. I've said it before, it's the same way my wife argues. Never admit you're wrong under any circumstance.


And no I am not calling you a bitch or equating you with women. It's just an observation, not a dig.
 
Floyd Eye said:
I agree. You just like to argue and will argue well beyond the point when your argument is untenable. I've said it before, it's the same way my wife argues. Never admit you're wrong under any circumstance.
Click to expand...

I don’t think I’ve once had a statement actually be argued here. I can’t think of a single time that I’ve shared a thought or opinion on anything, and had someone respond to it with anything actually relatable to my post. The only time I argue with people is to try and get them back on track for more than 2 posts. It’s madness lol
 
Dan Gleesak said:
I don’t think I’ve once had a statement actually be argued here. I can’t think of a single time that I’ve shared a thought or opinion on anything, and had someone respond to it with anything actually relatable to my post. The only time I argue with people is to try and get them back on track for more than 2 posts. It’s madness lol
Click to expand...
That's because you generally avoid addressing the statement and proceed into semantics or some other shit.

Like not answering the simple question how the Trump team withheld information or mislead anyone about the ear injury. Your response was a reference to wrestling.
 
Floyd Eye said:
That's because you generally avoid addressing the statement and proceed into semantics or some other shit.

Like not answering the simple question how the Trump team withheld information or mislead anyone about the ear injury. Your response was a reference to wrestling.
Click to expand...
A lot of lefties are anti-semantics ;-)
 
Floyd Eye said:
That's because you generally avoid addressing the statement and proceed into semantics or some other shit.

Like not answering the simple question how the Trump team withheld information or mislead anyone about the ear injury. Your response was a reference to wrestling.
Click to expand...

No, that was not my response to it.
Lets focus again

my response was that he “paraded around with a big douchey ear bandage” to make it appear he was injured more than he was.

I will happily directly answer any question you ask me, but it’s annoying when you feebly attempt to turn asking me random questions into a debate tactic. Fucking lame too

I argue semantics in an attempt to get you back on track. Someday it might happen!
 
Is “arguing semantics” the new “gas lighting”? A phrase you all throw around when you can’t differentiate the difference between being gaslit and just being empirically wrong g
 
Dan Gleesak said:
Is “arguing semantics” the new “gas lighting”? A phrase you all throw around when you can’t differentiate the difference between being gaslit and just being empirically wrong g
Click to expand...
Making a comparison between putting a bandage on a wound and lying about having cancer sure as fuck doesn’t equate to empirically correct. 😂😂😂
 
Floyd Eye said:
Question.

Answer
Click to expand...

I didn’t quote or answer that question. My wrestlemania response was about you and VB discussing that it was just a minor injury. That isn’t arguing semantics, I am just telling you that you are wrong
 
Floyd Eye said:
Making a comparison between putting a bandage on a wound and lying about having cancer sure as fuck doesn’t equate to empirically correct. 😂😂😂
Click to expand...

It most certainly does as I explained it. Try reading it all again
 
And no, it’s a tactic you (and my wife) use to alter the subject when your argument doesn’t make sense.
 
Floyd Eye said:
Why don't you just come out and admit you think it was faked ?

Like all those space pictures.
Click to expand...
I am doubtful about anything I see on video or in photographs so I wouldn't rule out the potential for it to have been staged. We can watch the Kennedy assassination and were told it was one shooter for years. That turned out to be a lie but I'm sure in the meantime there were people who swore up and down that's how it was.
 
Dan Gleesak said:
It most certainly does as I explained it. Try reading it all again
Click to expand...
It doesn’t though. Because it’s ridiculous. And besides indicating you have TDS, you have made a few other allusions which support the same hypothesis.
 
VonBonfire said:
I am doubtful about anything I see on video or in photographs so I wouldn't rule out the potential for it to have been staged. We can watch the Kennedy assassination and were told it was one shooter for years. That turned out to be a lie but I'm sure in the meantime there were people who swore up and down that's how it was.
Click to expand...
If trump staged it why would Biden’s FBI confirm it ?
 
If I was betting my money, would be on Dan being disappointed the guy wasn’t a better shot.
 
Floyd Eye said:
It doesn’t though. Because it’s ridiculous. And besides indicating you have TDS, you have made a few other allusions which support the same hypothesis.
Click to expand...

y’all haven’t figured out TDS yet? Lol

You don’t have to agree with my opinion but you owe it to yourself to disagree about it based on the intended premise.
 
Floyd Eye said:
If I was betting my money, would be on Dan being disappointed the guy wasn’t a better shot.
Click to expand...
100%
Then again I consider those that were actually harmed or killed during the incident.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top