D
Dyllheaven88
Well-known member
Anyone have the schematic for a hot rod 50 thanks !
Uncle Smash would you buy an original SLO100 (pre bad- or does that even matter?) in today’s world? Or do you feel like they are past their time…FusedBrain is spot on. I have an Avenger. Had a Slo also. The depth mod is superfluous unless you are playing at or under around 80 dbs. The way Soldano designed his amps, is that gain and volume both increase the low end
If you are into metal, i would pass. I had a pre bad slo and it was boring. It was left in the dust by more modern amps.Uncle Smash would you buy an original SLO100 (pre bad- or does that even matter?) in today’s world? Or do you feel like they are past their time…![]()
They say a Recto is based on a SLO but IME they are completely different.If you are into metal, i would pass. I had a pre bad slo and it was boring. It was left in the dust by more modern amps.
If you want a slo flavor, but better, go with the mesa dual rec. That thing is awesome alone, but in stereo with a wizard, mgl, or other uppermid focused amp...god status
Yes. I think they are completely different also.They say a Recto is based on a SLO but IME they are completely different.
I love Rectos but they are different from one to the other and tubes really matter.
SLOs are very different for me. Crunch is pretty Marshall like and much lower gain than a Recto can do.
For liquid leads SLO would be my choice.
High gain destruction, Mesa.
Yeah I’m really wondering how it does the brutalz… I heard recordings back in the day that made me really interested in one. Also played one of the 30 watt reissues recently but it wasn’t for me.. I was curious how the originals are because I can grab one for around $3500 at the moment.. or potential trading.. lol However I already have 2 dual rectifier multiwatts & if they struggle keeping up with that thing I will probably pass. Thank you for the input,If you are into metal, i would pass. I had a pre bad slo and it was boring. It was left in the dust by more modern amps.
If you want a slo flavor, but better, go with the mesa dual rec. That thing is awesome alone, but in stereo with a wizard, mgl, or other uppermid focused amp...god status
I am open to all opinionsI'm not Uncle Smash but hell yes I'd buy an original SLO100 again and again.
Yeah I heard this too. I think Peavey also ripped off part of Mike’s design when they were building the 5150. This is a cool video featuring fluffy talking about the rectifier / SLO history:They say a Recto is based on a SLO but IME they are completely different.
I love Rectos but they are different from one to the other and tubes really matter.
SLOs are very different for me. Crunch is pretty Marshall like and much lower gain than a Recto can do.
For liquid leads SLO would be my choice.
High gain destruction, Mesa.
I am open to all opinionsthank you for replying. What is it that you admire about Mike’s creation? Also if you don’t mind me asking what kind of music do you primarily use it for?