ICE, ICE, baby

  • Thread starter Thread starter rsm
  • Start date Start date






yea-simon.gif
 
Floyd Eye said:
I see. So immigration law says that anyone who makes it across the border gets to stay huh ? That’s your argument ? 🤣🤣🤣
Click to expand...
That's why the fuckstick won't answer my question from several pages back. Regardless of the times I reposted and asked :LOL:
 
That video of the woman screaming above about California being Mexico's land, well... did Mexico make California great? I'd love to hear her answer on how Mexico improved the state. And before anyone calls me racist, one of my grandparents was from Mexico.
 
Floyd Eye said:
Ha ha. Whatever you gotta tell yourself dumbass.

Being here illegally is cause for deportation, period.
Click to expand...
Nope.
Show me where it says that and I will gladly eat my words.
And when you do finally read the law, even the one Lisa posted, you will see it is the punishment for multiple offenses, not just for crossing illegally

I’ve been saying the same shit since page one of this shitshow and you are still too dense to get it
 
Dan Gleesak said:
Nope.
Show me where it says that and I will gladly eat my words.
And when you do finally read the law, even the one Lisa posted, you will see it is the punishment for multiple offenses, not just for crossing illegally

I’ve been saying the same shit since page one of this shitshow and you are still too dense to get it
Click to expand...
I posted a link dipshit. Near the top of this page. Prior to 2025 you would go in front of an immigration judge, then you were deported unless you were granted asylum or something. But they were still deported. They didn’t get to stay Dan. NOW, DHS is operating under a clause called Expedited Deportation. Which means no judge. Bye bye.

You have to be completely retarded to believe someone can sneak into the country illegally and as long as they’re not convicted of any other crime the US can’t deport them. Jesus Christ.
 
Floyd Eye said:
I posted a link dipshit. Near the top of this page. Prior to 2025 you would go in front of an immigration judge, then you were deported unless you were granted asylum or something. But they were still deported. They didn’t get to stay Dan. NOW, DHS is operating under a clause called Expedited Deportation. Which means no judge. Bye bye.

You have to be completely retarded to believe someone can sneak into the country illegally and as long as they’re not convicted of any other crime the US can’t deport them. Jesus Christ.
Click to expand...
Glad you are reading, but there is little to nothing definitive in what you posted, compared to what Lisa posted which was an actual article of law.
I like that you went looking though
 
Dan Gleesak said:
Glad you are reading, but there is little to nothing definitive in what you posted, compared to what Lisa posted which was an actual article of law.
I like that you went looking though
Click to expand...
I picked an explanation from an immigration law firm just for you. If you read it you know it said exactly what I said in my last post. I think it even said "Dan is a retard".
 
Nothing in what I posted earlier backs your claims, Dan. Literally not a thing.


(a) Classes of deportable aliens Any alien (including an alien crewman) in and admitted to the United States shall, upon the order of the Attorney General, be removed if the alien is within one or more of the following classes of deportable aliens:

(1)Inadmissible at time of entry or of adjustment of status or violates status
(A)Inadmissible aliens
Any alien who at the time of entry or adjustment of status was within one or more of the classes of aliens inadmissible by the law existing at such time is deportable.
(B)Present in violation of law
Any alien who is present in the United States in violation of this chapter or any other law of the United States, or whose nonimmigrant visa (or other documentation authorizing admission into the United States as a nonimmigrant) has been revoked under section 1201(i) of this title, is deportable.


For the full law on the subject of deportation.

https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/8/1227
 
Floyd Eye said:
I picked an explanation from an immigration law firm just for you. If you read it you know it said exactly what I said in my last post. I think it even said "Dan is a retard".
Click to expand...

I read it for sure. I don’t often take into consideration the bullshit that the current administration is trying to push, but it still doesn’t discount what the law says
 
NowYou'rePlayingWithPower said:
Nothing in what I posted earlier backs your claims, Dan. Literally not a thing.


(a) Classes of deportable aliens Any alien (including an alien crewman) in and admitted to the United States shall, upon the order of the Attorney General, be removed if the alien is within one or more of the following classes of deportable aliens:

(1)Inadmissible at time of entry or of adjustment of status or violates status
(A)Inadmissible aliens
Any alien who at the time of entry or adjustment of status was within one or more of the classes of aliens inadmissible by the law existing at such time is deportable.
(B)Present in violation of law
Any alien who is present in the United States in violation of this chapter or any other law of the United States, or whose nonimmigrant visa (or other documentation authorizing admission into the United States as a nonimmigrant) has been revoked under section 1201(i) of this title, is deportable.


For the full law on the subject of deportation.

https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/8/1227
Click to expand...

Different than the last thing you posted, and still does not disagree with what I have said about the law.

Keep digging though guys, I am proud of you
 
Dan Gleesak said:
Nope.
Show me where it says that and I will gladly eat my words.
And when you do finally read the law, even the one Lisa posted, you will see it is the punishment for multiple offenses, not just for crossing illegally

I’ve been saying the same shit since page one of this shitshow and you are still too dense to get it
Click to expand...
See AI overview, especially the deportation section.
Any and all of the penalties listed in the AI overview are are on the table for a person crossing the border illegally regardless of if it's the 1st or 100th offence.

The piece you keep referencing is only a small portion of a larger set of documents and doesn't tell the whole story. Both USC Title 8 and the Immigration and Nationality Act work in conjunction and outline penalties throughout it's 15 Chapters and V Titles respectively. Special note; The bulk of penalties for unauthorized entry and/or revocation of authorized status in the US are listed in many of the 95 sub-sections of Title II: Immigration section. Both documents will show that deportation is always an option for any unauthorized person in the US. And yes an "illegal immigrant" is an unauthorized person.

It's up to the one presiding over the case to determine the penalty. As many have already said illegal/unauthorized entry is cause for deportation as laid out in the documents referenced. A person doesn't automatically get to stay in the US with a slap on the wrist as you keep insisting.

Feel free to read through the entirety of the documents on your own and shut the fuck up.

Link to USC Title 8
https://uscode.house.gov/browse/prelim@title8&edition=prelim

Link to Immigration and Nationality Act
https://www.uscis.gov/laws-and-policy/legislation/immigration-and-nationality-act


AI Overview

Penalties for crossing borders illegally, particularly in the United States, can include a range of consequences, including
criminal penalties, civil penalties, and deportation.
Criminal Penalties:
  • First offense: Generally considered a misdemeanor, potentially resulting in fines, imprisonment for up to six months, or both.
  • Subsequent offenses: Penalties become more severe, potentially escalating to felony charges. This can lead to increased fines and imprisonment for up to two years.
  • Re-entry after a previous conviction:Individuals who have been previously removed (deported) and then re-enter the US illegally may face more serious penalties.
    • After conviction for three or more misdemeanors or a felony (other than an aggravated felony) Fines, up to 10 years imprisonment, or both.
    • After conviction for an aggravated felony: Fines, up to 20 years imprisonment, or both.
  • Other criminal offenses: Specific laws address situations like marriage fraud or immigration-related entrepreneurship fraud aimed at evading immigration laws, which can lead to hefty fines and imprisonment.
Civil Penalties:
  • Unlawful entry: This can result in civil penalties ranging from $50 to $250 or more for each illegal entry or attempted entry. This amount can double for repeat offenders.
  • Civil penalties are separate from and in addition to criminal penalties.
Deportation (Removal)
  • Individuals who enter the United States unlawfully will be arrested, likely detained, and processed for removal (deportation).
  • If an individual does not establish a legal basis to remain in the US, they will be promptly removed to their home country or a third country.
  • Consequences of deportation: A five-year ban on re-entry into the US and potential criminal charges for subsequent unlawful re-entry.
Other factors affecting penalties:
  • Location of arrest: Where an individual is apprehended after an illegal entry can impact the process.
  • Previous deportation orders: Whether an individual has been ordered deported in the past will affect what happens next.
  • Prior criminal convictions: Convictions for certain types of crimes can lead to significantly higher penalties for illegal re-entry.
Note: While immigration violations are primarily civil offenses, illegal entry and illegal re-entry after removal are considered federal criminal offenses.

Edit: The stupid smiley faces in the copy/paste AI overview was the RT auto format for emojis. I went back and corrected them.
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top