
Dan Gleesak
Well-known member
Everything in that post were direct quotes from Robert F Kennedy's presentation about the ACIP reorganization. As RFK is a seasoned successful attorney with some large judgements in his favor and current HHS Secretary do you really think he would open himself up for defamation lawsuits and lying about the facts revealed in his presentation? Let's see if any dfamation lawsuits are filed by BIG PHARMA. You do realize that once in the childhood vaxxxx schedule the manufacturers have no liability whatsoever for possible damages caused by their product.
So I assume you don't agree with RFK that all of these injections should be stringent tested by real uncorrupted science to see if they really are safe and effective.
As revealed by RFK many of these so called vaccines were approved and endorsed by persons on the ACIP committee that had financial conflicts of interests and according to RFK they were not tested appropriately......this is corruption through and through profiteering that is protected from LIABILITY and lawsuits from harm caused by the products.
If you were sold a car that wasn't crash tested to stringent STANDARDS and the vehicle was known to fail and kill/hurt people especially children I don't doubt that eventually the general public would stop buying that car and it would cease production and those who were harmed or killed would possibly litigate the company out of existence.
As for the number of injections doses of 69-92 I would imagine as being HHS Secretary RFK would have he facts in order to make a public statement.
View attachment 403562
View attachment 403563
I don’t believe a word out of that dude’s mouth, he’s a nut job.
I can’t imagine anyone who has had a kid the in the last decade would believe they receive 60+ vaccinations either.