It didnt work.

  • Thread starter Thread starter shar-vell Dan
  • Start date Start date
Educated guesswork, at best. NO one knows for sure at this point, even though Dan thinks he does.
 
The problem isnt whether or not the mission was a success, its that Trump just couldn’t wait to run his mouth about it until anyone knew for sure.

There is a big difference between “we bombed Iranian nuclear sites” and “we completely and utterly obliterated Iran’s nuclear program”
One is presidential, the other is just fucking stupid
 
I read the day of the bombing that there is footage of trucks driving shit out of the facility for like an entire day before the strike.
 
Well you know CNN is chomping at the bit to hammer Trump right now.

By the way, the only other outlet covering it ( Reuters ) has the same headline and is using CNN as a source. How is that journalism ?
It’s hilarious when the report starts as "sources" reported. With the source being their partner(s) in fake news.
 
It's not a stretch to think they moved the enriched uranium. Many outlets are reporting that probability.
I wonder if the large number of trucks was an indication of the amount of enriched uranium they have? I figured a couple trucks would hold enough for one weapon and they had a sizeable convoy....unless they also removed "portable" machinery?
 
AP story differs from CNN story.

The assessment contradicts U.S. President Donald Trump’s statements that Iran’s nuclear program was “completely and fully obliterated” after U.S. strikes on Saturday, according to two people familiar with the early assessment who were not authorized to address the report publicly and spoke on condition of anonymity.

According to the people, the report issued by the Defense Intelligence Agency on Monday found that although Iran’s nuclear sites sustained significant damage, at least some of Iran’s highly enriched uranium was moved prior to the strikes and survived, and Iran’s centrifuges were largely left intact.

The White House called the assessment “flat-out wrong.”


Anonymous sources ? lol
 
+1 Floyd

1. Funny (sad actually) that some people hate Trump so much, they are willing to propagate fake news - and take a leaked story from aa unconfirmed low level associate as proof. To somehow demonstrate that this didn't work at all, almost as if to take Iran's side.

2. CNN and others should be ashamed of themselves for jumping on undocumented and unconfirmed reports.

3. Steve Witkoff, Special Envoy to the Middle East, is saying (on Fox) that the Isfahan facility was completely destroyed. This is the facility in Iran that is needed at the beginning and the end of the enrichment process to actually make a formidable bomb. It is part of the 'conversion' process (processing of uranium). The other two locations were nuclear sites, one above and one below ground, and they were similarly dismantled by the bunker busters. His analysis is based on the Defense Department's detailed report along with the reports of other countries.
 
Last edited:
https://www.cnn.com/2025/06/24/politics/intel-assessment-us-strikes-iran-nuclear-sites

As dRump strokes his mushroom cap in a Billion dollar Military operation it didnt work.


derp.jpg
 
Prolific liars must lay it on heavier & thicker than than the last lies as they think no one will notice they're lying.
 
Back
Top