It didnt work.

  • Thread starter Thread starter shar-vell Dan
  • Start date Start date
1750854487648.png


We really don't need to hear about your wee-willy malfunctions, Danielle.
 
As usual, you resort to ad hominem when you can't address the actual subject at hand. Pathetic.

Why bother? Memes are sufficient.

You wouldn't recognize or accept the truth if it goes against your TDS. No point in arguing with a woke leftist Canadian, makes your opinions on the USA irrelevant.

I hope the Canadian government continues their stupidity though. Should be mildly entertaining at least.

1750854628072.png
 
Last edited:
Isn't it the case that until they get a new facility that's capable of metallisation up-and-running, they're nowhere close to being able to produce the final product?

That was my understanding. The Isfahan facility was completely destroyed. Without it, you can't further the processing. And @dcburn , I hear what you are saying but it was my understanding that these facilities are complex and have some seriously heavy and cumbersome infrastructure that is not like Legos, where you can simply take it apart, load it up in a truck, and set it up somewhere else :dunno:
 
"Stay the course" of not making a weapon? As proven by your US intelligence and all evidence...
Stay the course as in continue making a weapon.

But honestly who knows what's happening?
I'm not there and I can't even trust the weather reports on the news to be accurate let alone nukes...
 
Stay the course as in continue making a weapon.

But honestly who knows what's happening?
I'm not there and I can't even trust the weather reports on the news to be accurate let alone nukes...
So you disagree with US intelligence and all evidence, that they were not making a weapon?
 
So you disagree with US intelligence and all evidence, that they were not making a weapon?
Where was all of this "intelligence" before this? Just so happens to come out now? That doesn't sound fishy to you?
Were "intelligence" agencies purposely keeping this "intelligence" from the public until after bombs were dropped?
If so, how could you blame the prez, and not those agencies?
 
Where was all of this "intelligence" before this? Just so happens to come out now? That doesn't sound fishy to you?
Were "intelligence" agencies purposely keeping this "intelligence" from the public until after bombs were dropped?
If so, how could you blame the prez, and not those agencies?
She publicly testified this information in March, idiot.
 
Do your own research, bitch.
Why, so you can just dismiss it?
Were the photos there in March?
You seem to be an expert, but can't answer a simple question.

Is this the "circular" discussions i keep hearing about?
 
Back
Top