Trump Sacks his Employment Statistics Guy

  • Thread starter Thread starter Thumbpicker
  • Start date Start date
Geo said:
Yeah like the ones in PA that helped briben take classified docs.
Click to expand...

Maybe? Don’t really know what you are talking about.
Classified info is not really what the LOC is about though. Quite the opposite.

I’ll ask you again, do you even know what the library of congress is?
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Geo
Dan Gleesak said:
Yes especially the ones that keeps records of things. How could that possibly benefit a criminal, right?
Click to expand...
Come on Dan. Having a specific position in the government doesn't keep you from being biased or acting in a biased manner. The fact is that anyone who serves at the leisure of the president can be fired by the president. And as it turns out the current president is vain and childish enough to think that anything this person says actually matters at this point. Statisticians lie all the time, even ones that work for the government. In the end her jobs report wasn't going to make a difference either way. All it did was give the left more ammo.
 
Floyd Eye said:
You think I'm a dipshit cultist ?

For the record, presidents usually fire most or all of the leftovers from the previous administrations, though the timing of this one looks pretty bad. It is probably true though that this person is full of shit.
Click to expand...
In what sense? Do you know why she was fired? Can you possibly explain what her job has to do with the reason she was fired?

Unless you are someone who blindly follows every bit of ragebait that maga puts out there, and completely forgot the most basic fundamentals of our government, I don’t see any possible way you could not see a problem with this.
 
Floyd Eye said:
Come on Dan. Having a specific position in the government doesn't keep you from being biased or acting in a biased manner. The fact is that anyone who serves at the leisure of the president can be fired by the president. And as it turns out the current president is vain and childish enough to think that anything this person says actually matters at this point. Statisticians lie all the time, even ones that work for the government. In the end her jobs report wasn't going to make a difference either way. All it did was give the left more ammo.
Click to expand...

What do you think her job was? Seriously.
 
Does anyone here know what the library of congress does, or are you just being cunts for the sake of disagreeing with me?
 
Dan Gleesak said:
In what sense? Do you know why she was fired? Can you possibly explain what her job has to do with the reason she was fired?

Unless you are someone who blindly follows every bit of ragebait that maga puts out there, and completely forgot the most basic fundamentals of our government, I don’t see any possible way you could not see a problem with this.
Click to expand...
Let's just say I don't think it's as big a problem as the people currently hammering Trump do, although I think it was a dumb move.
 
Dan Gleesak said:
Does anyone here know what the library of congress does, or are you just being cunts for the sake of disagreeing with me?
Click to expand...
Not entirely. I mean I understand that they are a vast depository of books and data and do research and provide data for congress, but beyond that I guess I don't really know.
 
Floyd Eye said:
Let's just say I don't think it's as big a problem as the people currently hammering Trump do, although I think it was a dumb move.
Click to expand...
I’m not saying this to be a dick, but him doing this goes against the most basic principle of our government.
This isn’t “I can’t have the exact gun I want” infringement.
It puts Trump in the position to delete history
 
Dan Gleesak said:
I’m not saying this to be a dick, but him doing this goes against the most basic principle of our government.
This isn’t “I can’t have the exact gun I want” infringement.
It puts Trump in the position to delete history
Click to expand...
Well not really man. It's gonna be pretty obvious to most people it was a political move. I mean it's not as if a president or a party can send tenacles into the federal government, generate a treasonous bit of obfuscation to retain power and then erase it from history. Or can they ? :confused:
 
Dan Gleesak said:
Does anyone here know what the library of congress does, or are you just being cunts for the sake of disagreeing with me?
Click to expand...
A mistake was made, it apparently was a "coding error", and it has been rectified.
 
Dan Gleesak said:
Keeping records. Everything that is published has a copy kept there. The public can access it just the same as congress for legislative reasons and research
Click to expand...
So if she keeps records and isn't the one actually creating them, it's all kind of a nothing burger right ? The records are going to exist regardless of who is in charge of "Keeping" them I assume.

Either way, I agree with you that it was a childish and pointless thing for him to do. He should have shitcanned her straight off the bat, especially if it's true that she was skewing statistics.
 
Dan Gleesak said:
I’m not saying this to be a dick, but him doing this goes against the most basic principle of our government.
This isn’t “I can’t have the exact gun I want” infringement.
It puts Trump in the position to delete history
Click to expand...
Which part of history was deleted?
Dan Gleesak said:
I haven’t the foggiest of what that means
Click to expand...
it's all over the news
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top