...And then Cancel Culture Came for the Left

[VonBonfire]

What about others' rights not to be diseased by selfish retards?

Your first line is already packed with emotion i.e "selfish retards". The emotion of anger. I can't debate someone caught in a cycle of emotions. Debate means adhering to a standard of logic and reason, not emotion.

I don't get to cut people just because I technically have a right to swing a knife in a crowded room.

You see? More emotion. That's called "brandishing" and is a crime. You never had a right to do this so it's a horrible example.

Bottom line: You did what was socially acceptable, and remained silent, or, were an active participant when it was socially acceptable to cancel people on the right for being anti mask or vaccine. Now you are angry that it is socially acceptable to cancel people on the left. Again, you have helped create this and now the Frankenstein has come for your kind also. In the future I would suggest leaning on emotions of love and forgiveness rather than anger and fear because love and forgiveness are positive emotions, not negative ones, and they create positive outcomes, not what you are seeing today. Peace.

 

[MadAsAHatter]

Your analogies are....fucked. They pretty much read like "I know your are but what am I"

So far he's pulled out at least 50% of the logical fallacy arguments.

 

[Findthetone1]

So far he's pulled out at least 50% of the logical fallacy arguments.

Like VB said, his points and "facts" are all emotion driven.

 

[TheGreatGreen]

Your first line is already packed with emotion i.e "selfish retards". The emotion of anger. I can't debate someone caught in a cycle of emotions. Debate means adhering to a standard of logic and reason, not emotion.


You see? More emotion. That's called "brandishing" and is a crime. You never had a right to do this so it's a horrible example.

Bottom line: You did what was socially acceptable, and remained silent, or, were an active participant when it was socially acceptable to cancel people on the right for being anti mask or vaccine. Now you are angry that it is socially acceptable to cancel people on the left. Again, you have helped create this and now the Frankenstein has come for your kind also. In the future I would suggest leaning on emotions of love and forgiveness rather than anger and fear because love and forgiveness are positive emotions, not negative ones, and they create positive outcomes, not what you are seeing today. Peace.

Bro you literally do not understand the concepts of "reducing" vs "eliminating." It's impossible to debate someone like that.

 

[VonBonfire]

Bro you literally do not understand the concepts of "reducing" and "eliminating." It's impossible to debate someone like that.

I do, but I'm not interested in debating stuff from five years ago. I forgive you and others for damaging my career pursuits and making threats to my family. I'm interested in showing you how your anger and fear have created the backlash you are upset about today and suggesting in the future you find a better way to conduct yourself rather than promoting a cancel culture. Do unto others. Treat others how you wish to be treated.

 

[TheGreatGreen]

I do, but I'm not interested in debating stuff from five years ago. I forgive you and others for damaging my career pursuits and making threats to my family. I'm interested in showing you how your anger and fear have created the backlash you are upset about today and suggesting in the future you find a better way to conduct yourself rather than promoting a cancel culture. Do unto others. Treat others how you wish to be treated.

Ok first of all, I never personally "damaged your career pursuits" or anybody else's, nor did I personally make any threats to your family or anybody else's, so don't even think about trying to pin something like that on me just so you can turn around in the same breath and piously "forgive me" to make yourself seem more "righteous." Take that misplaced performative sanctimonious holier than thou victim-complex horseshit somewhere else.

You don't know me, I've never promoted cancel culture and I've never been pro-censorship. Calling out lies is not the same thing as censorship.

And your "love vs fear" advice is also ridiculous. Do you think it's better to go hug a hungry tiger as opposed to getting the hell away from it because "love is better than fear" or whatever religious-based nonsense you like coming up with? Sometimes a healthy fear of things that can hurt you is a good thing.

Also, me living by a code of "doing unto others" is EXACTLY why I wore a mask in public for a while in the first place. I didn't want to get other people sick because I wouldn't want them to get me sick. I'm sure you also thought about the meaning of the golden rule a lot while you were out in public hacking on people in the name of "MY RIGHTS" though, right?

 

[Matt300ZXT]

Except for the part where Kimmel was literally just taken off the air because of pressure from Trump. You know, the thing this thread is about. Do you even hear yourself?

Hmm that's why he was taken off? That's not what I heard. I heard he was told, by his bosses, to issue an apology and start being more truthful and he refused, and that's when they fired him. It's not political or hurt feelings, it's business.

 

[MadAsAHatter]

As for your "love vs fear" advice, do you think it's better to go hug a hungry tiger as opposed to getting the hell away from it because "love is better than fear"

What is it with you and these false analogies today?

 

[The Blazing Saddle]

What is it with you and these false analogies today?

The faggot has no where else to go. Typical beta leftist, all feelings/emotion.

 

[Findthetone1]

What is it with you and these false analogies today?

Seriously.

 

[TheGreatGreen]

The faggot has no where else to go. Typical beta leftist, all feelings/emotion.

How many posts do you have in RigTalk off-topic again, my favorite brother?

 

[TheGreatGreen]

What is it with you and these false analogies today?

Seriously? Dude is obviously trying to show how he acts out of "love" and I act out of "fear" and then he framed the two concepts as diametrically opposed, and then implied that acting with love like he does is always good and acting with fear is always bad.

Then I showed how that is dumb with an analogy.

 

[VonBonfire]

Ok first of all, I never personally "damaged your career pursuits" or anybody else's, nor did I personally make any threats to your family or anybody else's, so don't even think about trying to pin something like that on me just so you can turn around in the same breath and piously "forgive me" to make yourself seem more "righteous." Take that misplaced performative sanctimonious holier than thou victim-complex horseshit somewhere else.

You don't know me, I've never promoted cancel culture and I've never been pro-censorship. Calling out lies is not the same thing as censorship.

And your "love vs fear" advice is also ridiculous. Do you think it's better to go hug a hungry tiger as opposed to getting the hell away from it because "love is better than fear" or whatever religious-based nonsense you like coming up with? Sometimes a healthy fear of things that can hurt you is a good thing.

Also, me living by a code of "doing unto others" is EXACTLY why I wore a mask in public for a while in the first place. I didn't want to get other people sick because I wouldn't want them to get me sick. I'm sure you also thought about the meaning of the golden rule a lot while you were out in public hacking on people in the name of "MY RIGHTS" though, right?

You say all this but you've referred to anti vaxxers and anti maskers as "selfish retards" in this thread. There is nothing to debate with you. You are still using cancel culture language, while complaining about cancel culture. This is why I prefer my "religious-based nonsense", more insults and negative, emotion driven language.

 

[japetus]

I do act out of love and not fear.

 

[MadAsAHatter]

Seriously? Dude is obviously trying to show how he acts out of "love" and I act out of "fear" and then he framed the two concepts as diametrically opposed, and then implied that acting with love like he does is always good and acting with fear is always bad.

Then I showed how that is dumb with an analogy.

Yeah, you countered with some goober thing about hugging a tiger that is in no way analogous to love vs fear. Plus the handful of other false analogies you peppered in this thread that didn't make sense.

I'm not in any way trying to defend VB. I'm just saying if you want to make a point you might want to veer away from these odd analogies that don't make any sense. Maybe something using fire and water as examples instead of go hug a tiger.

 

[MadAsAHatter]

I do act out of love and not fear.

I fear love and love fear

 

[The Blazing Saddle]

How many posts do you have in RigTalk off-topic again, my favorite brother?

Shitty clips in the main forum, shitty posts in OT, it’s time for you to move on. Are you going to cry now beta?

 

[TheGreatGreen]

Shitty clips in the main forum, shitty posts in OT, it’s time for you to move on. Are you going to cry now beta?

Love you too, brother.

 

[The Blazing Saddle]

Total homo, figures.

 

[TheGreatGreen]

Yeah, you countered with some goober thing about hugging a tiger that is in no way analogous to love vs fear. Plus the handful of other false analogies you peppered in this thread that didn't make sense.

I'm not in any way trying to defend VB. I'm just saying if you want to make a point you might want to veer away from these odd analogies that don't make any sense. Maybe something using fire and water as examples instead of go hug a tiger.

I mean, if you can't understand how it's stupid to show "love" to a hungry tiger by trying to hug it vs how it's smarter to show "fear" by getting away from it, and then extrapolating from that the idea of how "always showing love and never fear" is stupid and antithetical to survival, I don't know what to tell you.