pedo prince not a prince

  • Thread starter Thread starter shar-vell Dan
  • Start date Start date
There are pics of DJT with pretty much every politician ever. And pics of Epstein with every politician ever.
DJT and Epstein were neighbors.
No paintings of DJT in a blue dress, though.
Still defending the Pedo Prez. Not going to age well for you.
 
Not defending, you're a liar.
When there's proof, there's proof.
Until then anyone is innocent until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt by a jury of their peers.
A mature adult person would already know this.
Trump pardoned a thousands of people who were convicted by a jury of peers who saw the proof. Trump didn't look into any of it, just wished them well. So now you just confirmed that even if you need proof Trump is a pedo, at least you have proof he isn't mature.
 
Trump pardoned a thousands of people who were convicted by a jury of peers who saw the proof. Trump didn't look into any of it, just wished them well. So now you just confirmed that even if you need proof Trump is a pedo, at least you have proof he isn't mature.
2 totally unrelated situations.
How do you know he “didn’t look into any of it”? Sounds like pure speculation
 
2 totally unrelated situations.
How do you know he “didn’t look into any of it”? Sounds like pure speculation
He doesn't even know who he's pardoning...

“NORAH O’DONNELL: The government at the time said that CZ had caused significant harm to U.S. national security essentially by allowing terrorist groups like Hamas to move millions of dollars around. Why did you pardon him?

DONALD TRUMP: OK, are you ready? I don’t know who he is. I know he got a four-month sentence or something like that and I heard it was a Biden witch hunt.”

NORAH O’DONNELL: How do you address the appearance of pay for play?


DONALD TRUMP: Well, here’s the thing. I know nothing about it because I’m too busy doing the other. I can only tell you that. No, I can only tell you this. Um, my sons are into it. I’m glad they are because it’s probably a great industry, crypto. I think it’s good.”

That answer pretty much leaves us with two options.

Option one: He’s lying — which would make sense, considering Zhao’s deal directly benefits his family.

Option two: He’s telling the truth, and really did sign off on a presidential pardon without knowing who it was for.
 
He doesn't even know who he's pardoning...

“NORAH O’DONNELL: The government at the time said that CZ had caused significant harm to U.S. national security essentially by allowing terrorist groups like Hamas to move millions of dollars around. Why did you pardon him?

DONALD TRUMP: OK, are you ready? I don’t know who he is. I know he got a four-month sentence or something like that and I heard it was a Biden witch hunt.”

NORAH O’DONNELL: How do you address the appearance of pay for play?


DONALD TRUMP: Well, here’s the thing. I know nothing about it because I’m too busy doing the other. I can only tell you that. No, I can only tell you this. Um, my sons are into it. I’m glad they are because it’s probably a great industry, crypto. I think it’s good.”

That answer pretty much leaves us with two options.

Option one: He’s lying — which would make sense, considering Zhao’s deal directly benefits his family.

Option two: He’s telling the truth, and really did sign off on a presidential pardon without knowing who it was for.
Your TDS will finally kill you in the end.

You're now uninteresting and pathetically desperate.

Stop being THE loser of OTC.
 
Last edited:
2 totally unrelated situations.
How do you know he “didn’t look into any of it”? Sounds like pure speculation
Aside from the 14 named people, the exact wording from the white house is "grant a full, complete and unconditional pardon to all other individuals convicted of offenses related to events that occurred at or near the United States Capitol on January 6, 2021"
 
Aside from the 14 named people, the exact wording from the white house is "grant a full, complete and unconditional pardon to all other individuals convicted of offenses related to events that occurred at or near the United States Capitol on January 6, 2021"
So what's the problem?
 
So what's the problem?
This conversation is ridiculous.

Someone said you were defending Trump.

You said you aren't, you like to have proof. Then you said that any mature person needs proof. You made this sound like a value that you hold.

So I pointed out that Trump himself threw out all the proof from the trials regarding convicted criminals, including many whom admitted guilt, when pardoning people. If you are fine saying he shouldn't care about proof, then we agree. Otherwise, I'm just confused about your contradiction here.
 
You are deflecting over and over. Can you just say whether or not tossing court outcomes and ignoring the evidence was mature or not and if it mattered to you?

If you just want to bury your head in the sand and tell me to f off, there's my answer.
Pardoning people that got caught up in a False Flag operation is nowhere near the level of severity of a crime implied with the Epstein shit.
 
You are deflecting over and over. Can you just say whether or not tossing court outcomes and ignoring the evidence was mature or not and if it mattered to you?

If you just want to bury your head in the sand and tell me to f off, there's my answer.
No idea what you are talking about at this point.
Jan 6th "insurrectionists" being pardoned doesn't bother me.
But that's not the subject of this thread, and i was not replying to you.
So you can understand the confusion
 
Back
Top