Search results

I'd go with the smaller "traditional" cab. I had the OS/standard and didn't like it. I have a quad of H75s in a Bogner cab and it sounds fantastic. I think a regular sized cab is the way to go.

That indicates you're anticipating recoil. Gotta learn to relax and just let it happen haha

Yes. But also rifles are vastly more accurate and easier to shoot consistently compared to pistols.

No worries dude :) When I first started shooting, I thought, "Wowwwww hitting a dinner plate a football field away is crazy!" Then after doing it, I was like, "Wooowwww hitting a dinner plate TWO football fields aways is crazy!" And so on. Now I'm like... "Meh, hitting a 1/4-inch dot at 300...

The general rule of thumb for long-range precision shooting is you should spend as much for the optic as you did for the gun (if not more). Guns can come and go, but optics are the real investment. Long range shooting is fun, and kind of zen. But it's gotten a bit boring for me. I mostly do...

Nice. Here's mine.

2-inch group (10 shots) at 1,000 yards (3,000 feet) is smaller than the current world record. Either way, I doubt he's had much experience. My personal standard for success at 1,000 yards is 1 MOA (10 inches). Groups tend to open up considerably at distance due to tolerance stacking. So if you...

Yes, 5-25.

I know you're being sarcastic. But for anybody else, that's not physically possible. By anybody. 2 inches at 3,000 yards (1.7 miles) would be 0.0667 MOA, which is beyond the capability of anybody in the history of firearms. A more reasonable goal at 3,000 yards would be 1 MOA (30-36 inches). And...

Where are you getting your facts? He didn't disassemble anything. He is clearly holding the rifle under a black towel. He puts it down on the edge of the roof, hangs down, grabs it, then drops to the ground, and picks it up and runs off. As far as Charlie Kirk being obscured. I call BS on that...

Judging by the way the scope was mounted to the rifle, he was no pro. But hey... he unfortunately hit his target. So it doesn't matter I guess.

Charlie Kirk really wasn't moving either. He was sitting in a chair. And had been for quite some time. I'm betting the shooter went for a chest shot and missed high. Either way, doesn't really matter. My point is I doubt there is some grand conspiracy with some "pro" who made an operator-level...

Absolutely

I haven't heard/read anything that mentions his experience. But yeah, considering his dad was law enforcement for many years, I wouldn't put it past him.

After this tragedy with Charlie Kirk, I've seen a lot of people here and elsewhere claim you have to be a "pro" operator in order to make a 200-yard shot on a torso/head/neck type of target. I think the data shows Charlie Kirk was hit with a shot from around ~140 yards. I hope I'm not being...

There was no "trans" messaging enscribed/written on the shell casings. It was "anti-fascist" and gamer references.

No shoulder strap. What you're seeing is a small chain necklace. The skin colored "strap" is just skin.

It's actually "naught". As in zero. But over time because "aught".

I have a Marlin 1895 chambered in .45-70 Gov. That thing kicks harder than anything I've ever shot before, including a Beretta .50-cal.

I suppose this is the rifle, being concealed by a jacket or shirt or towel.