M
milkchickenbomb
New member
If you had a choice between these two heads for about the same money, what would you get and why?
messenger":2n1p9bko said:LOTS of love for Budda on thegearpage.com
milkchickenbomb":3p0trat3 said:messenger":3p0trat3 said:LOTS of love for Budda on thegearpage.com
To me, that's almost another endorsement for the Marshall![]()
![]()
Yeah, a boost is needed for higher gain tones but not many amps out there that sound better than an 800 with a boost IMO.milkchickenbomb":3lnywy5c said:Thank you for the replies.
I do have a weakness for the Marshall sound; many of my favorite tones have been JCM 800 tones. But the gain on tap is a bit less than what I'd like to have available. And I'm not thrilled at the prospect of a single channel amp with no effects loop. I may pony up for a Power station in the future, so the effects loop may be a non-issue.
The SD45 in question is pre-Peavey with a tube rectifier. Any love for this amp?
+1...Metro loops are very good, not that expensive and any decent tech can install.LP Freak":1eadu24h said:I'm a big Marshall fan and owned/gigged a SD45 for a while. The SD is a great amp and more versatile than the 2204 and even though it has a Marshall flavor it's not a Marshall. If you're thinking about the PS with the Marshall, you're better off installing a Metro loop and skip the PS.
They're not all created equalmilkchickenbomb":16t8c4pa said:Thanks for all of your opinions. I checked out the 2204 and wasn't impressed. Still looking....