
glassjaw7
Well-known member
Right, makes perfect sense.
tjon":2b9mpnrv said:The cement tele with the filtertron, and its not even a real filtertron.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=pl ... ExTw8KxRtg
blackba":hqwti2sv said:mboogman":hqwti2sv said:The devil is in the details. He said he tested the guitars plucking one string. The different harmonic content of different wood types would come from one type of wood accentuating certain resonating frequencies in a group of notes, versus another type wood potentially dampening those same frequencies. To me it's a very narrow, flawed experiment.
Not to mention only 7 guitars used, pretty small sample size and we have no idea what they were or what pickups are in them.
Anyone who has played guitar for a while will recognize that there is variation in tone just from the same model of guitar in a given year. And also I hear plenty of differences just between my MIM strat made of poplar compared to my 2 Alder MIA strats.
I hope the person doing the study isn't going to try to ban the use of wood in guitars after his flawed research study....![]()
I remember when the early Prestige guitars were like 1700-2000 dollars. I owned a very early (maybe first year) RG3120. I was young... traded two guitars; a Green Dot universe and a S540danyeo":861n6d65 said:Well I did have a $400 Ibanez that sounded better than a $2400 Suhr.![]()
IceMan":2tkvgxmo said:I guess we'll have to agree to disagree a bit on this. And don't get me wrong - I believe we need to be good stewards of our resources and work to replenish what we can, but I'm 40yrs old and all I've been hearing since I was a kid in school was how the rainforests and pine forests in the U.S. were about to be wiped out and only had a few years before the massive deforestation would wreak havoc on the world and it just isn't so. I remember even being taught in school how the forests in Northern MN would be all but gone by the year 2000. (lol....everything was "by the year 2000" in those days). Guess what.....they are still there and not even close to disappearing. While I'm sure we can find some spots on the globe where it's been a problem.....it's just not the issue that it's claimed to be.
crankyrayhanky":84zc6qg0 said:IceMan":84zc6qg0 said:I guess we'll have to agree to disagree a bit on this. And don't get me wrong - I believe we need to be good stewards of our resources and work to replenish what we can, but I'm 40yrs old and all I've been hearing since I was a kid in school was how the rainforests and pine forests in the U.S. were about to be wiped out and only had a few years before the massive deforestation would wreak havoc on the world and it just isn't so. I remember even being taught in school how the forests in Northern MN would be all but gone by the year 2000. (lol....everything was "by the year 2000" in those days). Guess what.....they are still there and not even close to disappearing. While I'm sure we can find some spots on the globe where it's been a problem.....it's just not the issue that it's claimed to be.
I super Love guitars, but are you angry that we're not chopping down trees fast enough? Logic being that you were told exaggerated facts by a 3rd grade teacher so it all must be invalid![]()
That being said, I GAS for an exotic warmouth neck on my MIM strat...somebody said necks are the majority of the tone, so maybe that will push me over the edge
IceMan":3lquf5ha said:crankyrayhanky":3lquf5ha said:IceMan":3lquf5ha said:I guess we'll have to agree to disagree a bit on this. And don't get me wrong - I believe we need to be good stewards of our resources and work to replenish what we can, but I'm 40yrs old and all I've been hearing since I was a kid in school was how the rainforests and pine forests in the U.S. were about to be wiped out and only had a few years before the massive deforestation would wreak havoc on the world and it just isn't so. I remember even being taught in school how the forests in Northern MN would be all but gone by the year 2000. (lol....everything was "by the year 2000" in those days). Guess what.....they are still there and not even close to disappearing. While I'm sure we can find some spots on the globe where it's been a problem.....it's just not the issue that it's claimed to be.
I super Love guitars, but are you angry that we're not chopping down trees fast enough? Logic being that you were told exaggerated facts by a 3rd grade teacher so it all must be invalid![]()
That being said, I GAS for an exotic warmouth neck on my MIM strat...somebody said necks are the majority of the tone, so maybe that will push me over the edge
Where do I infer that I'm angry that we're not cutting down trees fast enough??? I'm just pointing out that there are people who don't want wood to be used for things like guitars and that should concern all if us guitar players. Know what? There are people out there who don't want us to eat meat too - but I'll be damnd if they're going to stop me from getting my steak/burger when I want one. Point being - sooner or later - people who don't agree with something are going to work to take it away from you and will do anything to do it - even lie or exaggerate.
IceMan":2oox9y9k said:I know of few businesses who's goal it is to eliminate the product they are in business to produce. They have a vested interest to make sure we always have trees.
You must be tone deaf.danyeo":3tkkl9rl said:Well I did have a $400 Ibanez that sounded better than a $2400 Suhr.![]()
EXACTLY.Rash":3gmr1u9g said:I would not say irrelevant, I swapped strat necks with bodies 4 times, the neck is around 65-80 percentof the sound, the neck dominates the body....
A thin poly finish vs nitro does not make a relevant difference, tried it on a warmoth body.
Mostly custom shop strats are better, probably they select the necks by knocking the wood, they also feature other trems, also important the trem and saddles look for steel, my favorite: callaham with raw vintage saddles and 5 springs.
Kai
IceMan":17sz56wi said:I think you guys are missing the true point of the article. If you read the last line, the author says "I think we should be using something more rigid than wood - like carbon fiber - to build guitars". Believe it or not, there is a growing and concerted effort by many radical environmentalists to end the use of wood for things like guitars. Cutting down a tree is the ultimate sin for these folks. It started with limiting access to the more rare tonewoods, but is spreading to even plentiful woods like ash, alder, and basswood. We all know, as guitar players, that there can be magic is certain woods that creates instant tonal bliss when we here it. But if they can get some crackpot "scientists" to convince us that our ears aren't hearing anything special and it's all in our heads, then we won't get upset when Gibson has to start using MDF or carbon fiber to make their guitars. It's the classic "get an expert to tell them that reality is not reality so we can push our agenda". Just look at what the government has already done to companies like Gibson in restricting their access to certain woods. It's happening in the amp/effects realm as well with limits on materials used in electronic componants. The crazies won't be happy until we are all playing air guitar again............but...wait...won't that add to global warming??