
stratotone
Active member
Finally got an Anderson. 2006 drop top classic, deep bora bora, 2 humbuckers, floyd rose, Love it. plays great, is amazingly articulate even with high gain, stays in tune great, looks awesome.
BUT....
and I just don't understand on a guitar that's this nice, with the fretwork and attention to detail, how they could fit a floyd nut on it that doesn't go to the edges of the fingerboard (there's about 1/16" inch on either side) and the back of the nut has an 'overhang' where there is no wood - about 1/4 - 1/3rd of the nut just hangs over a shelf. Also, the floyd nut is attached by drilling two big holes in the back of the neck. This is where I saw several 80s guitars crack the headstock if they took a fall just right...
Compare this to my USA Charvels (recent) - I have three, paid $100 more for all three together than I did the one used Anderson. Anderson is a better guitar - plays better, just feels better, sounds better. But the freakin' floyd nut on the charvel FITS! There is no 'shelf' under the nut, it attaches with screws on the top of the floyd so you don't remove as much wood from the neck.
Is this a typical thing for the Anderson floyd nuts? It's a 2006, so it's not like an old one or something, and it's stock - not a retrofitted floyd or anything. It's a great guitar, I'm going to enjoy owning it - but it just seems weird they would get everything right and then miss this.
Pete
NOTE - velcro fly mentioned on the gear page that this is because of string spacing, which I can understand a bit... but to use the old style floyd nut mount with the holes through the neck and leaving a big space under the nut's back edge when they make a special joint to fit the neck to the body that increases surface area... just seems really goofy to me.
BUT....
and I just don't understand on a guitar that's this nice, with the fretwork and attention to detail, how they could fit a floyd nut on it that doesn't go to the edges of the fingerboard (there's about 1/16" inch on either side) and the back of the nut has an 'overhang' where there is no wood - about 1/4 - 1/3rd of the nut just hangs over a shelf. Also, the floyd nut is attached by drilling two big holes in the back of the neck. This is where I saw several 80s guitars crack the headstock if they took a fall just right...
Compare this to my USA Charvels (recent) - I have three, paid $100 more for all three together than I did the one used Anderson. Anderson is a better guitar - plays better, just feels better, sounds better. But the freakin' floyd nut on the charvel FITS! There is no 'shelf' under the nut, it attaches with screws on the top of the floyd so you don't remove as much wood from the neck.
Is this a typical thing for the Anderson floyd nuts? It's a 2006, so it's not like an old one or something, and it's stock - not a retrofitted floyd or anything. It's a great guitar, I'm going to enjoy owning it - but it just seems weird they would get everything right and then miss this.
Pete
NOTE - velcro fly mentioned on the gear page that this is because of string spacing, which I can understand a bit... but to use the old style floyd nut mount with the holes through the neck and leaving a big space under the nut's back edge when they make a special joint to fit the neck to the body that increases surface area... just seems really goofy to me.