
nakedzen
Member
I'm running all =C= 6550's in it now, but lately I've been starting to miss a bit more "lofi" type of tone. A bit more glue and goo to the tone, you know? So, EL34's, 6L6's, KT66's? I do like the punch the 6550's give though.
shadowdevourer":2k3dggvm said:I thought 6550s were not recommended?
shadowdevourer":2muo1h5h said:I thought 6550s were not recommended?
You're in similar company PaulyPaulyPanacea":zglb13lz said:I guess that's me![]()
Kinda like a forced sag.steve_k":33x2qrbr said:Without stepping on anybody's toes here, the easiest way to alter the response of a Diezel amp (which are fairly hi-fi anyway) is to leave those stock tubes in there as it came from HQ and play with the bias. The VH4 for instance - my favorite tone from the amp is with the BSTR's and cool the bias down to about 60% as opposed to running it 70-80%. The change in response from the amp is very noticeable. I suppose this is why 6550's never do anything for me, in any amp. Depends on your playing style and what you need the amp to do for you.
steve_k":2bchgfey said:Without stepping on anybody's toes here, the easiest way to alter the response of a Diezel amp (which are fairly hi-fi anyway) is to leave those stock tubes in there as it came from HQ and play with the bias. The VH4 for instance - my favorite tone from the amp is with the BSTR's and cool the bias down to about 60% as opposed to running it 70-80%. The change in response from the amp is very noticeable. I suppose this is why 6550's never do anything for me, in any amp. Depends on your playing style and what you need the amp to do for you.
Peter Diezel":2bchgfey said:shadowdevourer":2bchgfey said:I thought 6550s were not recommended?
Some bad boys here![]()
nakedzen":1kq79dlw said:I'm running all =C= 6550's in it now, but lately I've been starting to miss a bit more "lofi" type of tone. A bit more glue and goo to the tone, you know? So, EL34's, 6L6's, KT66's? I do like the punch the 6550's give though.
Kev":3h8ijjn7 said:nakedzen":3h8ijjn7 said:I'm running all =C= 6550's in it now, but lately I've been starting to miss a bit more "lofi" type of tone. A bit more glue and goo to the tone, you know? So, EL34's, 6L6's, KT66's? I do like the punch the 6550's give though.
To my ears and taste the tube that comes closest to a "lofi"-tone (lets rather say "not-so-hifi"-tone) is the EL34, then KT77s, then 6L6s, then not sounding "lofi" at all the 6550s. I haven't tried KT88s or KT66s. The only tube I did not like in a Diezel was the 6550.
Diezel are currently recommending KT77s due to their reliability and if you want to make Peter happy, then use those![]()
Kev":1asd6fmb said:Diezel are currently recommending KT77s due to their reliability and if you want to make Peter happy, then use those![]()
nakedzen":1qsas3yh said:Kev":1qsas3yh said:Diezel are currently recommending KT77s due to their reliability and if you want to make Peter happy, then use those![]()
Which brand? I had some bad JJ KT77's in the past, lasted only 7 months before complete failure, with moderate use and moderate bias. (The SED 6550's in both my amps have lasted over 3 years with no issues).
In any case, I went with what I'm familiar with, ie. Chinese EL34B's.
Kev":3s76y1b5 said:Also the quality of the tube-brands are constantly changing. (Maybe the JJ KT77s work better now with a Diezel, then in the past)