Wow, that's nice. I bet you couldn't wait to get that beauty in the house. That sucks about the signature...I'm sure you were disappointed, but it's still a blueface!
Wow, that's nice. I bet you couldn't wait to get that beauty in the house. That sucks about the signature...I'm sure you were disappointed, but it's still a blueface!
Any different than a pre 2011 VH4 if you happen to have compared? I know that Peter had made some minor changes, just curious how much these changes really affect the sound and if it's worth buying a new one vs. a NOS or used VH4. Thanks
Any different than a pre 2011 VH4 if you happen to have compared? I know that Peter had made some minor changes, just curious how much these changes really affect the sound and if it's worth buying a new one vs. a NOS or used VH4. Thanks
I have had VH4 (2005), Herbert (2007) but this is absolutely best for my taste. Not major changes compared to 2005 model but I think this one is little clearer and has a bit more gain and less compression...
I'm going to have to respectfully disagree with you guys. I own a 2008 and a 2011 blueface and the difference is actually very noticeable. I didn't like the blueface as much until I understood it. Now I much prefer it. The amount of compression really changes how the amp responds to your playing. The blueface also has quite a bit more cut in it's tone. I have a/b them countless times with several guitarists and they always pick the blueface. The clean is more "chimey" and over all the amp is less compressed and more open. I also have an email from Peter describing the changes and it backs up what my ears tell me.