
romanianreaper
Well-known member
I was curious how these things sound and how you like them for covering everything from clean to modern stuff?
troublehead":49k77l1w said:One of my favorite amps. I had the 100/CL and wish I still had it.
Very versatile from clean to mean. What impressed me the most was how good it sounded with my strat. The gain is very tight and clear sounding. Maybe a tad thin for really modern stuff, but for everything else it was fantastic. Mine didn't have the graphic EQ so I'm sure you could thicken it up with that option.
SgtThump":ynkcb4fq said:romanianreaper":ynkcb4fq said:Thanks bro! You know I have the JVM410 Combo and I noticed you have one of the JVM amps. Did you like it better than the JVM or is it a completely different beast altogether?
I had two different 50CL heads and a JVM410 head. They are pretty different. In the higher gain modes, the JVM was more saturated, compressed, and "thinner" in the lows. The VHT had a less saturated, open, "thicker" gain tone. Still plenty of distortion in the VHT, though.
IN MY OPINION, the VHT 50CL has two distortion channels that can be cleaned up. Not a dedicated clean channel.
SgtThump":3rd1a40i said:romanianreaper":3rd1a40i said:Thanks man! You've really helped me out with the VHT questions.
My dream amp is a Cameron modded Marshall but I'm trying to find something that will quench my thirst because I'm probably not going to find a Cameron anytime soon, especially at a good price.
I don't expect everyone to agree with this, but I think the JVM is more Cameron-like than the VHT 50CL. Both the Cameron 1959SLP "Aldrich" modded head and the JVM had a little too much distortion for me in the higher gain modes. They also weren't super thick in the lows. Now that's not a bad thing at all, but I've started using less distortion and thicker tones lately. Ya know?
Chris