Astrobotics moon mission not going great

  • Thread starter Thread starter Dan Gleesak
  • Start date Start date
yea tell me about it. we can't go anywhere without being inundated with the latest space news! just another cog in the machine man!
fucking moron lol
I don't think you're a moron. I think you are biased, naive and credulous. Honestly though I don't fault you for having believed it, but if you are objective I'd think you would question it a bit more at this point.
 
Never used it :dunno:

I buy coffee in bags. Whole bean
Yeah, I make coffee at home too.

I have no idea what a person means when you ask to pay them for a job, and they come back with, "Just buy me a cup of coffee."

?‍♂️
 
lol it has been questioned to death, and been proven accurate time and time again, for decades. Time to move on dude.
You haven't provided proof though. You just keep saying it. In debate this is known as a bald assertion. ?‍♂️
 
You haven't provided proof though. You just keep saying it. In debate this is known as a bald assertion. ?‍♂️
Did you watch the video about how the photos can’t be faked?

It’s not up to me to prove proof, or some dude on YouTube. It’s already been proved
 
Did you watch the video about how the photos can’t be faked?

It’s not up to me to prove proof, or some dude on YouTube. It’s already been proved
I started watching it and stopped when he said it was impossible to recreate the lighting in the photos and thus they are real. You both seem to have issues with logic, if not imagination.
 
I started watching it and stopped when he said it was impossible to recreate the lighting in the photos thus they are real. You both seem to have issues with logic, if not imagination.

Lol it’s not our fault your logic ignores the laws of physics.
He even demonstrated it
 
Lol it’s not our fault your logic ignores the laws of physics.
He even demonstrated it
Photoshop and it's analog equivalents aren't required to obey the laws of physics, but if you're saying his analysis is more sophisticated than that I'll take another look.
 
Did you watch the doc that Arch posted? PS Can you repost, I can't remember the link/name
 
Photoshop and it's analog equivalents aren't required to obey the laws of physics, but if you're saying his analysis is more sophisticated than that I'll take another look.
it's not sophisticated. it's explaining it in simple terms with examples, like you are a 4 year old. it's perfect for you.
 
Did you watch the doc that Arch posted? PS Can you repost, I can't remember the link/name
Fuck. :ROFLMAO: No one watches the documentaries I post.

They just blather on all day about it.. asking questions.

I give you the answers - everyone ignores it and just keeps on saying dumb shit.
 
Fuck. :ROFLMAO: No one watches the documentaries I post.

They just blather on all day about it.. asking questions.

I give you the answers - everyone ignores it and just keeps on saying dumb shit.
i don't click links
 
Fuck. :ROFLMAO: No one watches the documentaries I post.

They just blather on all day about it.. asking questions.

I give you the answers - everyone ignores it and just keeps on saying dumb shit.
I watched the Freemason one and am going to try munck again.

,,,, earlier in this thread—the moon one
 
Get ready for what?
6xxcz7c.jpg
 

Similar threads

Y
Replies
14
Views
1K
JackTheBear
JackTheBear
Back
Top