Atomic CLR

  • Thread starter Thread starter hippietim
  • Start date Start date
H

hippietim

Member
I just got one of these a couple weeks ago and have really enjoyed it. I'm gigging with a tube rig these days so I have not taken it out to use live with the Axe-FX. But my experimentation so far has been very positive.

And since the CLR is a full range rig you can do a lot more with it. I've been using it with an Avalon U5 to for bass and acoustic guitar and it sounds really good (of course the Avalon does not suck at all). The CLR handles lows and highs really well - plenty of oomph and the highs don't fatigue your ears like a lot of full range speakers out there. I'm sure it could handle keys and other stuff no problem.

I also picked up that new Zoom multi-FX pedal with Bluetooth and the CLR really got that sounding pretty good. The Zoom is no Axe-FX but it is a kick ass effects pedal and would make a great backup rig or simple grab 'n go rig as well.
 
rupe":db2n6qzq said:
Very cool Tim...how's it compare to the Verve 12ma?

I've not done a comparison yet. The 12ma's are in a storage unit - we use them as monitors live now. The 12ma served me well for almost 3 years though. I can say with a lot of confidence that the CLR sounds better - particularly in the mids - the 12ma is "honky" by comparison. I do have an RCF here that I plan on comparing.
 
RCF would be a great comparo... I'm in line for the CLRs myself. Never been down the FRFR road before. Was perfect timing with my decision and the release of the Atomic CLRs. Hopefully getting a call this week from Tom & Co.

I've heard great things \:D/
 
Tom King is an awesome guy who puts out fantastic products. I can't wait to try a pair of these and I will most definitely post a review of the CLR's when I get to check them out. :rock: :rock: :rock:
 
Sorry to disturb the party. But are you guys sure it is coaxial, strongly and well enough constructed, has the right Class poweramp and is worth this amount of money? Hype works I guess.
Concerning TK and JM I have very different "adventures". But then again if it works for you...be happy.
 
DADA":2xehiqqh said:
Sorry to disturb the party. But are you guys sure it is coaxial, strongly and well enough constructed, has the right Class poweramp and is worth this amount of money? Hype works I guess.
Concerning TK and JM I have very different "adventures". But then again if it works for you...be happy.

I have no idea what your issue is but the CLR seems to be very well built and sounds great.

It's supposed to be coaxial - I haven't looked hard to confirm though. Because I don't care. It could be a box full of 6x9 Jensen car stereo speakers powered by a Craig 8-track deck and I'd be ok with it as long it sounds good.
 
DADA":xqxmvcad said:
Sorry to disturb the party. But are you guys sure it is coaxial, strongly and well enough constructed, has the right Class poweramp and is worth this amount of money? Hype works I guess.
Concerning TK and JM I have very different "adventures". But then again if it works for you...be happy.

I know Tom personally and he has always treated me Like Gold and in my humble opinion Tom would not put out something that he did not believe in. I also know how much Tom stresses over his products ,and like all of his products, Id be willing to bet that it it Top shelf quality.
Like I said, I will give my opinion/review when I get my hands on them and I will give an honest review which is what Tom want's.


I'm sorry if you had a different experience dealing with Tom, but I can only go by my own experiences and Tom's been nothing but great to me.
 
DADA":2au6pm9t said:
Sorry to disturb the party. But are you guys sure it is coaxial, strongly and well enough constructed, has the right Class poweramp and is worth this amount of money? Hype works I guess.
Concerning TK and JM I have very different "adventures". But then again if it works for you...be happy.
While I always appreciate your input from either the far left or far right side of the "all things Fractal" fence, I do have to ask, why do you have SUCH a hate on for them and anything related to?

Let me rephrase. I had my run up the flagpole with Mr. Chase at the onset of the A2's release; stating some poor business tactics that didn't bode well with me personally and professionally at that time. It was weird, and there were definite "issues" from a legal business point of view that I brought to the table. Sure, sure, it was met with infantile hostilities and then even weirder infantile pleads; but it was based on "something". That's over now, and I am - yes - still surprised that the corporate communications and model still seem to be managed by a bunch of bratty school children; but it is what it is.

You seem to watch - very carefully, consistently, and diligently - all things having to do with public discussions about Fractal, and now, Fractal's related business wares (ie: Atomic's CLR product). I find it cool that you're passionate about this topic, but what is it that drives you into such obsession about keeping them down and in a negative light? I agree, there's a LOT of blind faith going on with all things Fractal, a LOT. And I also agree that there's a lot of obfuscation at the business level - everything from Axe-Edit to mods deleting posts of intriguing content and question, firmware releases, etc. It's not a touch feely company at all. Any touchy feely comes from its users and their forum, which is also heavily policed. But all this aside, there is at the end of it - a good product and one than many musicians are growing to rely on completely. It works. And it's also extremely advanced, and I do applaud the engineering that's gone into this box and continues to go into this box, all politics aside. But what is it about Fractal that you despise so much?

Moving forward, Tom King is a stand up guy. Jay Mitchell knows his shit. The two of them have put together what has thus far been a very successful FRFR product. It's cheaper than a lot of the competition, yet ranks higher in performance than many of the competing products - several of which cost a lot more. They're designed in the US, and made in China. Regardless - they work and apparently sound terrific. It was said they're definitely coaxial, and this information was released at the onset. They could be lying - absolutely 100% - this is something they could be doing. They could be lying about the size of the driver, for sure. And already - because of the weird cloak and dagger manner by which almost everything pertaining to FAS has been delivered over the course of the last few years, many people suspect that there's something "not right" about them. But until proven otherwise, we have to go on what we're given. Looking at it from sheer lies and corporate profiteering, if the product sucked - we'd have heard about this by now. If the unit wasn't truly coaxial, this would have been communicated by one of or some of the suspicious people mentioned above. And if the drivers were mis-sized, we'd have had definitive proof thereof by now. But no, the waitlist is active and eager, and the product has delivered in all respects to those who have received it thus far.

So, sure, where there's reason to be suspicious and a little weirded out by these guys; we don't have concrete evidence as to their fucking us in broad daylight. So why the hate? I think Tom King and Jay have come together and put something cool out for us users - are they simply "guilty by association" in your perspective?

Let me know. Just curious.
Mo
 
The BS never ends. Facts follow:

1. The Atomic CLR is both coaxial and coincident. I've been doing loudspeaker R&D professionally for 30 years (DADA, what's your CV in this area?), and I have only ever designed coaxial/coincident speakers. The CLR continues this successful historical precedent.

2. The Atomic CLR is extremely rugged. It will withstand years of road use given reasonable handling. That doesn't mean it can't be broken. No matter how gorilla-proof you make something, there's a gorilla somewhere that is big, strong, and stupid enough to break it. It would appear that most of them have found employment at UPS.

3. The class of power amplification and signal processing employed in the active CLR is First Class. No amount of whining by wannabe competitors changes the fact that the amplification in the CLR is unsurpassed for this application.

4. Atomic is a separate company from Fractal Audio. The CLR is not "related" to the products of that other company.

5. DADA has had no dealings with Tom King or myself and therefore has no experience on which to base his personal attacks.
 
Thanks Jay.

2 Things:

First, just got off the horn with Tom. This guy's personal customer service never fails to impress. Furthermore, we're talking about passion in the product. Thanks for the call Tom. Very excited for you, Atomic, and all soon-to-be owners of your new product line.

Secondly, in my prose above, I didn't mean to "infer" that Atomic or their products were in any way "related" to Fractal. I just combined the two in a "plausible relationship" due to so many owners of the Fractal product currently lining up to be owners of the Atomic wares as well. It's an easy combination to assume will likely happen. I'm one of 'em, and there's a growing number on the FAS forum.

Congrats to a killer launch guys!
Mo
 
No problems, MO. I just wanted to clear the air, something that always seems to be necessary when DADA is around. :lol: :LOL:

The CLR will work with any modeler, not just an Axe-Fx, and it will perform better (IOW, sound better) than any of the competition when used as wedge, sidefill, or FOH speaker.
 
I bought an Atomic years ago off of Tom. Quality guy to deal with and great customer service! Will be buying the CLR cab from them in a couple of months. Can't wait!

:)
 
Jay - Any chance you guys will be manufacturing in the U.S.?
 
lester":12ipo4or said:
Jay - Any chance you guys will be manufacturing in the U.S.?
You'll have to see if Tom wants to field that one. I'm not Atomic, I'm a loudspeaker designer/company owner (another company) who performs R&D for Atomic.
 
lester":25p9vswt said:
Jay - Any chance you guys will be manufacturing in the U.S.?
And pay higher sticker prices for the product?
 
Is it really to save us some cash or is it for them to put more in their pockets? 2 grand for a couple of these is some serious coin.
I guess I'll have to pass on these for now.
:lol: :LOL: I'm holding out till these things go up in price. Until they can bring the price point up....I'm out.

I'm sorry....made in China...bleh :bleh:
 
If that is your political position, I won't take issue with it. If you are implying that the quality or performance of the CLR is in any way compromised because of the country of manufacture, you could not be more mistaken. I set the QC pass/fail criteria that every speaker must pass, and I personally verify that those criteria are being applied. The performance criteria that CLRs must meet to be accepted are at least as rigorous as those being by any other manufacturer of SR loudspeakers. At any price.
 
Are you saying the speakers themselves are being manufactured in China as well?
What is the breakdown of country of origin in the make up of this product?
 
Back
Top