BE channel of BE-100 (2016) vs. BE of JJ

  • Thread starter Thread starter idnotbe
  • Start date Start date
16/10/16. Yep, that’s the schematic I have.

Thanks for all the info. I really appreciate it!
 
I owned a 2014 Smallbox. The hybrid PCB version but still with Mallory caps.
The first voltage divider was 68k / 100k to ground. First coupling cap was .0047uf.
The entire pre amp was fed from a single 10k + 16uf filter, as stated above.
That amp sounded very good.
I have the same era BE100, so the Smallbox went in a deal for an LP Custom.
I believe that era BE100 is the best sounding / feeling due to the power supply design used ( and since changed with the swap to Synergy caps in the later amps )
The configuration of the power supply rail is the key to getting the desired tones and feel with most amps / mods.
 
fusedbrain":1edqxm14 said:
I owned a 2014 Smallbox. The hybrid PCB version but still with Mallory caps.
The first voltage divider was 68k / 100k to ground. First coupling cap was .0047uf.
The entire pre amp was fed from a single 10k + 16uf filter, as stated above.

Alright so both schematics have errors on them.

Yeah that single node 10k+16uf for the whole preamp is from jtm45. The DS has the same, except with a tube rectifier.

I just converted a 50w plexi to that single node 16uf filter, and did the Dirty Shirley circuit in the pre. DAYUM it's soooooo good, guy is coming to pick that amp up tonight, and I told him he's gonna have to fight me for it. :lol: :LOL:
 
The schematic I have has a 10k between each of the 3 preamp tubes.

Drawing by E.S. I imagine you all have seen it.
 
11blueegyptians":145aeb50 said:
The schematic I have has a 10k between each of the 3 preamp tubes.

Drawing by E.S. I imagine you all have seen it.
Yes, I believe that's the drawing we are all talking about.
It's not correct
 
CNutz":1bojbq7t said:
fusedbrain":1bojbq7t said:
I owned a 2014 Smallbox. The hybrid PCB version but still with Mallory caps.
The first voltage divider was 68k / 100k to ground. First coupling cap was .0047uf.
The entire pre amp was fed from a single 10k + 16uf filter, as stated above.

Alright so both schematics have errors on them.

Yeah that single node 10k+16uf for the whole preamp is from jtm45. The DS has the same, except with a tube rectifier.

I just converted a 50w plexi to that single node 16uf filter, and did the Dirty Shirley circuit in the pre. DAYUM it's soooooo good, guy is coming to pick that amp up tonight, and I told him he's gonna have to fight me for it. :lol: :LOL:
Dirty Shirley circuit is some of Dave's best work :rock:
My DS clone is one of my favorite amps.
I can get better high gain tones with other amps, but the DS set to lower gain is the best JTM45 tone I've ever heard. Just F'n spectacular :thumbsup:
I actually ditched the 3.3k/.68uf option on the structure switch, and I just run 10k / 4.7k sellectable via foot switch as a boost function.
Damn I love that amp :yes:
 
fusedbrain":8g8amgkm said:
Dirty Shirley circuit is some of Dave's best work :rock:
My DS clone is one of my favorite amps.
I can get better high gain tones with other amps, but the DS set to lower gain is the best JTM45 tone I've ever heard. Just F'n spectacular :thumbsup:
I actually ditched the 3.3k/.68uf option on the structure switch, and I just run 10k / 4.7k sellectable via foot switch as a boost function.
Damn I love that amp :yes:

The new Twin Sister seems to be better at high gain than the regular DS.
 
Jon BCN":2mfojl6q said:
The new Twin Sister seems to be better at high gain than the regular DS.
Judging by that Johan Segeborn Twin Sister vid, yes I would agree.
The addition of the bright switches helps, as does the speaker choice.
It should also be noted that Dave appears to have moved away from using those small, black silver mica caps for treble peakers and tone stack, in favor of a ceramic style in some newer builds. This may account for some of the aggressiveness in the Twin Sister tone.
Those little black mica caps are smoooooth......and yes, it DOES make a difference :yes:

Also, I didn't mean to imply that higher gain tones with regular DS are lacking. They are quite good.
Just that with tube rectifier and lower filtering, it is not my first choice for that sound.
 
fusedbrain":2ret9r2y said:
It should also be noted that Dave appears to have moved away from using those small, black silver mica caps for treble peakers and tone stack, in favor of a ceramic style in some newer builds. This may account for some of the aggressiveness in the Twin Sister tone.
Those little black mica caps are smoooooth......and yes, it DOES make a difference :yes:


Dave told me he now uses Vishay 562R10TST47 for 470pf. I ordered some, but have not tried them yet. I've been using Vishay ceramics for awhile, but there are so many different ceramic dielectric types, and yup they all sound different. The one Dave is using has X5F dielectric, I've used those in different values, and they sound good.
 
CNutz":3qr1aat0 said:
fusedbrain":3qr1aat0 said:
It should also be noted that Dave appears to have moved away from using those small, black silver mica caps for treble peakers and tone stack, in favor of a ceramic style in some newer builds. This may account for some of the aggressiveness in the Twin Sister tone.
Those little black mica caps are smoooooth......and yes, it DOES make a difference :yes:


Dave told me he now uses Vishay 562R10TST47 for 470pf. I ordered some, but have not tried them yet. I've been using Vishay ceramics for awhile, but there are so many different ceramic dielectric types, and yup they all sound different. The one Dave is using has X5F dielectric, I've used those in different values, and they sound good.

Thanks for that! Those are available in 10% tolerance in all the good values from Mouser.
I think I'll order some up and try 'em.
Funny thing about those black silver mica caps: In all the Friedman style builds I've done, I could never get the amps to sound right, or "like a Friedman" unless I used those mica caps, and that particular ( and now obsolete ) .680uf electrolytic he uses on the cathodes.
Sum of the parts......
 
fusedbrain":2iawxg3z said:
Funny thing about those black silver mica caps: In all the Friedman style builds I've done, I could never get the amps to sound right, or "like a Friedman" unless I used those mica caps, and that particular ( and now obsolete ) .680uf electrolytic he uses on the cathodes.
Sum of the parts......

True. I bought 50 or so of those .68 Nichicon PM series caps when I seen they were obsolete. I should have bought more. Those sound great in a lot of different circuits.

I also started thinking about the longevity of those, I mean they are electrolytic, they will need to be replaced at some point.
 
fusedbrain":2ck4xe5p said:
Jon BCN":2ck4xe5p said:
The new Twin Sister seems to be better at high gain than the regular DS.
Judging by that Johan Segeborn Twin Sister vid, yes I would agree.
The addition of the bright switches helps, as does the speaker choice.
It should also be noted that Dave appears to have moved away from using those small, black silver mica caps for treble peakers and tone stack, in favor of a ceramic style in some newer builds. This may account for some of the aggressiveness in the Twin Sister tone.
Those little black mica caps are smoooooth......and yes, it DOES make a difference :yes:

Also, I didn't mean to imply that higher gain tones with regular DS are lacking. They are quite good.
Just that with tube rectifier and lower filtering, it is not my first choice for that sound.

The BE100 Deluxe seems to be more aggressive too, it has a grain almost fuzz like in the distortion in the videos I have seen, reminds me a little bit of the Butterslax, but not that extreme grainy like.

Doesn't seem as polish and smooth as previous itinerations.
 
Back
Top