CCV vs Friedman BE 100

  • Thread starter Thread starter RG955TT
  • Start date Start date
R

RG955TT

New member
Anyone with both and could give me the low down would be appreciated. Thanks
 
RG955TT":11hqs4px said:
Anyone with both and could give me the low down would be appreciated. Thanks
BE = modded Marshall

CCV = modded Bogner
 
LP Freak":3i0vevdl said:
RG955TT":3i0vevdl said:
Anyone with both and could give me the low down would be appreciated. Thanks
BE = modded Marshall

CCV = modded Bogner

goldwing68nv":3i0vevdl said:
actually i just played both amps for the 1st time last week while at dave friedman's shop on my way thru calif...hard to compare them(or say that one is better than the other) as they are quite different from each other,tonally,imo...the BE-100 sounds like a classic,old school hotrodded marshall plexi tone.the CCV sounds more like a refined bogner ecstasy type tone with a bit of mesa boogie in it.both can cover a wide range of tones.i played the BE-100 first,then the CCV,then went back to the BE-100.i def preferred the BE-100,but that's just me...

rokker":3i0vevdl said:
Goldwing is right on the money.
Be-100 is the ultimate modded marshall
Ccv is more like he said...a tight super high gain xtc witha dose of mesa and marshall thrown on top.

Having owned both i prefer the Friedman...it is a killer killer amp
 
Thanks!!! I am the quote Master!!! :rock: :rock: :rock: :lol: :LOL: :lol: :LOL: :lol: :LOL:

This question was also asked in the Cameron forum so I thought I would work my quote magic!! :lol: :LOL: :lol: :LOL:
 
Back
Top