Celestion Lynchback vs Weber Legacy comparison clip

  • Thread starter Thread starter EyesOfTheSouth
  • Start date Start date
I care where it's made. Especially when they charge 130 a speaker - absolutely ridiculous. If i pay 130 a speaker i want it handbuilt buy someone who cares about what they're doing not some 10 year old child in china making.50 cents a day lol. I find it odd how.people will go.ape shit if.somebody asks too much for a piece of used gear, yet dont think twice at all about a manufacturer greasin up a 12 inch schlong and asking.them to bend over lol....
 
How were the amp settings?

I would have given more highs and presence with the Webers.
 
I preferred the weber, I liked the added chime and smoothness. The lynchbacks sounded a touch buzzy and too crisp by comparison. I thought both sounded good, and the lynchbacks I think will be less crisp as they break in. IMO both sounded good, hard for me to understand those that thought one blew the other way or describing one as horrible.
 
Lynchback was really nice. Good sonic balance and spank. Weber was full but sounded uninspired thru that rig.
 
Mesa\Kramer":3f5dyarh said:
Lynchback sounded great

Weber sounded dull and flat
I kinda begrudgingly have to agree. I mean, the Weber's not bad at all - on its own - but back to back?? No dice. The LB slays it.

Nice comparo - thanks for posting.
 
I listened back again and on first listen i liked the LB but the weber has a nice girthy warmth to the top end. They sound great in the room when you are playing them though. Great cure for harsh highs.
 
Back
Top