Climate change in NYS

  • Thread starter Thread starter dcburn
  • Start date Start date
Floyd Eye said:
Say “ no politics just straight facts”.

Then post about how mud feels in a lake or how a farmers field is as if it’s conclusive fact that it’s because of the evil oil companies. Again.

Then smile about a job well done while sitting in your house, heated by fossil fuel, using electricity, generated by fossil fuel, maybe drive up to town in a car powered by fossil fuel.
Click to expand...
I mean…… pretty much.


These are the same folk on the Far Woke Left who have robbed children of their education and brought it to below average levels and who have destroyed science in the name of WokeDucation and Nu-Science…….



We just cant take anything they say seriously at all when it comes to education or science on any matter.
 
Floyd Eye said:
Say “ no politics just straight facts”.

Then post about how mud feels in a lake or how a farmers field is as if it’s conclusive fact that it’s because of the evil oil companies. Again.

Then smile about a job well done while sitting in your house, heated by fossil fuel, using electricity, generated by fossil fuel, maybe drive up to town in a car powered by fossil fuel.
Click to expand...
Nope. My house is fully electric. My electricity is 100% hydro. And I own 3 EVs.
Back to the ignore list for you.
 
Robostyle said:
Post pics of your 3 EVs
Scooters and bicycles don't count
Click to expand...
Nah, But I will tell you what they are. Tesla Model Y, Kia Niro EV, and Mitsubishi i-Miev. We haven't owned a gas vehicle in 5 years. Anyways take care.
 
By the way, NZs renewable energy ( 80% ) is largely subsidized by and their energy self sufficiency depends on oil and gas and coal. Which they export in high quantities.

So it’s like buying carbon credits. It’s not less pollution you just get to virtue signal about how much you supposedly care about global warming.
 
Floyd Eye said:
Say “ no politics just straight facts”.

Then post about how mud feels in a lake or how a farmers field is as if it’s conclusive fact that it’s because of the evil oil companies. Again.

Then smile about a job well done while sitting in your house, heated by fossil fuel, using electricity, generated by fossil fuel, maybe drive up to town in a car powered by fossil fuel.
Click to expand...
The fact that climate change is real, and happening, doesn’t become less of a fact because the person who said it isn’t doing everything they can to “lessen their footprint”

The world is still carbon dependent, but understanding why that is a bad thing is the first step towards changing it.
 
Robostyle said:
Don't forget-
"Trust the science"
That aged like milk
Click to expand...
I’m only picking in you because I think you have a chance of grasping the significance, but the effects of climate change are not new.

People figured it out hundreds of years ago, in Europe, long before politicians began using it as ammo for the easily amused
 
Dan Gleesak said:
The fact that climate change is real, and happening, doesn’t become less of a fact because the person who said it isn’t doing everything they can to “lessen their footprint”

The world is still carbon dependent, but understanding why that is a bad thing is the first step towards changing it.
Click to expand...
Ok. But how does that invalidate anything I said ?
 
Dan Gleesak said:
I’m only picking in you because I think you have a chance of grasping the significance, but the effects of climate change are not new.

People figured it out hundreds of years ago, in Europe, long before politicians began using it as ammo for the easily amused
Click to expand...
My comment is harking back to the slogan so often pumped out during Covid.
"Trust the science"
Remember that?
ETA:
"You have to wear your mask, so my mask will work"
"You have to get the vaccine, so my vaccine will work"
That doesn't sound like science to me
 
Robostyle said:
My comment is harking back to the slogan so often pumped out during Covid.
"Trust the science"
Remember that?
Click to expand...
Vaguely. There were a lot of slogans going around then

But to touch on the extra you added, yea that’s science too. If people stayed away from eachother for 2 weeks it would have nearly killed the virus.

Realistically that was not possible though, so in comes politics to decide who can still move about and why. Some counties handled it better than others and some countries had a lot more die than the others.

So the “mantra” changed to “slow the spread” which is really where it should have stayed. Everything recommend, if done with good faith, would have slowed the spread, masks and vaccines included.

But then the politics and memes started flowing to the point where people didn’t understand why masks and vaccines were beneficial, and they clung to the extremes of their political sides. Anyone that says masks don’t help is equally as uniformed as someone who says a vaccine will 100% work.
 
Last edited:
Dan Gleesak said:
The stuff he said was facts not politics

Responses like yours are a result of people politicizing facts.
Click to expand...
It’s settled science right ?

There are a lot of scientists who don’t believe the climate change alarmist creed when it comes to blaming man made industry for it. Or how much it actually contributes to it.

I’d say what politicizes it is when governments subsidize things like Solyndra or the green new deal. Or when someone posts the same talking points about it repeatedly as if it was settled science over and over.

Just my opinion. 💁‍♂️
 
Floyd Eye said:
It’s settled science right ?

There are a lot of scientists who don’t believe the climate change alarmist creed when it comes to blaming man made industry for it. Or how much it actually contributes to it.

I’d say what politicizes it is when governments subsidize things like Solyndra or the green new deal. Or when someone posts the same talking points about it repeatedly as if it was settled science over and over.

Just my opinion. 💁‍♂️
Click to expand...

You bring up “alarmist creed” to make it political.
Scientists can debate how dire the effects will be all they want, but the scientific community as a whole, world wide, is quite settled on what our consumption is doing to our planet. The only thing unsettled is what else are we to change on top of the climate
 
Dan Gleesak said:
You bring up “alarmist creed” to make it political.
Scientists can debate how dire the effects will be all they want, but the scientific community as a whole, world wide, is quite settled on what our consumption is doing to our planet. The only thing unsettled is what else are we to change on top of the climate
Click to expand...
Come on Dan. Me bringing up the alarmist creed ( ie Al Gore and little Greta crying and claiming the polar bears are going extinct or we have 12 years before massive flooding etc.) isn’t politicizing it. Going around saying that kind of shit is politicizing it. I mean unless you’re trying to say Greta and Al are right. Greta notably has gone on to bigger and better things to be ashamed of us all for.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top