Climate change in NYS

  • Thread starter Thread starter dcburn
  • Start date Start date
Dan Gleesak said:
Not so much about your scientific knowledge, base, but the way you talk about it.
When someone uses COVID and Chromosomes to discount climate change, they really aren’t interested in talking about climate change.
Click to expand...
Exactly. Whataboutism is a sad argument.
 
Dan Gleesak said:
Not so much about your scientific knowledge, base, but the way you talk about it. My hopes for potential discussion on this board.
When someone uses COVID and Chromosomes to discount climate change, they really aren’t interested in talking about climate change.
Click to expand...
I never discounted it
Just saying science is not infallible like you seem to think it is, and gave an example of that.
Is it that inconvenient of a truth that science is not 100% correct all the time?
The guys in the white lab coats are humans, and therefore are not perfect?
 
1752151370479.png
 
Robostyle said:
I never discounted it
Just saying science is not infallible like you seem to think it is, and gave an example of that.
Is it that inconvenient of a truth that science is not 100% correct all the time?
The guys in the white lab coats are humans, and therefore are not perfect?
Click to expand...

But when I obliged and gave you a counter argument for Covid you said that it just wasn’t your thing. Science is pretty rock solid, what talking heads do with it is what is fallible.
That’s why I stress to ignore the rhetoric and headlines about climate change and look at the actual studies. It’s one of the most blatantly obvious phenomena to ever be studied
 
Also I want to add, this is what hatter thinks circular arguments are. A thread talking climate change, someone else going off on Covid and gender tangents, and me trying to bring it back the thread topic.
 
Dan Gleesak said:
Science is pretty rock solid, what talking heads do with it is what is fallible.
Click to expand...
Here is where we disagree.
Human beings are fallible, the scientist has the potential to be just as wrong as the talking heads.
Lab coat is not some magic garment that makes one perfect.
Also i don't believe in "settled science", as science is an ongoing process.
 
Dan Gleesak said:
Also I want to add, this is what hatter thinks circular arguments are. A thread talking climate change, someone else going off on Covid and gender tangents, and me trying to bring it back the thread topic.
Click to expand...
Hahahahahahahaha
I thought we were discussing science (climate science) and pretty sure science covers a lot more than just the climate.
 
Robostyle said:
Here is where we disagree.
Human beings are fallible, the scientist has the potential to be just as wrong as the talking heads.
Lab coat is not some magic garment that makes one perfect.
Also i don't believe in "settled science", as science is an ongoing process.
Click to expand...

Humans are fallible yes. That’s why I preach the scientific method. One human is fallible. Hundreds or thousands of humans from all over the world, using different methods of study, over hundreds of years, that all come to the same conclusions…. Is pretty rock solid.
 
Dan Gleesak said:
But when I obliged and gave you a counter argument for Covid you said that it just wasn’t your thing. Science is pretty rock solid, what talking heads do with it is what is fallible.
That’s why I stress to ignore the rhetoric and headlines about climate change and look at the actual studies. It’s one of the most blatantly obvious phenomena to ever be studied
Click to expand...
These cultists won't believe until their house burns down around them.
 
Dan Gleesak said:
Also I want to add, this is what hatter thinks circular arguments are. A thread talking climate change, someone else going off on Covid and gender tangents, and me trying to bring it back the thread topic.
Click to expand...
Why are you trying to drag me into this? I wasn't part of your conversation. Seems like your becoming obsessed with me.
 
Robostyle said:
Hahahahahahahaha
I thought we were discussing science (climate science) and pretty sure science covers a lot more than just the climate.
Click to expand...

That’s the fallacy right there. When the person who made it not about climate change anymore says “hey I thought with was about science in general” when someone else tries to keep it on the original topic.
Textbook example
 
Dan Gleesak said:
Humans are fallible yes. That’s why I preach the scientific method. One human is fallible. Hundreds or thousands of humans from all over the world, using different methods of study, over hundreds of years, that all come to the same conclusions…. Is pretty rock solid.
Click to expand...
Except they don't all come to the exact same conclusions. Similar though, i'll give you that.
I'm just not sure humans are as smart as we think we are, that's all.
 
Dan Gleesak said:
That’s the fallacy right there. When the person who made it not about climate change anymore says “hey I thought with was about science in general” when someone else tries to keep it on the original topic.
Textbook example
Click to expand...
So science has nothing to do with climate change?
 
Endless examples of the “ scientific community” being wildly inaccurate. Excuses will be made, lies will be told. The core belief isn’t scientific at all. And it’s shared by countless “ professors” from “ prestigious “ universities. “ We are the most intelligent life forms in existence and if you doubt us it’s because you’re stupid”.
 
Robostyle said:
So science has nothing to do with climate change?
Click to expand...
Floyd Eye said:
Endless examples of the “ scientific community” being wildly inaccurate. Excuses will be made, lies will be told. The core belief isn’t scientific at all. And it’s shared by countless “ professors” from “ prestigious “ universities. “ We are the most intelligent life forms in existence and if you doubt us it’s because you’re stupid”.
Click to expand...

Don’t be dumbasses
 
Robostyle said:
Except they don't all come to the exact same conclusions. Similar though, i'll give you that.
I'm just not sure humans are as smart as we think we are, that's all.
Click to expand...

Human activity is making the planet warmer. That is a fact. It’s that simple.
If people want to go off on tangents from there, that’s fine.
But if they can’t accept that as a baseline truth, whatever they say after that is nonsense
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top