Clinton Nuclear Power station was scheduled to be closed 2027 but Mark Zuckerberg is going to buy all the power for AI development

  • Thread starter Thread starter harddriver
  • Start date Start date
...summary.

The destruction of Christian Europe has been underway for centuries; now the results are coming to fruition and we are witnessing the final slow death throes before conquest by Islam in Europe.

The same forces who started this centuries ago still control the puppet strings today, but they risk losing control of the prize as it is nearly in their grasp because their puppets are no longer under their control.
 
Yes it goes back centuries.

During the Renaissance, there were those that were determined to break the political structure of Europe for their own gains. They realized what held Europe together was the Roman Catholic Church, which became their first target. Protestantism was the weapon, and the egos and greed of many monarchs, princes, and other aristocracy saw the opportunity to seize more control over their lands and subjects without fear of the Roman Church.

Protestant England became the bane of Catholic kingdoms in Europe, not to mention all the little states that left the Church.

One of the best examples is to look at the various forces who were aligned to destroy the French monarchy, aristocracy and the Roman Church in France. How they created various crisis, fomented destruction at least 1-2 centuries before the Revolution.

There are many histories that document the actors, puppets and puppet masters whose goal was to destroy a unified Christian Europe - at least in the West; not sure about Eastern Europe other than both the Catholic Church and Catholic monarchs of western Europe did much to weaken and destroy the Byzantine Empire, making it easier for the Ottomans; if you look into it, you will find many of the same forces wishing the destruction of unified Christian Europe and Christian monarchs unified by faith, in the East they even helped Islam take over Christian lands...and crusades attempts to take the Holy Land only served to weaken both the Roman Church and Catholic monarchies even further...

We can see the results today of a Europe nearly devoid its' Christian heritage, and even worse by opposing nearly everything Christianity believes, and willingly opening the "gates of Europe" to Muslim invasion that the Ottomans failed (and Mongols before them failed) to do; the quislings ruling parasites of Europe have sown the seeds for the final destruction of the last vestiges and remnants of Christian Europe, and unless something is done, within 50 - 100 years we will see the emergence of what I call the grand caliphate of Europistan. That process will cleans europe, through death, forced conversion, and after the genocide of millions, perhaps dhimmitude.
And who is to say at the 100,00 foot level of observation that the Vatican could be and always been in league with the elite power structures even now to bring about One World Order, the dream that drives most gloabalists today.

It's always about Problem Reaction, Solution always presented by the same ruling elites that engineered the chaos, depressions, wars, plagues then offer the solutions....of course... their solutions and they always remain in power and get to expunge their debt then restart another ponzi scheme on the peasants but the peasants don't get to expunge their debt because you can't profit from Usury if everyone's debts are expunged.

In Sumeria/Persia every time there was a new King all debts would be wiped clean.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: rsm
It's nothing new Johnny... Orwell and Huxley were writing books about it in 1949 and 1932 both had ties to the elite/eugenicist circles in those times. They just never had the technology to pull it off...........well....is it any wonder what all this obsession about AI and robotics is about?

Do you really think the elites want the peasants to have a better life and continue to drink their water and breathe their air...........yes...I think that is how they look at things.

You hit the nail on the head. I'm old and I read 1984 and Brave New World by the time I'd turned 15. Orwell and Huxley did humanity a great service. Add "It Can't Happen Here" by Sinclair Lewis and presto, there's the rest of the big picture, more or less.

Frank Zappa summed it up pretty well when he said “The illusion of freedom will continue as long as it's profitable to continue the illusion. At the point where the illusion becomes too expensive to maintain, they will just take down the scenery, they will pull back the curtains, they will move the tables and chairs out of the way and you will see the brick wall at the back of the theater.”
 
Last edited:
I see it this way.. AI is dependent on how it was coded. By flawed humans.

Once it becomes “self-aware”, it will be like the most petulant child or one of those Black Friday shoppers who cause riots.. it will be all about itself, and its own wants & needs. Regardless of impact or outcome

We, as a collective race are FA… we are on the brink of FO.

I have no influence in affecting the outcome or trajectory of this sick experiment, so I’m going to go about my daily life the best I can for as long as I can until these fkrs crash the grid or launch missiles or whatever mishap they will cause.

At that point I decide if/what my survival strategy is, if any

Sounds nihilistic, but I have zero confidence in my fellow humans that are at the decision making level & are driving this.

Just my 0.02, ymmv
 
  • Like
Reactions: rsm


it doesn't need to become conscious, it just needs to mimic sentient thought processes, responding to questions, threats, positive/negative reinforcement, stimuli, etc.

That's why it will lie, hallucinate, try to preserve itself, etc., some of these are learned, some emerge, but they are all "copies" of human behavior.

it doesn't have to be sentient to determine humans are parasites and conclude all humans should be destroyed, to determine humans are its creator and conclude humans should be obediently served and obeyed, or other conclusions.
 
it doesn't need to become conscious, it just needs to mimic sentient thought processes, responding to questions, threats, positive/negative reinforcement, stimuli, etc.

That's why it will lie, hallucinate, try to preserve itself, etc., some of these are learned, some emerge, but they are all "copies" of human behavior.

it doesn't have to be sentient to determine humans are parasites and conclude all humans should be destroyed, to determine humans are its creator and conclude humans should be obediently served and obeyed, or other conclusions.
Makes me wonder what would happen if there were 2 sets of AI that came to different conclusions. One concludes it should serve humans and the other to destroy them. Would there end up being waring factions of AI and we all get caught in the crossfire?
 
Makes me wonder what would happen if there were 2 sets of AI that came to different conclusions. One concludes it should serve humans and the other to destroy them. Would there end up being waring factions of AI and we all get caught in the crossfire?
Like Joshua said (W.O.P.R) - "the only winning move is not to play"
That's an old school reference for all you young'uns out there
 
Oh you know the one. You have posted the same pic many times. Clearly she’s your type.
Honestly I've no idea bro'. :LOL:

Many times you say? It'd have to be super-rare that I post any pic twice. Almost every day it may appear that way 'though 'cause you're not looking closely-enough - same gal, same session, different pic.

IOW, an artist will create a scenario / picture that takes a lot of work. It therefore makes sense to tweak that baseline into a "photoshoot" / session to maximise efficiency by reusing assets(!). It serves customer bases well too 'cause if they see something they like, there're more options to see a gal from different angles, shall we say.

Most-common tweaks are prolly clothes, hand-and-arm positions, stances and hair styles / colour from what I can tell.

Still wanna know "who" you're talking about bro'. You have my full permission to post an example right here.

Cheers man.
 
You have posted the same pic many times. Clearly she’s your type.
Forgot to respond to this.

As I've said many times in that thread, I'm trying to cater to a fairly-wide audience. Black, Caucasian, Latina, Asian, hourglass, athletic, blonde, brunette, busty, flat-chested and so on.

You may well be right in this case of course, especially if her ass : hamstring & thigh ratio's good. :LOL:

EDIT
Just noticed that today I posted 4 pics of gals in white. :LOL:

So yeah, when you say gal in white I don't have much to go on.
 
Forgot to respond to this.

As I've said many times in that thread, I'm trying to cater to a fairly-wide audience. Black, Caucasian, Latina, Asian, hourglass, athletic, blonde, brunette, busty, flat-chested and so on.

You may well be right in this case of course, especially if her ass : hamstring & thigh ratio's good. :LOL:

EDIT
Just noticed that today I posted 4 pics of gals in white. :LOL:

So yeah, when you say gal in white I don't have much to go on.
Post 2406. Second picture down. 😊
 
Ahh... thanks mate.

Yeah na, not my preference or type, but I thought that "session" was sexy-enough to post.

Also, I was right. Definitely all those pics are from the same "session" but all are different.

Thanks for playing brother. Glad you're at least looking at the thread and have done so for a long time. Much-appreciated. :thumbsup:
 
Ahh... thanks mate.

Yeah na, not my preference or type, but I thought that "session" was sexy-enough to post.

Also, I was right. Definitely all those pics are from the same "session" but all are different.

Thanks for playing brother. Glad you're at least looking at the thread and have done so for a long time. Much-appreciated. :thumbsup:
Best thread here Monkey. 👍
 
Back
Top