C
chris lykins
Active member
I have a wizard MCII and I just wish the cleans were more to my liking! That would make it perfect. Any suggestions. I was thinking an eq for the clean channel may do the trick
chris lykins":27n4tes2 said:I have a wizard MCII and I just wish the cleans were more to my liking! That would make it perfect. Any suggestions. I was thinking an eq for the clean channel may do the trick
LP Freak":3s9hi7wk said:Great amps but tuned to Z they both sound the same
My ears said: The Wizard is the clear winner of the comparison.godgrinder":17zzcjrq said:Seems like these 2 amps get compared a lot so I did a quick comparison clip. Just some random jams, excuse my shitty playing.
I agree but to a lesser degree of difference..I would put the MCI at #1 and the SLO at 1B when it comes to clarity and articulation, clean channel etc. Wizard wins but the SLO is incredible as well.SQUAREHEAD":38k3p58x said:Wizard of Ozz":38k3p58x said:I've compared my 2018 MC2 & MTL to a 2018 SLO side by side over several days... the Wizards were far and above the better sounding amps for my taste. Not even close for me. The tightness, articulation, focus, and faster response/feel put the Wizards in another class alone, just based on lead channel vs lead channel. The Wizards also do not fall apart or change in tone or bottom end, regardless of volume. Not the same from the SLO. The clean channel comparison was a landslide in favor of the Wizards as well.
What he said,![]()
I agree about the 2C+ cleans, but I think the cleans of my 2016 Wizard MTL 100 aren’t far behind. If non-high gain amps were included I’d put my 64 Vibroverb and Todd Sharp JOAT 45 ahead of the 2C+ for cleans, but that’d be it of everything I’ve triedRacerxrated":33wkpu9s said:I agree but to a lesser degree of difference..I would put the MCI at #1 and the SLO at 1B when it comes to clarity and articulation, clean channel etc. Wizard wins but the SLO is incredible as well.SQUAREHEAD":33wkpu9s said:Wizard of Ozz":33wkpu9s said:I've compared my 2018 MC2 & MTL to a 2018 SLO side by side over several days... the Wizards were far and above the better sounding amps for my taste. Not even close for me. The tightness, articulation, focus, and faster response/feel put the Wizards in another class alone, just based on lead channel vs lead channel. The Wizards also do not fall apart or change in tone or bottom end, regardless of volume. Not the same from the SLO. The clean channel comparison was a landslide in favor of the Wizards as well.
What he said,![]()
Mark 2C+ has the best clean of any high gain amp I've played. And it's not even close.
braintheory":10y9fekb said:I agree about the 2C+ cleans, but I think the cleans of my 2016 Wizard MTL 100 aren’t far behind. If non-high gain amps were included I’d put my 64 Vibroverb and Todd Sharp JOAT 45 ahead of the 2C+ for cleans, but that’d be it of everything I’ve triedRacerxrated":10y9fekb said:I agree but to a lesser degree of difference..I would put the MCI at #1 and the SLO at 1B when it comes to clarity and articulation, clean channel etc. Wizard wins but the SLO is incredible as well.SQUAREHEAD":10y9fekb said:Wizard of Ozz":10y9fekb said:I've compared my 2018 MC2 & MTL to a 2018 SLO side by side over several days... the Wizards were far and above the better sounding amps for my taste. Not even close for me. The tightness, articulation, focus, and faster response/feel put the Wizards in another class alone, just based on lead channel vs lead channel. The Wizards also do not fall apart or change in tone or bottom end, regardless of volume. Not the same from the SLO. The clean channel comparison was a landslide in favor of the Wizards as well.
What he said,![]()
Mark 2C+ has the best clean of any high gain amp I've played. And it's not even close.
Out of curiosity, have you owned a SLO and one your Wizards at the same time to compare? I ask because my experience comparing the 2 was pretty much the same as what Wizard of Ozz described