CNutz' Underboob Thread Deleted. WTF?

sytharnia1560 said:
To me the weird thing is a topic with females wearing next to nothing (that they are quite happy to put online) gets pulled ... yet people on here can call each other "fag" "homo" "cunt" and other sorts of babyish child like name calling and it is fine. And a few of those people never ever comment on actual guitar related stuff--on a guitar related parts of the forum
Click to expand...
Jokes aside for a moment.

This is the century of the hypocrite from every corner.

A (nature's creation) boob post gets nuked however, RT's emojis could be considered offensive & some of a sexual nature. Hypocrisy in play.....as usual.

Subjectivity is not consistent, not the truth, not reality, it's a pseudo form of reality/reaction of a mind that hasn't yet concluded true intent from the sender or nature's way.

We see today the weaponization of subjectivity because humans are waring creatures and can't help themselves no matter how evolved they believe they are. Fact is, we haven't come forward one inch. We have sophisticated toys, views, words & weapons but our use of them all remains the same as when we started.

Humans need to fully accept what they are and life everywhere would be far easier. We work, we eat and we procreate as intended by the almighty....nature. Procreation is our main objective at all times and visual stimulus assists in getting the job done faster and more frequently.

So called intellects and social warriors need to realise nature's intent & leave well alone.

Money is not God and therefore should not interfere with nature's way. Because at the end of all this hypocrisy, in this century, money is the motivator and end game to them all.
 
RelicStrat said:
Jokes aside for a moment.

This is the century of the hypocrite from every corner.

A (nature's creation) boob post gets nuked however, RT's emojis could be considered offensive & some of a sexual nature. Hypocrisy in play.....as usual.

Subjectivity is not consistent, not the truth, not reality, it's a pseudo form of reality/reaction of a mind that hasn't yet concluded true intent from the sender or nature's way.

We see today the weaponization of subjectivity because humans are waring creatures and can't help themselves no matter how evolved they believe they are. Fact is, we haven't come forward one inch. We have sophisticated toys, views, words & weapons but our use of them all remains the same as when we started.

Humans need to fully accept what they are and life everywhere would be far easier. We work, we eat and we procreate as intended by the almighty....nature. Procreation is our main objective at all times and visual stimulus assists in getting the job done faster and more frequently.

So called intellects and social warriors need to realise nature's intent & leave well alone.

Money is not God and therefore should not interfere with nature's way. Because at the end of all this hypocrisy, in this century, money is the motivator and end game to them all.
Click to expand...
Money gets dudes laid much more often than pictures on the internet, just ask any incel.
 
fantom said:
So first off, I agree with you on a personal level.
Click to expand...
:thumbsup:
fantom said:
That being said, is it really the right place? Let's say I find someone who wants to be objectified and offered them cash to walk around in a Target all week wearing a bikini. Would I expect annoyed customers? Yep. Would I expect the Target to ask her to leave or put on clothes? Definitely. Would I throw a fit if Target called the police and kicked her out of the store? Nope.
Click to expand...
Two major flaws in this argument:

1) The "Target"(!) audience is wildly-different.
2) The pics were "buried" in a thread in the OT subforum. IOW, those bikini gals are not wandering around on the main floor of the establishment. The equivalent would be confining them to a room out the back of Target with a sign on the door warning that offence may be taken if one enters. Rig Talk even has this warning as the subtitle to this subforum.
fantom said:
The first 2-3 paragraphs of text are detracting from your main point, that you think the mods overstepped boundaries. This is akin to saying you would prefer the Target manager ask the women to put on clothes before calling the police.
Click to expand...
Disagree.

Those paragraphs addressed the proposition that had been forwarded that we were objectifying them. So, I pointed out that our actions were natural-and-understandable (not exploitative) and that the gals themselves had already made the decision to voluntarily portray themselves as "objects" of desire.

Had I not addressed the accusation, the overall argument would've been half-arsed / incomplete. Those two points are foundational pillars IMHO and can't be ignored, lest we build our house on sand.
fantom said:
And I think my point is, who cares? The chick can be in the store, and I'll look. And if she gets kicked out, why start acting like Target is stepping on my dick and corrupting my merchandise? I can still shop at Target and not give a crap because I have no expectations that bikini-clad women are running around the store in the first place.
Click to expand...
'Cause Target told you that you can use the back room for anything you like except porn and threats of physical violence, that's why.

fantom said:
This is a gear forum, not a beach.
Click to expand...
Indeed, and OT is for cars, chicks, alcohol, cooking, movies and everything else that interests rockers.

You've argued numerous times using the straw man, "... the forum is for...". This is true only of the main RT and manufacturer subforums, not OT Central.

Cheers bud. :cheers2:
 
Last edited:
Picasso said:
Never said anything about the Monkey, just you, the creepy fuck.
Click to expand...

If you were calling me creepy for starting a underboob thread, then you also included anyone that participated.

I have a feeling your husband went all out Karen, then spoke to the manager, and that's what happened to our thread. Now get your ass back to your gay superhero thread before you become hetero :hys:
 
CNutz said:
If you were calling me creepy for starting a underboob thread, then you also included anyone that participated.

I have a feeling your husband went all out Karen, then spoke to the manager, and that's what happened to our thread. Now get your ass back to your gay superhero thread before you become hetero :hys:
Click to expand...
I'm against the gay super hero thing, if you like that shit, that's fine, play with your dolls in your own trailer. Regarding underboob, that was your fault. You look like a creepy ass serial killer in your avatar and you have a bunch of woke soy pussies on the forum, you don't think that buffalo bill shit offended any of your woke butt buddies like Ry?
 
Picasso said:
I'm against the gay super hero thing, if you like that shit, that's fine, play with your dolls in your own trailer. Regarding underboob, that was your fault. You look like a creepy ass serial killer in your avatar and you have a bunch of woke soy pussies on the forum, you don't think that buffalo bill shit offended any of your woke butt buddies like Ry?
Click to expand...

You're clearly homo repressed, let that inner flamer out, and get at that dick you desire. Life's too short to deprive yourself.
 
Artjr said:
CNutz took that avatar picture after shitting out the Keto food.
Click to expand...

We'll actually my avatar is about a year before starting Keto. BTW keto food is meat, fat, real butter, regular ass (low carb) veggies, etc.. All natural shit, no soy, nothing fake.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top