
Thumbpicker
Well-known member
Yes if all us English go back to England and the non English leave Great Britain. But obviously that won’t happenSo you support returning Australia to the aboriginal people.
Yes if all us English go back to England and the non English leave Great Britain. But obviously that won’t happenSo you support returning Australia to the aboriginal people.
North America was also a British Colony.Then how come they all got bad teeth like one another?
I sided with the French.North America was also a British Colony.
I have family heritage from multiple continents. Explain how that should work.Anyway don’t talk to me about Aboriginals until you go back to your home countries and give it back to the Native Americans.
Do you know what hung drawn and quartered is? Maybe we can ship you back to various places in pieces lol.I have family heritage from multiple continents. Explain how that should work.
Maybe if you drum up enough courage to leave your home you can help.Do you know what hung drawn and quartered is? Maybe we can ship you back to various places in pieces lol.
SCIENCEThen how come they all got bad teeth like one another?
Look, I'm not gonna help you earn those Pfizer checks.
You're on your own there, buddy.
![]()
Trying to stay on topic for more than one post isn’t gaslighting.
So are you getting Pfizer checks or not?Trying to stay on topic for more than one post isn’t gaslighting.
No one said it was.Trying to stay on topic for more than one post isn’t gaslighting.
No one said it was.
Calling people crazy when they refuse to buy into your bullshit is the definition of "gaslighting".
We all agree on that but you were basically implying that lockdowns can/do work. You think people can live in a vacuum while I do not believe that is living at all.When I say something like “a virus cannot spread in isolation”, it is just stating a scientific fact.
Do you honestly understand how science works? I think you might not. You need the caveat “According to present commonly accepted theory” if you care to be accurate. But you’re not interested in accuracy, you’re interested in furthering a narrative. So fess up, how much is each check and how often they rollin’ in? ?If you don’t want to believe that, then yea dude you might not be right in the head.
Suuuure ?…but back to the point—it’s just theory. There is no demonstrating this in the real world. So why argue it?When I qualified, several times, that I wasn’t implying that a full lockdown should happen
Science normally works with an open mind testing hypothesis and then using the results that best fit to test a theory and come to some conclusions. You have to rule out alternative reasons for cause and effect as well. From what I have seen of the outlier papers and articles you present, they seem to discount or neglect to consider other reasons for the results. Things can be correlated by coincidence. For example, morbidity from cancer can be explained by people not getting tested early enough during COVID. It doesn't mean the vaccine caused it. That's just an example. For the moment most reasonable people would agree with the bulk of the medical papers and studies on the subject - not the fringe which hasn't had enough verification. You shouldn't seize on one paper to the exclusion of the many others. That's just f'n crazy and deluded and to think you are somehow more intelligent than the people conducting all the mainstream studies is also a sign of delusion. It's an unbalanced conclusion. It's all very well to write a paper but if your assumptions are flawed then so are your conclusions.Do you honestly understand how science works? I think you might not. You need the caveat “According to present commonly accepted theory” if you care to be accurate. But you’re not interested in accuracy, you’re interested in furthering a narrative. So fess up, how much is each check and how often they rollin’ in? ?