Creepy Things on the Internet

  • Thread starter Thread starter NowYou'rePlayingWithPower
  • Start date Start date
Floyd Eye said:
Well there is no doubt he's an attention whore. A decade ago on Teh Ghey Page that was obvious. And which isn't a problem for me. Que Sara Sara and all that. The don't bring up my kids/wife thing though has only one implication. There is only one reason anyone would ever say that and that is to insinuate the person they are addressing was taking shots at them or somehow acting inappropriately towards them. There is literally no way to misunderstand that and Dan fucking knows it. It's one thing to play all these coy little bullshit games he does pretending to not be "up to speed" on a specific topic and then in the next sentence parroting what they are saying about it on MSLSD, it's an entirely other thing to suggest that kind of bullshit knowingly and then pretend he was merely politely asking for his kids not to be brought up. Then less than 4 hours later bringing his kids up himself. Between that and trying to insinuate I had fantasies about killing people Dan is really pushing the old "Thank god you're 1500 miles away from me on a computer" buttons today. People really shouldn't say things on the internet that they wouldn't say in real life, but they do I guess.
Click to expand...

I didn't really catch it all go down, but I understand where you're coming from. It's frustrating and the accusatory bullshit is childish and actually offensive unlike his fake outrage. You're a good guy, from what I've seen here. I wouldn't waste your time stressing on it.
 
acceptance said:
I think the juxtaposition with the rainbows, colors, books, kids and so on make it creepy. If it was just a regular old dark ritual chamber with candles, blood, pentagrams and shit I’d think it was cool. ?‍♂️
Click to expand...

This is AI so I feel comfortable in posting it :dunno:

ADGr9aU.jpg
 
Just looking at this pic posted earlier...

AaNOUBw.jpg


An oft-used defence is that there's no sexual context to these readings, but then why is one of the two books on display (to the right of the... er... rainbow) entitled, "Not All Princesses Dress in Pink"?

Seems clearcut to me. :dunno:
 
Monkey Man said:
Just looking at this pic posted earlier...

View attachment 329358

An oft-used defence is that there's no sexual context to these readings, but then why is one of the two books on display (to the right of the... er... rainbow) entitled, "Not All Princesses Dress in Pink"?

Seems clearcut to me. :dunno:
Click to expand...
I like the numbskulls that, with a straight face will say "Yes, I would let it babysit my kids, why not?"

"Hey, the new babysitter we hired is here honey! Ohhh, don't judge a book by it's cover....he seems like a great guy, stop worrying. He said he is a sleep therapist!!!"

IMG_5203.jpeg
 
japetus said:
I like the numbskulls that, with a straight face will say "Yes, I would let it babysit my kids, why not?"

"Hey, the new babysitter we hired is here honey! Ohhh, don't judge a book by it's cover....he seems like a great guy, stop worrying. He said he is a sleep therapist!!!"

View attachment 329361
Click to expand...

I used to get so scared of the faucet knobs in the bathroom when I was little because of a scene from one of those movies.
 
Monkey Man said:
Just looking at this pic posted earlier...

View attachment 329358

An oft-used defence is that there's no sexual context to these readings, but then why is one of the two books on display (to the right of the... er... rainbow) entitled, "Not All Princesses Dress in Pink"?

Seems clearcut to me. :dunno:
Click to expand...
If you look at that and aren't repulsed in your soul then it's because your spiritual blinders are on. That obviously carries a dark spirit with it. Looks demonic
 
Monkey Man said:
Just looking at this pic posted earlier...

View attachment 329358

An oft-used defence is that there's no sexual context to these readings, but then why is one of the two books on display (to the right of the... er... rainbow) entitled, "Not All Princesses Dress in Pink"?

Seems clearcut to me. :dunno:
Click to expand...

I think the get up is creepy but I don’t see how the book title is sexual.
 
Floyd Eye said:
It didn't affect him. And it could have been anyone's kids. It's exactly the same as if Dan had asked me how I would feel about Trump's rape case if it was my wife who he had allegedly raped. And then I respond angrily with," Don't talk about my wife dude". It's fucking insulting and yeah it pissed me off.
Click to expand...

I think that would be a proper response to someone asking about someone’s wife being hypothetically raped.
 
acceptance said:
I had a husky mix for 14 years. Unknown dad as well — maybe a lab or Shepard. Loved that dog! Have fun. Huskies are an interesting breed. Allot of wild animal in some of ‘em.
Click to expand...
I feel like I see some shepherd in there. In the ears for sure and he has a bristly coat down his spine.
 
Floyd Eye said:
Well there is no doubt he's an attention whore. A decade ago on Teh Ghey Page that was obvious. And which isn't a problem for me. Que Sara Sara and all that. The don't bring up my kids/wife thing though has only one implication. There is only one reason anyone would ever say that and that is to insinuate the person they are addressing was taking shots at them or somehow acting inappropriately towards them. There is literally no way to misunderstand that and Dan fucking knows it. It's one thing to play all these coy little bullshit games he does pretending to not be "up to speed" on a specific topic and then in the next sentence parroting what they are saying about it on MSLSD, it's an entirely other thing to suggest that kind of bullshit knowingly and then pretend he was merely politely asking for his kids not to be brought up. Then less than 4 hours later bringing his kids up himself. Between that and trying to insinuate I had fantasies about killing people Dan is really pushing the old "Thank god you're 1500 miles away from me on a computer" buttons today. People really shouldn't say things on the internet that they wouldn't say in real life, but they do I guess.
Click to expand...

lol who said anything about you fantasizing about killing me? Fuck dude. This is what I’m talking about with your wild ass insinuations.

Also what is MSLSD?
 
Last edited:
Justin Bailey said:
lol who said anything about you fantasizing about killing me? Fuck dude. This is what I’m talking about with your wild ass insinuations.

Also what is MSLSD?
Click to expand...
That’s half the problem Dan. You either read too fast, lack basic reading comprehension or are always drunk.

Re-read my post, right there in your quote. Slowly. Show me where I said you claimed I had fantasies about killing YOU.

AFTER you read it again, go back to the post where you said “ in your fantasy you’d already have your gun out.”

Dumbass.
 
Last edited:
Floyd Eye said:
That’s half the problem Dan. You either read too fast, lack basic reading comprehension or are always drunk.

Re-read my post, right there in your quote. Slowly. Show me where I said you claimed I had fantasies about killing YOU.

AFTER you read it again, go back to the post where you said “ in your fantasy you’d already have your gun out.”

Dumbass.
Click to expand...

Yea, fantasy because you keep making up scenarios in your head to try to prove a point. Made up fantasies. It had nothing to do with you killing anyone lol.


you make up stories to justify your opinions. It’s what you do
 
Justin Bailey said:
Yea, fantasy because you keep making up scenarios in your head to try to prove a point. Made up fantasies. It had nothing to do with you killing anyone lol.


you make up stories to justify your opinions. It’s what you do
Click to expand...
Ha ha. Right. You’re so fucking full of shit Dan. I was stating possible scenarios, ones that have and do actually happen, in a vain attempt to make you understand what’s wrong with Duty To Retreat laws. And you accused me of fantasizing about confronting someone with a gun. Period. And now you’re trying to lie your way out of it. Because you’re a fucking liar. It’s what you do.
 
Floyd Eye said:
Ha ha. Right. You’re so fucking full of shit Dan. I was stating possible scenarios, ones that have and do actually happen, in a vain attempt to make you understand what’s wrong with Duty To Retreat laws. And you accused me of fantasizing about confronting someone with a gun. Period. And now you’re trying to lie your way out of it. Because you’re a fucking liar. It’s what you do.
Click to expand...

He's just trying to get under your skin.
It's what he does.
I think he gets some sort of sick rush off of it.
Kind of creepy, if you ask me.
Like a creepy thing on the internet.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top