
Scott Ians Beard
New member
They play great, but as danyeo said you look like a dork unless you are playing hard rock/metal. I wish you could get them without sharkfins, theyre the dealbreaker for me.
stratotone":1slvcd11 said:I've owned a few dozen USA Jacksons, and I just can't stand the way the soloists sound 'spongy'. I know it probably doesn't make much sense, but the tone just sucks IMHO. I think it has to do with the way the back of the neck joint is so sculpted out and the way it's one piece of wood basically with wings attached. I've never heard a Jackson soloist that amplified sounded 1/2 as good as a set neck hamer, gibson or PRS.
Favorite one I had that was almost normal sounding to me was a really old student archtop soloist - Sn was around 200, it freakin' killed but I had to pay bills and it had to go. I'd buy it back in a heartbeat if I could, was a killer guitar.
USA Jacksons are built well, my favorite years are early 90s, it seems like whoever was doing the fretwork then was a GOD. I just prefer bolt ons and currently have a DK2 quilt top bolt on Jackson that kills, along with a San Dimas strat (pointy head though) and a SD one HB pointy. Great guitars, I just can't get over the tone.
Here's a pic of two I used to have - the student archtop and a green ghost flame I called Kermit for obvious reasons.
![]()
Pete
stratotone":jfh5v4qi said:I've owned a few dozen USA Jacksons, and I just can't stand the way the soloists sound 'spongy'. I know it probably doesn't make much sense, but the tone just sucks IMHO. I think it has to do with the way the back of the neck joint is so sculpted out and the way it's one piece of wood basically with wings attached. I've never heard a Jackson soloist that amplified sounded 1/2 as good as a set neck hamer, gibson or PRS.
Pete
ke2":3ugpty3i said:Did the green ghost flame end up in Norway, by any chance?![]()
Drkorey":6rma62tp said:I'm thinking about picking one of these up, but I am used to/have favored mahogany - just curious if anybody thinks these are really bright guitars? I like their neck profiles from what I remember playing a few in the past. Anybody have one and change the bridge pup out for a beefier sound? FWIW, I'm looking at a SL1-T which would be string thru body not floyd.
stratotone":1myf8onj said:ke2":1myf8onj said:Did the green ghost flame end up in Norway, by any chance?![]()
Yep, were you the one I sold it to? LOL![]()
ke2":3ghjxu6r said:stratotone":3ghjxu6r said:ke2":3ghjxu6r said:Did the green ghost flame end up in Norway, by any chance?![]()
Yep, were you the one I sold it to? LOL![]()
No, but I think I`ve seen it on a Norwegian board...and I wonder ig you sold it to Jonathan?![]()
We`re a small society in Norway, hehehehe![]()
edit:
I seem to be broke every time a nice deal is available. Jacksons prices are sick over here. A new US SL1 is 3600$ over here![]()
Drkorey":1vzjvjz1 said:I'm thinking about picking one of these up, but I am used to/have favored mahogany - just curious if anybody thinks these are really bright guitars? I like their neck profiles from what I remember playing a few in the past. Anybody have one and change the bridge pup out for a beefier sound? FWIW, I'm looking at a SL1-T which would be string thru body not floyd.
'63-Strat":mgv6qts7 said:stratotone":mgv6qts7 said:I've owned a few dozen USA Jacksons, and I just can't stand the way the soloists sound 'spongy'. I know it probably doesn't make much sense, but the tone just sucks IMHO. I think it has to do with the way the back of the neck joint is so sculpted out and the way it's one piece of wood basically with wings attached. I've never heard a Jackson soloist that amplified sounded 1/2 as good as a set neck hamer, gibson or PRS.
Pete
Yeah, I know what you mean by "spongy."