Epstein Files 2026.......... The Truth Uncovered *_*

  • Thread starter Thread starter The~Kid
  • Start date Start date
Let me paint the picture. Gizlane Maxwell, she comes into your pizza place. She's chill as fuck. She's like "look, I'll tell you the truth", but you gotta make me a free pizza right now. Could you feel confident about actually doing that?
I ain't making a pizza for a fucking reptile :mad:
 
I ain't making a pizza for a fucking reptile :mad:
IMG_1001.webp
 
Why is this so hard to understand? Nobody on either side wants to release them
In full because far too many - on both sides - will be mentioned - guilty or not. Trump campaigned on releasing them to score support well before thinking through the ramifications. He only relented because the groundswell forced his hand. It damn sure wasn’t an altruistic effort and refusing to do so would hurt him more politically than the continued stalling. Since then, his administration has been doing everything possible to shield him. If you think the documents that were missing from the last batch was an oversight, you’re naive. To be clear, I imagine the exact same thing would have played out if a democrat was in the Oval Office. This is way bigger than a political party. I’m of the mind that EVERYTHING that doesn’t expose victim details should be published immediately and anyone guilty of pedophilia or corrupt behavior - regardless of statute or wealth, should be charged, tried and convicted. Sadly, there are too many layers of protection for the privileged for that to be realistic.

P.S. To be clear, do I think Trump is a pedophile? I sincerely hope not and I’ve yet to see anything that definitively says he is. But, his efforts to obscure the release of documents gives me pause. If I was POTUS, and innocent, regardless of adjacent mentions in the files, I would force publish everything knowing that I could explain them away. There is a severe lack of personal accountability in today’s world…

Again, just my .02…
Based. :uzi:
 
Meanwhile while many waste their time and chase their tails on the Epstein Files.......


Children now are getting extorted and trafficked.......


 
Am i supposed to feel guilty for not having empathy for people who hung out with Jeffrey Epstein?


:LOL::LOL::LOL::LOL::LOL::LOL::LOL::LOL::LOL::LOL::LOL::LOL::LOL::LOL::LOL::LOL::LOL::LOL::LOL::LOL::LOL::LOL::LOL::LOL::LOL::LOL::LOL::LOL::LOL::LOL::LOL::LOL::LOL::LOL::LOL::LOL::LOL::LOL::LOL::LOL::LOL::LOL::LOL::LOL::LOL::LOL::LOL::LOL::LOL::LOL::LOL::LOL::LOL::LOL::LOL::LOL::LOL::LOL::LOL::LOL::LOL::LOL::LOL::LOL::LOL::LOL::LOL::LOL::LOL::LOL::LOL::LOL::LOL::LOL::LOL::LOL::LOL::LOL::LOL::LOL::LOL::LOL::LOL::LOL::LOL::LOL::LOL::LOL::LOL::LOL::LOL::LOL::LOL::LOL::LOL::LOL::LOL::LOL::LOL::LOL::LOL::LOL::LOL::LOL::LOL::LOL::LOL::LOL::LOL::LOL::LOL::LOL::LOL::LOL::LOL::LOL::LOL::LOL::LOL::LOL::LOL::LOL::LOL::LOL::LOL::LOL::LOL::LOL::LOL::LOL::LOL::LOL::LOL::LOL::LOL::LOL::LOL::LOL::LOL::LOL::LOL::LOL::LOL::LOL::LOL::LOL::LOL::LOL::LOL::LOL::LOL::LOL::LOL:


You actually wrote that 😂😂😂

Good for me for not hanging out with pedophiles?? What fucking planet am i on? 🤣

You. Are. A. Pedophile. Emphasizer.
He sure is.
 
The truth is WokeMericans/Democrats are trying to distract everyone and everybody from the truth....... They are explicit in........:yes:


Why else would these reptilian POS garbage not release the files in 4+ years....... Ask Biden/Kamala, Schumer, Pelosi, AOC and the rest of the Democrat Socialist/Communist and Pink Pussy Hat Fancy Bagel Eaters at CNN/MSNBC/NYTimes :dunno:




And why are they distracting from the obvious things happening now under everyones nose :unsure:


 
I honestly don’t know what that means.😀 I tend to ignore labels. I also hate acronyms, so I have that going for me 👍
It's a high compliment brother.

Webster's definition:
Based is used approvingly to describe someone who projects a lack of concern about how others feel about their actions or opinions. It can also describe a thing, such as an action or event, perceived as both bold and commendable, especially if it challenges or flouts convention in some way.

So it's a whole-lot more than a descriptor of something factual. There's great emphasis on commending an unpopular / politically-incorrect stance without a care.
 
Funny, in every police investigation involving a dead spouse that did not die of natural causes, the cops first investigate the living spouse without even having evidence the spouse did it. It’s just the way it goes because spouses generally are the culprit.

But one thing ya never fuckin’ hear is, “Oh, we can’t investigate the spouse, what if he’s innocent? That’ll look bad for him”

So we can investigate husbands and wives by default and that’s all ok to come out in the wash as it eventually does, but we can’t investigate claims of child sexual abuse because the people getting investigated might look bad before they’re cleared?

And now we’re going to give grace to……politicians?

slag-vomit.gif


The sad thing is, at least some of you “Nope, this is all ok!” fucks actually know in your guts this shit ain’t cool, but your blind zealous for a political party will allow you to ignore your own integrity and for that, I’ll chug some water so the dry heaving isn’t as bad.

I dunno about any of you, but if my name came up in a report about that shit, I’d be first in line with every fucking electronic device and information I had to clear my name and no one would have to subpoena or get a warrant for it, I’d HAPPILY hand that shit over to clear my name.
 
Last edited:
Funny, in every police investigation involving a dead spouse that did not die of natural causes, the cops first investigate the living spouse without even having evidence the spouse did it. It’s just the way it goes because spouses generally are the culprit.

But one thing ya never fuckin’ hear is, “Oh, we can’t investigate the spouse, what if he’s innocent? That’ll look bad for him”

So we can investigate husbands and wives by default and that’s all ok to come out in the wash as it eventually does, but we can’t investigate claims of child sexual abuse because the people getting investigated might look bad before they’re cleared?

And now we’re going to give grace to……politicians?

slag-vomit.gif


The sad thing is, at least some of you “Nope, this is all ok!” fucks actually know in your guts this shit ain’t cool, but your blind zealous for a political party will allow you to ignore your own integrity and for that, I’ll chug some water so the dry heaving isn’t as bad.

I dunno about any of you, but if my name came up in a report about that shit, I’d be first in line with every fucking electronic device and information I had to clear my name and no one would have to subpoena or get a warrant for it, I’d HAPPILY hand that shit over to clear my name.
Well said and I agree 100% !
 
Funny, in every police investigation involving a dead spouse that did not die of natural causes, the cops first investigate the living spouse without even having evidence the spouse did it. It’s just the way it goes because spouses generally are the culprit.

But one thing ya never fuckin’ hear is, “Oh, we can’t investigate the spouse, what if he’s innocent? That’ll look bad for him”

So we can investigate husbands and wives by default and that’s all ok to come out in the wash as it eventually does, but we can’t investigate claims of child sexual abuse because the people getting investigated might look bad before they’re cleared?

And now we’re going to give grace to……politicians?

slag-vomit.gif


The sad thing is, at least some of you “Nope, this is all ok!” fucks actually know in your guts this shit ain’t cool, but your blind zealous for a political party will allow you to ignore your own integrity and for that, I’ll chug some water so the dry heaving isn’t as bad.

I dunno about any of you, but if my name came up in a report about that shit, I’d be first in line with every fucking electronic device and information I had to clear my name and no one would have to subpoena or get a warrant for it, I’d HAPPILY hand that shit over to clear my name.
Dude coming in with more diarrhea of the mouth...... :yes:


WokeMericans will never take responsibility or stop defending Democrat Socialist Communist Pedophiles by spinning their Woke BS lies :dunno:
 
FYI; I've been trying to get a new rule in the infractions list, anyone using the term "WokeMericans" more than once in a thread gets 2 points toward a vacation.
Why..... I'm doing a service..... :dunno:


Someone has to call out these WokeMericans 😂
 
I just rediscovered this thread. When I posted late in the thread, I didn't read all previous posts...which i just did. I can't stop laughing and EPIC comes to mind, not because of the OP but all the participation that came after.
Thanks everybody for a genuine Sunday night hoot.
 

Similar threads

Back
Top