JimmyBlind":2ij09i66 said:I found it a bit dark for my liking, but that's just my opinion.
Loved the clean and thought the price point was great for an amp of that quality & versatility.
ubermetaldood":1pp1vhha said:It's smoother and much more versatile than I thought it would be.
Faxanadu":163gkjzh said:ubermetaldood":163gkjzh said:It's smoother and much more versatile than I thought it would be.
All you said ubermetaldood is completely true for me as well.
It sounded dark the first weeks until I understood how to dial in. Also I get 2 completely different sound whether I use my RL v30 or FL K100. I was not believing anybody that there could be so much of a difference, until I get both aside.
I got it to play mostly metal but I ended up playing all other styles as well. The clean channel is just so nicely voiced.
I still get one of my best metal tone out of channel 3, with mid-cut for riffing and without for solos.
The features are far enough for me (with the 2 switchable loops, mid-cut and 2 masters).
I think if Dmoll was in the same price range than the other Diezels (Hagen or Herbert), I would still get Dmoll.
With unlimited budget I would have Hagen also (which is the best comprise in the Diezel range IMHO) !!!
In Dmoll I trust !
ubermetaldood":20sj92r0 said:I've always wanted a Herbert so if I had the money that would be the first one I would get. I have played the Hagen though and it's incredible. May I ask what settings you use for scooped metal sounds?
Do you have a source for that claim? afaik "demon" was just a hicc-up that happened at the namm and some youtube-interviewer read the name wrong off the faceplate. And the "thrash" part, no idea where that comes from, especially with a great clean and lowgain Ch1 like that.ubermetaldood":156ur2rm said:First of all, it was supposed to be named D-Mon (Demon) and is marketed like a thrash amp