
IntenseJim
Active member
For a day I had a Friedman amp with Voicing hi cut, BE, HBE and rear Fat, C45, Sat and 1/2 power options and Simple Clean. I didn't try the 1/2 power switch.
Amazingly flexible EQ section on the lead channel let's me get nearly any overdriven tone I could ask for.
Gain and sustain are wicked.
Speaker specificity is minimal: it sounded phenominal with all my Scumback loaded cabs (all are different typs of Scummies).
Clean is nice but for classic BF clean tones look elsewhere.
Max'd OD channel is a tad noisy compared to some other massive high gain amps I've tried.
Compared to my SLOs and Soldano-modded Lucky 13 (more gain and tweaked EQ
SLO
The Friedman has more gain and a more flexible EQ; more sustain, saturation and compression with the appropriate rear switches kicked is attainable if you like.
Friedman is noisier than the SLO.
The SLO can get the idiosyncratic upper mid thing going that I couldn't quite get exactly nail with the Friedman: Dark Chocolate vs Dutch Chocolate and surely not better or worse.
Soldano clean with scoop mod I think is a hair nicer than the Friedman simple clean. The Soldano crunch channel is a thing of beauty; while the Friedman can get there on the gain channel, this particular Friedman amp head doesn't allow you to switch from crunch to scream; only clean to crunch or clean to scream.
Lucky 13 modded head
L13 modded head nearly but not quite as much gain as the Friedman and a bit more gain than the SLO.
EQ section on the L13 is more similar to the Friedman than the SLO. But the Friedman still has it's own sound or tone which is exeptional and just divine ear candy. Distortion high gain I'd take the Friedman over the L13.
L13 clean channel smokes the clean on both the SLO and Friedman head.
Having all three amps would not be terribly redundant for 98% of those who read this. If you like gain from low crunch to supernova blistering, you'd be hard pressed to do any better than the Friedman head IMHO
Amazingly flexible EQ section on the lead channel let's me get nearly any overdriven tone I could ask for.
Gain and sustain are wicked.
Speaker specificity is minimal: it sounded phenominal with all my Scumback loaded cabs (all are different typs of Scummies).
Clean is nice but for classic BF clean tones look elsewhere.
Max'd OD channel is a tad noisy compared to some other massive high gain amps I've tried.
Compared to my SLOs and Soldano-modded Lucky 13 (more gain and tweaked EQ

SLO
The Friedman has more gain and a more flexible EQ; more sustain, saturation and compression with the appropriate rear switches kicked is attainable if you like.
Friedman is noisier than the SLO.
The SLO can get the idiosyncratic upper mid thing going that I couldn't quite get exactly nail with the Friedman: Dark Chocolate vs Dutch Chocolate and surely not better or worse.
Soldano clean with scoop mod I think is a hair nicer than the Friedman simple clean. The Soldano crunch channel is a thing of beauty; while the Friedman can get there on the gain channel, this particular Friedman amp head doesn't allow you to switch from crunch to scream; only clean to crunch or clean to scream.
Lucky 13 modded head
L13 modded head nearly but not quite as much gain as the Friedman and a bit more gain than the SLO.
EQ section on the L13 is more similar to the Friedman than the SLO. But the Friedman still has it's own sound or tone which is exeptional and just divine ear candy. Distortion high gain I'd take the Friedman over the L13.
L13 clean channel smokes the clean on both the SLO and Friedman head.
Having all three amps would not be terribly redundant for 98% of those who read this. If you like gain from low crunch to supernova blistering, you'd be hard pressed to do any better than the Friedman head IMHO