NoHassle
Well-known member
The global disruptions we have experienced in recent years are often portrayed as a chaotic series of events: a “pandemic,” inflation, energy shortages, and war.
A structural analysis reveals a more conscious, controlled destruction of the 20th century social contract.
For decades, the German economy was based on three pillars: cheap Russian gas, high-tech exports to China and a US security umbrella. By the end of 2025, all three were broken.
If Germany had continued to integrate with Russia and China, it would have created a power pole independent of the US dollar. The conflict in Ukraine served a purpose: it resulted in Germany replacing Russian pipeline gas and forcing Germany to massively expand its liquefied natural gas (LNG) infrastructure and rely on LNG from the United States.
The City of London thrives on global volatility. The city is, among other things, the global center for war risk insurance and energy brokerage. If a pipeline is destroyed or a strategically important shipping route is threatened, the price of war risk insurance triples. The London insurance market (Lloyd's) removes these “risk premiums” from the global economy.
The City of London has secured its position as an indispensable facilitator of the transatlantic energy transition. While the physical gas comes from the US and is consumed in Europe, the financial and legal architecture of this trade is almost entirely managed in London.
The structural realignment of economies leads to enormous social tensions. This is where the “Russian threat” comes into play. It has been elevated to an all-encompassing internal narrative designed to manage internal disagreements and encourage the public to rally behind the flag. The bogeyman serves a vital psychological function by transforming the growing anger of the impoverished into a patriotic duty to endure hardship.
By creating a permanent state of war, the elite ensures that a mainstay of the economy is that which directly serves the security of the state, while the population is made to believe that their dwindling health care and pensions are a necessary sacrifice for national survival.
We also see the changing status of humans. In the industrial age, the state “subscribed” to the working class and invested in the NHS and education because it needed an able population to drive production. Artificial intelligence, robotics and economic decline are making much of this workforce increasingly redundant.
When the worker is no longer needed for production, the state considers healthcare as a “non-provisional cost” that must be liquidated.
In 2025, official impact assessments found that legalizing euthanasia would lead to “significant cost savings” for the NHS and the state pension system – estimated at up to £18.3 million for pensions alone over a decade. In the legal impact assessment for terminally ill adults (end of life) (May 2025), the effects on “benefits and pensions” were officially quantified. It was estimated that by year 10 the state would save around £27.7 million a year in unpaid pensions and benefits due to euthanasia.
A structural analysis reveals a more conscious, controlled destruction of the 20th century social contract.
For decades, the German economy was based on three pillars: cheap Russian gas, high-tech exports to China and a US security umbrella. By the end of 2025, all three were broken.
If Germany had continued to integrate with Russia and China, it would have created a power pole independent of the US dollar. The conflict in Ukraine served a purpose: it resulted in Germany replacing Russian pipeline gas and forcing Germany to massively expand its liquefied natural gas (LNG) infrastructure and rely on LNG from the United States.
The City of London thrives on global volatility. The city is, among other things, the global center for war risk insurance and energy brokerage. If a pipeline is destroyed or a strategically important shipping route is threatened, the price of war risk insurance triples. The London insurance market (Lloyd's) removes these “risk premiums” from the global economy.
The City of London has secured its position as an indispensable facilitator of the transatlantic energy transition. While the physical gas comes from the US and is consumed in Europe, the financial and legal architecture of this trade is almost entirely managed in London.
The structural realignment of economies leads to enormous social tensions. This is where the “Russian threat” comes into play. It has been elevated to an all-encompassing internal narrative designed to manage internal disagreements and encourage the public to rally behind the flag. The bogeyman serves a vital psychological function by transforming the growing anger of the impoverished into a patriotic duty to endure hardship.
By creating a permanent state of war, the elite ensures that a mainstay of the economy is that which directly serves the security of the state, while the population is made to believe that their dwindling health care and pensions are a necessary sacrifice for national survival.
We also see the changing status of humans. In the industrial age, the state “subscribed” to the working class and invested in the NHS and education because it needed an able population to drive production. Artificial intelligence, robotics and economic decline are making much of this workforce increasingly redundant.
When the worker is no longer needed for production, the state considers healthcare as a “non-provisional cost” that must be liquidated.
In 2025, official impact assessments found that legalizing euthanasia would lead to “significant cost savings” for the NHS and the state pension system – estimated at up to £18.3 million for pensions alone over a decade. In the legal impact assessment for terminally ill adults (end of life) (May 2025), the effects on “benefits and pensions” were officially quantified. It was estimated that by year 10 the state would save around £27.7 million a year in unpaid pensions and benefits due to euthanasia.
