
rickenbacker198
Active member
I enjoyed this - thought some of you would too.
Hold on, folks - that RR is a BOLT-ON! Impossible to draw any conclusions now about all guitars sounding similar regardless of their shape, pickups, or construction, which was the point the OP was making! Burn the video!JMP2203":1shv0bbb said:a bolt on neck RR and a neck thru RG? those guitars are not famous for that, sorry
Vede":zlr6mpyv said:Hold on, folks - that RR is a BOLT-ON! Impossible to draw any conclusions now about all guitars sounding similar regardless of their shape, pickups, or construction, which was the point the OP was making! Burn the video!JMP2203":zlr6mpyv said:a bolt on neck RR and a neck thru RG? those guitars are not famous for that, sorry
OP - very cool video. Thank you.
I think you're generally correct that the order makes a difference. But, also, I think that PRS just happens to sound dull and muddy. Click back and forth between the Les Paul and the PRS without the strat in the middle and you'll see the strat isn't coloring your perception as much as you might think.sytharnia1560":11ownkbz said:the problem with this video is the tone of the guitar previous to the next one clouds your perception of the tone...example a strat right after a les paul will of course sound very bright which in tune will make the PRS sound dull and muddy, but if you had the les paul then the PRS you would hear it differently
To get anything out of this you would need to isolate the guitars you wanted to compare and play them one after the other and then flip that around and play them in the reverse order
Vede":36usyzhn said:I think you're generally correct that the order makes a difference. But, also, I think that PRS just happens to sound dull and muddy. Click back and forth between the Les Paul and the PRS without the strat in the middle and you'll see the strat isn't coloring your perception as much as you might think.