Hey RT fuck bois

  • Thread starter Thread starter Dan Gleesak
  • Start date Start date
acceptance said:
It's obvious you don't want to post anything that can be scrutinized. Can you post a specific study to look at?
Click to expand...
You are like a child that wants me to get them a water even though they are perfectly capable of getting themselves lol.

I’ve posted what I think is relevant. Feel to read up, or dont. Like I said, this this isn’t my opinion, I have no need to defend it.
 
"Hey look! I'm a douche! Anyone who disagrees with MY science is ANTI-SCIENCE and thats DEADLY!"

"PS I'll sue!"

GF0SuPDWUAAP8Wd.jpg
 
Aynirar27 said:
You are like a child that wants me to get them a water even though they are perfectly capable of getting themselves lol.

I’ve posted what I think is relevant. Feel to read up, or dont. Like I said, this this isn’t my opinion, I have no need to defend it.
Click to expand...
You're so full of shit :ROFLMAO:
 
Good news, looks like what is left of the ers-2 satellite largely ended up in the ocean

Also back on topic, IM-1 is officially in lunar orbit. Hopefully touchdown will still be tomorrow
 
I'll just say this 'cause IMHO it underlies and explains everything these days:

Peer-reviewed studies and papers ain't what they used to be. It's a miracle if you can get something published that threatens your peers' POV's and subsequently their tenures.

One has blind faith in the peer-review system at one's peril.
 
Monkey Man said:
I'll just say this 'cause IMHO it underlies and explains everything these days:

Peer-reviewed studies and papers ain't what they used to be. It's a miracle if you can get something published that threatens your peers' POV's and subsequently their tenures.

One has blind faith in the peer-review system at one's peril.
Click to expand...
They are still instrumental to the scientific process though. Atmospheric studies have going on for a very long time and have been done by probably thousands of different people from different countries with different backgrounds.
To me the danger is headlines. So many opinions are formed by them.
Just like the vaccine thread I was tagged in earlier. No one in it can even explain the results to me but they sure are up in arms about it.
Same thing happens on the other end of things. I see countless “new earthlike planet found!” Or “”possible signs of life” blah blah, none of it is confirmed or peer reviewed. It’s important to read up on stuff, which in the he case of global conditions, I feel like I have, for fun and from my education.
 
Aynirar27 said:
They are still instrumental to the scientific process though. Atmospheric studies have going on for a very long time and have been done by probably thousands of different people from different countries with different backgrounds.
To me the danger is headlines. So many opinions are formed by them.
Just like the vaccine thread I was tagged in earlier. No one in it can even explain the results to me but they sure are up in arms about it.
Same thing happens on the other end of things. I see countless “new earthlike planet found!” Or “”possible signs of life” blah blah, none of it is confirmed or peer reviewed. It’s important to read up on stuff, which in the he case of global conditions, I feel like I have, for fun and from my education.
Click to expand...
I'm just glad you're triple vaxxed, bro !

Stay safe !

? ? ?
 
Monkey Man said:
I hear ya bro', but the problem isn't in the data; it's in the interpretation.
Click to expand...
I agree. It’s why I’m so wary of the “do your own research” crowd. Not everyone is capable of processing raw data on every subject. And I fully include myself in that group.
Mix that with people getting news from tweets and YouTube shorts and it really messes stuff up.
The good news is, that there are people who dedicate their lives to being able to interpret and process the stuff.

There often seems to be a pattern of people who distrust the government, big pharma, college educated people, etc, whatever, and it causes them to think that everyone involved is part of this faceless corporation they are so against. Shit even Taylor swift and mark Zuckerberg get brought in to this stuff lol.

But the people doing the actual science aren’t the faceless entities. They are passionate people. Every university in world has done studies on this stuff and it’s always similar conclusions. Hundreds of years people have been studying this stuff, all over the world, and come to the same conclusions. No “machine” is that big.

A healthy dose of distrust towards a government is healthy, and sure the “global boiling” headlines are stupid, but I think people owe it to themselves as intelligent beings to look past that and learn about the source info, because it is more often than not, irrefutable data
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top